Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisCVE.org
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/core: Call wakeup_preempt() for queued tasks during class change
Paul reported recent RCU changes exposed a lost resched where CPU idles with a rcutorture thread waiting while being completely runnable.
Dumping the rq state at the time of idling with runnable tasks showed the following:
rq->next_class = &fair_sched_class rq->nr_running = 1 rq->cfs.h_nr_queued = 0 rq->rt.rt_nr_running = 1
Although the waiting task was an RT task, "rq->next_class" did not point to rt_sched_class and was stuck at the lower priority fair_sched_class.
Inspecting sched_change_end() revealed the following race with __sched_setscheduler() for queued, but non-running tasks:
CPU0 CPU1 == ==
__schedule()
/*
- rq->donor is a fair task that blocks.
- rq->next_class = &fair_sched_class
*/
rq_lock(rq0)
pick_next_task() /* nr_running = 0 */ pick_task_fair() sched_balance_newidle() raw_spin_rq_unlock(rq0) rq_lock(rq0)
activate_task(rq0, p) /* p is a fair task */ rq0->nr_running++; rq0->cfs.h_nr_queued++; wakeup_preempt(rq, p) rq->next_class = &fair_sched_class resched_curr()
rq_unlock(rq0)
__sched_setscheduler(p) /* p is moved to SCHED_RR */ task_rq_lock(p) sched_change_begin()
rq0->cfs.h_nr_queued--; rq0->rt.rt_nr_running++;
sched_change_end() /*
- p->on_rq = 1 (ctx->queued)
- but p is not rq->donor
- (!ctx->running) hence
- resched_curr() is and
- rq->next_class upgrade is
- skipped.
*/
task_rq_unlock()
raw_spin_rq_lock(rq0)
/*
- rq->nr_running = 1
- rq->cfs.h_nr_queued = 0
- rq->rt.rt_nr_running = 1
- rq->next_class = &fair_sched_class
*/
if (rq->cfs.h_nr_queued && ...) /* Above is false */
if (rq_modified_above(this_rq, &fair_sched_class)) /* Also false since rq->next_class is still fair */
/*
- sched_balance_newidle() is considered to
- have failed to pull any fair tasks and no
- other wakeups were detected.
*/ return NULL; /* pick_task_fair() */
pick_task_idle() return rq->idle;
next = rq->idle;
/* Preemption indicators are lost */ clear_tsk_need_resched(prev); clear_preempt_need_resched();
rq->curr = rq->idle;
!!! rq->idle switches in with rq->running == 1 but !need_resched() !!!
In simple words, enqueue, followed by a class change of the newly queued task goes unnoticed in rq->next_class indicator and sched_balance_newidle() sees no fair task, nor any higher priority task enqueued.
The above sequence will lead to CPU idling with a runnable task on the CPU.
Call wakeup_preempt() for ctx->queued cases in sched_change_end() to re-evaluate rq->next_class after class change (ENQUEUE_CLASS) and set the NEED_RESCHED indicator accordingly.
Newidle balance will correctly see an enqueue of a higher priority t ---truncated---
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Lifecycle Timeline
2Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-111957
GHSA-2frc-h2g3-59hw
CVE.org
Exploit-DB