Skip to main content

HPE Fabric Composer EUVDEUVD-2026-116280

| CVE-2026-95736 HIGH
2026-11-03 security-alert@hpe.com GHSA-c4rp-565m-whvq
8.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: hpe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent network position
  2. Delivery
    Await attacker-uncontrolled precondition
  3. Exploit
    Exploit improper certificate validation
  4. Execution
    Intercept trusted TLS session
  5. Impact
    Capture sensitive information

Vulnerability Assessment

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to be network-adjacent (AV:A) to the HPE Networking Fabric Composer management interface and depends on 'certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control' being met, as stated verbatim in the description - the sources do not enumerate what those preconditions are, so the exact triggering circumstance is not described in the available sources. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N), but the high attack complexity (AC:H) combined with the attacker-uncontrolled preconditions is the primary limiting factor: the attacker cannot force the vulnerable condition and must rely on an opportune, externally-determined state to intercept traffic. The specific interface, protocol, and configuration that exhibit the improper certificate validation are not detailed in the provided data.

Impact

This is a moderate-priority issue whose real-world risk is tempered by its own CVSS metrics. The vendor vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.3) combines an adjacent attack vector (AV:A) with high attack complexity (AC:H) and - explicitly reinforced by the description - 'certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control.' That AC:H plus the stated out-of-band preconditions is the single most important risk-limiting signal: the attacker cannot unilaterally arrange exploitation. No EPSS probability, SSVC exploitation/automatable fields, or KEV entry were supplied; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The vuln.today priority is 'this_week' (not act_now/emergency), which is consistent with a credible-but-not-urgent flaw. One internal tension worth flagging: the description characterizes impact only as the ability to 'intercept sensitive information' (a confidentiality outcome typical of improper certificate validation / MITM), yet the vendor vector asserts I:H and A:H with a scope change (S:C) - the full integrity and availability impact and the scope change are not substantiated by the narrative text and should be verified against the HPE advisory. Net: a real issue to patch on a normal cycle, not a drop-everything emergency, given adjacency, high complexity, attacker-uncontrolled preconditions, and no evidence of exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positioned on an adjacent network segment to an HPE Networking Fabric Composer deployment waits for or leverages a specific precondition outside their control, then exploits the interface's improper certificate validation to insert themselves into an otherwise-trusted TLS session and intercept sensitive information in transit. Because the flaw is network-adjacent with high attack complexity, the attacker needs suitable positioning and the right conditions rather than a simple remote request. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026

Improper certificate validation in an affected interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated, network-adjacent attacker to intercept sensitive information when preconditions outside the attacker's control are satisfied. The supplied data does not identify specific affected versions or the exact interface, and no public exploit was identified at time of analysis; there is no CISA KEV confirmation. The assessed impact is high confidentiality loss with low integrity impact and no availability impact, while high attack complexity and attacker-uncontrolled preconditions temper practical risk.

RemediationAI

The supplied data does not include an exact fixed version, patch identifier, or vendor-listed workaround, so remediation must be confirmed from the HPE advisory at https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw05172en_us&docLocale=en_US. Until a fixed release is identified, restrict reachability to the Fabric Composer management interface to trusted administrative network segments, since the attack requires network adjacency; this reduces exposure but does not correct the certificate validation flaw and may limit legitimate administrative access. Avoid relying on the affected interface for sensitive certificate-protected communications until the vendor confirms a corrected release.

Affected VersionsENISA

Fabric Composer 7.4.0 ≤7.4.0
Fabric Composer 7.0.0 ≤7.3.4

Affected Packages

euvd fabric_composer no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is improper certificate validation in an affected HPE Networking Fabric Composer interface. The available sources do not name the interface, protocol, certificate-validation routine, CPE mapping, or CWE identifier, so the trigger is not described in the available sources. The assessed vector is AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N: the attacker must be network-adjacent, no authentication or user interaction is required, and attack complexity is high because the attacker cannot force the external preconditions and must rely on an opportune state. The assessment rates confidentiality impact as high and integrity impact as low, with no availability impact and unchanged scope; the NVD-style vector supplied separately indicates broader impact, but the independent assessment is the authoritative characterization used here.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hpe) PRIMARY 8.3 HIGH
AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

Adjacent (AV:A) and attacker-uncontrolled preconditions justify AC:H; PR:N/UI:N per description; improper cert validation yields high confidentiality (C:H) with possible MITM tampering (I:L), no stated availability impact, and no substantiated scope change.

3.1 AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).

CVSS VectorVendor: hpe

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper certificate validation vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer, which could be exploited by an unauthenticated adjacent attacker if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to intercept sensitive information.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity flaw in HPE Networking Fabric Composer's certificate validation could allow an unauthenticated, network-adjacent attacker to intercept sensitive information, though exploitation requires difficult-to-arrange preconditions outside the attacker's control. Leadership should care because this product sits at the heart of network fabric management, and compromised confidentiality there can expose configuration and credential material affecting the integrity of the broader network estate. Practical risk is tempered by high attack complexity and the absence of identified public exploits, but the affected versions are unspecified and no patch is currently available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict network access to Fabric Composer management interfaces to trusted segments, enforce strong segmentation and firewall rules, monitor for certificate anomalies or interception attempts, and engage HPE support for advisory guidance and hotfix tracking.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Prevalence
Low
niche HPE data-center network fabric management software, limited enterprise footprint
Data Quality
2 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS N/A
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

42
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy