Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain local access to Windows host
-
DeliveryOpen handle to Core Temp driver
-
ExploitInvoke exposed IOCTL lacking access control
-
ExecutionRead/write arbitrary physical memory
-
ImpactEscalate privileges to kernel/SYSTEM
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Exposed IOCTL with insufficient ACL
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires local access to a Windows host on which the ALCPU Core Temp kernel driver is installed and loaded; the attacker then invokes the specific exposed IOCTL whose access-control checks are insufficient, gaining arbitrary physical-memory read/write. Limiting factors: local attack vector only (no network/remote path, AV:L), an existing local session is required, and the Core Temp driver must be present/loaded. The vendor CVSS marks PR:H (high privilege), but the description's 'insufficient access control' phrasing indicates the IOCTL may be reachable by lower-privileged or unprivileged local processes - the exact required privilege level is not confirmed in the available sources and should be verified with the vendor. |
| Impact | This is a locally-exploitable Windows kernel-driver flaw (CWE-782, exposed IOCTL with insufficient access control) that permits arbitrary physical-memory read AND write - effectively full kernel/SYSTEM compromise once reached. The vendor CVSS 3.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U, C:H/I:H/A:H, base 6.7) scores it as a high-privilege local issue, but that PR:H is in tension with the description's core claim of 'insufficient access control' in an exposed IOCTL, which normally implies the interface is reachable by lower-privileged (or any local) callers - if so, real severity is higher and closer to a privilege-escalation primitive. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit are present in the supplied data, so there is no evidence of active or at-scale exploitation. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' (not act_now/emergency), consistent with a credible JPCERT/JVN-reported local flaw that warrants scheduled remediation rather than crisis response. Net: a genuine local privilege-escalation / BYOVD-class risk worth patching this month, bounded by the requirement for local access rather than a remotely-wormable priority. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A local attacker or malware already running on a Windows host that has the ALCPU Core Temp kernel driver loaded invokes the exposed IOCTL, which fails to enforce adequate access control. Using the resulting arbitrary physical-memory read/write, the attacker overwrites kernel structures to escalate to kernel/SYSTEM or read sensitive memory. No public proof-of-concept is identified in the available data; the exact trigger details are not described in the sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026
Arbitrary physical-memory read and write is reachable through an exposed IOCTL in the ALCPU Core Temp Windows kernel driver, which performs insufficient access control on that control path (CWE-782). The attack is local: an attacker needs an existing session on a Windows host where the Core Temp driver is installed and loaded, after which invoking the affected IOCTL can yield physical-memory read/write and, in practice, kernel/SYSTEM-level compromise. Severity is moderate on paper (vendor CVSS 6.7, assessed 6.7) but the impact is total once the interface is reached; the vendor vector marks PR:H while the independent assessment scores PR:L based on the insufficient-access-control description, and that privilege discrepancy is not resolved by the available sources. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and the trigger conditions are only partially described in the available sources.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, and the supplied references (http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp and https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN23328936/) do not state a fixed version, so check both for an updated driver before deploying anything else and confirm with ALCPU which release corrects the IOCTL access check. Until a fix is published, the containment that follows directly from the assessed prerequisites is to keep the Core Temp driver off hosts where lower-privileged or untrusted local users have sessions: uninstall the product, or stop and disable the driver so it is not loaded, accepting the loss of Core Temp's temperature-monitoring functionality on those machines. Where monitoring must continue, verify the actual privilege required to reach the IOCTL rather than relying on the disputed PR:H versus PR:L scoring, since that determines whether standard user accounts are sufficient to trigger the flaw. No other workarounds are described in the available sources.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Core Temp is a Windows hardware-monitoring utility from ALCPU that ships a kernel-mode driver; the flaw sits in that driver's IOCTL surface rather than in the user-mode application. CWE-782 (Exposed IOCTL with Insufficient Access Control) describes exactly this class: the driver exposes a device-control interface that does not adequately validate or restrict the caller, so a request that should be out of reach can still be dispatched, and here the affected request is one whose effect is reading or writing physical memory. Because the primitive operates on physical memory, it can be used to corrupt or disclose kernel structures and escalate to SYSTEM. The available sources do not identify the specific IOCTL code, the device object name, or the exact access check that fails, and they do not describe how the request is triggered beyond the general statement that access control is insufficient; the vulnerability is confirmed only at the level of the exposed IOCTL reaching physical-memory operations. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:alcpu:core_temp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* is unversioned, so no bounded version range is established. Exploitation is constrained by the local attack vector (AV:L) and by the requirement that the driver be present and loaded; the required privilege level is disputed between the vendor vector (PR:H) and the independent assessment (PR:L) and should be verified with the vendor.
Know when Core Temp gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Local IOCTL (AV:L, AC:L, UI:N); 'insufficient access control' implies a local user can reach it, so PR:L not PR:H; physical-memory read/write yields full C:H/I:H/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (jpcert).
CVSS VectorVendor: jpcert
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
The Core Temp kernel driver provided by ALCPU is vulnerable to insufficient access control in an exposed IOCTL, which may allow physical memory to be read or written.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity vulnerability in the ALCPU Core Temp Windows kernel driver allows local users to gain kernel-level control, potentially compromising the entire system. Although exploitation requires an existing session and the driver's presence, the privilege discrepancy in scoring suggests that a lower-privileged user could escalate to full SYSTEM access, posing a significant risk to organizations using this driver. Leadership should prioritize remediation to prevent local attackers from obtaining domain-wide or sensitive data access.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include uninstalling the Core Temp driver where not essential, restricting interactive logon to trusted users, and monitoring for anomalous IOCTL activity.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-116584
GHSA-8rm3-w4gx-f78w
NVD
CVE.org
Exploit-DB