Skip to main content

Ghost Solution Suite EUVDEUVD-2026-110619

| CVE-2026-101034 MEDIUM
Insufficiently Protected Credentials (CWE-522)
2026-10-27 symantec GHSA-wm2j-33wx-q4cw
6.8
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: symantec
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent-network foothold near deployment server
  2. Delivery
    Extract hardcoded key from GSS binaries
  3. Exploit
    Capture or read encrypted credential/sysprep store
  4. Execution
    Decrypt domain/service/run-as passwords
  5. Impact
    Reuse credentials for lateral movement and escalation

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Credential protection in transit/storage
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires two concrete prerequisites: (1) possession of the product's hardcoded cryptographic key, which is embedded in the GSS Deployment Server software and therefore recoverable by any attacker who reverse-engineers it, and (2) access to the credential ciphertext - either by intercepting passwords transmitted by the Deployment Server (consistent with the AV:A adjacent-network vector) or by reading the encrypted domain/service-account, task run-as, and sysprep credential store from a GSS Deployment Server installation. Limiting factors: the attacker needs an adjacent-network position (not arbitrary internet-based access, per AV:A) and must be able to obtain the stored or transmitted ciphertext (reflected by the AT:P Attack Requirement); exposure is confined to environments actually running the affected GSS Deployment Server component. No end-user interaction and no authentication to the product are required (PR:N/UI:N).

Impact

This is a credential-disclosure flaw (CWE-522) in Symantec Ghost Solution Suite's GSS Deployment Server, rooted in a hardcoded cryptographic key that protects stored and transmitted domain/service account passwords, task run-as credentials, and sysprep passwords. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N, VC:H/VI:H/VA:L) describes an adjacent-network attack of low complexity requiring no privileges, but with an explicit Attack Requirement (AT:P) - the attacker must be positioned to obtain the ciphertext (intercept transmission or read the stored blob) in addition to knowing the key. The signals pull in different directions: severity is only medium (6.8) and EPSS is very low (0.15%, 4th percentile), indicating no broad opportunistic exploitation is expected, yet the vuln.today decision label is 'this_month' and the CVSS exploit-maturity metric is set to Proof-of-Concept (E:P), implying some demonstrated exploitability. It is NOT CISA KEV-listed and no exploit reference is included in the sources. Net: this is a real but situational priority - the impact is severe where it lands (disclosure of privileged, often domain-level credentials), but exploitation is gated by adjacent-network positioning against a specialized deployment product, so it behaves as a targeted rather than mass-exploitation risk. The hardcoded-key nature means the key itself is effectively knowable to any attacker who reverse-engineers the product, so the ciphertext-access condition is the true limiting factor. Note a modest tension: EPSS/4.0-base severity read 'medium' while E:P and the 'this_month' label argue for prompt remediation - treat the decision label as the operative urgency signal.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a foothold on the same network segment as a GSS Deployment Server extracts the hardcoded key from the product binaries, then captures credential data in transit or reads the encrypted credential/sysprep store from the installation and decrypts it. The recovered domain/service-account and run-as passwords can then be reused to move laterally and escalate within the Active Directory environment. The CVSS exploit-maturity metric is set to Proof-of-Concept (E:P), but no working exploit reference is provided in the available sources.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 28, 2026

Credential disclosure in Symantec Ghost Solution Suite's GSS Deployment Server lets an attacker who possesses the product's hardcoded cryptographic key decrypt domain and service-account passwords, task run-as credentials and sysprep passwords that the component stores or transmits. The builds identified by EUVD are GSS 3.3.13, GSS 3.3 RU11 and GSS 3.3 RU12 (CPE cpe:2.3:a:broadcom:symantec_ghost_solution_suite), and exploitation is limited to attackers with an adjacent-network position who can also obtain the credential ciphertext - either by intercepting passwords sent by the Deployment Server or by reading the encrypted credential store on an installation. Severity is rated 6.8 under CVSS 4.0 (independent assessment: CVSS 3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L); there is no KEV listing, no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is 0.15% (4th percentile).

RemediationAI

The supplied intelligence does not state a specific fixed build or patch version, so treat the Broadcom advisory at https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/39440 as the authoritative source for the patched release covering GSS 3.3.13, GSS 3.3 RU11 and GSS 3.3 RU12, and confirm the fixed version there before upgrading. Because the key is hardcoded and therefore recoverable from any Deployment Server installation, replacing the software alone does not restore secrecy of secrets already protected with it: rotate every domain and service-account password, task run-as credential and sysprep password that has ever been stored in or transmitted by an affected Deployment Server, in order of the privileges those accounts hold. Until a fixed build is deployed, reduce exposure by restricting who can reach the Deployment Server on the adjacent network and by hardening the credential store (tight ACLs on the GSS Deployment Server data directory, full-disk encryption on that host) so the ciphertext is harder to read - the trade-off is added operational overhead and tighter network segmentation of deployment traffic, and neither control removes the underlying hardcoded-key weakness. Detection should focus on anomalous access to Deployment Server credential files and on unexpected authentication using the service, run-as or sysprep accounts.

Affected VersionsENISA

Symantec Ghost Solution Suite GSS_3.3.13
Symantec Ghost Solution Suite GSS_3.3_RU11
Symantec Ghost Solution Suite GSS_3.3_RU12

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-522 (Insufficiently Protected Credentials): GSS Deployment Server relies on a hardcoded cryptographic key to protect secrets it manages, so the confidentiality of those secrets depends on a secret that ships inside the software and is therefore recoverable by anyone who reverse-engineers the Deployment Server binaries. Once that key is in hand, the encrypted domain/service-account passwords, task run-as credentials and sysprep passwords become readable wherever the attacker can reach the ciphertext - in the credential store of a GSS Deployment Server installation or in passwords the Deployment Server transmits across the network. The CVSS 4.0 vector AV:A places the attacker on an adjacent network rather than the open internet, and AT:P reflects that a specific attack requirement must be met on top of network positioning (in the independent assessment, the need to actually acquire the stored or transmitted ciphertext). PR:N/UI:N mean no product authentication and no victim interaction are needed, while VC:H/VI:H/VA:L reflect high confidentiality and integrity loss from credential theft against limited direct availability impact, and the subsequent S:P/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:H scoring reflects that stolen domain, service and sysprep credentials are likely to be reusable downstream against higher-value systems.

Know when Symantec Ghost Solution Suite gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (symantec) PRIMARY 6.8 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/S:P/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:H/U:Amber
vuln.today AI 8.3 HIGH

AV:A and no auth (PR:N) because the key is hardcoded/knowable and the real gate is adjacent access to the ciphertext; C:H for credential disclosure, with I:H/A:L reflecting that the leaked privileged accounts enable modification.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (symantec).

CVSS VectorVendor: symantec

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

An attacker who obtained the hardcoded key could decrypt domain/service account passwords, task run-as credentials, and sysprep passwords stored in or transmitted by GSS Deployment Server installation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 96% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise OS imaging/deployment tool, common in IT shops but not ubiquitous
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

34
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +34
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy