Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain on-path or upstream DNS response position
-
DeliveryInject response with valid IN RRset plus forged CH/HS records
-
Exploitverify_rrsets() skips non-IN signature check
-
ExecutionForged DS authenticates attacker DNSKEY
-
ImpactChild-zone responses forged and marked secure
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Data authenticity verification
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to be able to supply DNS responses to a Hickory-based validating resolver - e.g. an on-path/MITM position, a malicious or compromised upstream resolver, or a controlled authoritative server - matching the AT:P (attack requirements) flag; it is not blind remote-from-anywhere exploitation. The response must contain a genuinely validating IN-class RRset alongside the forged CH or HS class records (including a forged DS), since the non-IN records only inherit 'secure' status when the IN records verify. Affected code paths are hickory-proto before 0.26.0-beta.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 through 0.26.1 with DNSSEC validation in use. Limiting factors: the on-path/response-injection requirement, the integrity-only (no confidentiality or availability) impact, and the advisory's note that real-world impact depends on how downstream systems handle records with unexpected DNS classes. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity DNSSEC validation bypass (CVSS 4.0 base 6.3, vendor-provided) in the Hickory DNS Rust implementation. The vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N tells a consistent story: it is reachable over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, but the AT:P (attack requirements present) flag reflects the real precondition stated in the advisory - the attacker must be able to supply DNS responses to the resolver (on-path/MITM position, a malicious upstream, or a controlled authoritative server). Impact is integrity-only and rated low (VI:L; VC:N/VA:N), because the practical consequence depends on how downstream systems treat records with an unexpected DNS class. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or working exploit is present in the input, so there is no signal of active or widespread exploitation; the vuln.today decision label is 'this_month', i.e. a prioritized-but-not-emergency fix. The main caveat: although the raw impact is scored low, the mechanism is serious - forging a DS record with a non-IN class lets an attacker authenticate any DNSKEY and forge any child-zone response, which could in principle be leveraged into higher-impact spoofing depending on downstream handling. Treat the low integrity score as the vendor's conservative floor, not a ceiling. No conflicting signals were observed between the CVSS vector and the description. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker positioned to supply DNS responses to a Hickory-based resolver (on-path interception or a malicious/compromised upstream) returns a response whose IN-class records verify correctly but which also carries forged CH or HS class records - including a forged DS record. Because verify_rrsets() partitions RRsets without considering DNS class, the non-IN records bypass signature verification yet inherit the 'secure' status of the validated IN records, allowing the attacker to authenticate an arbitrary DNSKEY and forge child-zone data. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis; the attack requires the ability to inject responses rather than purely remote blind interaction. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 08, 2026
DNSSEC validation bypass in Hickory DNS allows attackers who can supply DNS responses to a validating resolver to have forged CH- or HS-class records, including DS records, treated as secure after genuine IN-class records validate. Affected code is hickory-proto before 0.26.0-beta.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 through 0.26.1. The issue has integrity-only impact, requires the attacker to be able to inject or supply DNS responses, and no public exploit code is identified in the supplied intelligence.
RemediationAI
Upgrade hickory-net to 0.26.2, the fixed version listed in the advisory. For hickory-proto, the supplied data lists versions before 0.26.0-beta.1 as vulnerable and marks the fixed version as not yet patched, so consult GHSA-wjgj-fvg9-65w9 for the current vendor-designated patched release and move to it as soon as available. If an immediate upgrade is not possible, reduce exposure by ensuring validating resolvers only accept DNS responses from trusted upstream resolvers or trusted network paths, since the bypass requires an attacker to supply responses; alternatively, reject or filter non-IN class records at the resolver boundary, but this can break legitimate CHAOS-class lookups and does not correct the underlying verify_rrsets() flaw. Updating is the complete fix, and partial mitigations only lower the chance of response injection or unexpected-class handling.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Hickory DNS is a Rust implementation of DNS protocols; hickory-proto provides protocol types and hickory-net provides networking and resolver behavior. The root cause is that verify_rrsets() partitions records into RRsets without considering DNS class, and records with a class other than IN are filtered out before signature verification; when the IN-class records verify, the non-IN records are also marked secure. This is an authentication-check flaw (CWE-345, with the advisory also citing CWE-358), not a memory-safety bug. A forged DS record in CH or HS class can be used to authenticate an arbitrary DNSKEY and forge child-zone responses, so the real-world impact depends on how downstream systems handle records with unexpected DNS classes.
Know when Hickory Dns gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N), but the attacker must hold a response-injection position (AT:P maps to AC:H), with integrity-only impact (I:L) and no confidentiality or availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Hickory DNS hickory-proto before 0.26.0-beta.1 and hickory-net before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation bypass because verify_rrsets() ignores DNS class when partitioning RRsets, so non-IN records skip signature verification yet are marked secure when the IN records verify. Attackers able to supply DNS responses can include forged CH or HS class records, including DS records, to authenticate any DNSKEY and forge child zone responses.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Related Vulnerabilities in Hickory DNS Multiple Security Flaws
View all 36More in Hickory Dns
View allMalformed TSIG records can crash Hickory DNS 0.26.0 through 0.26.1 builds compiled with overflow checks enabled, causing
Remote, unauthenticated memory-amplification denial of service affects Hickory DNS (the hickory-proto crate) versions 0.
EUVD-2026-119358
GHSA-rp29-c6r7-8r7c
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB