Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach enabled unauthenticated rekey/generate-root endpoint
-
ExploitComplete operation while response audit logging fails
-
ImpactPrivileged action completes with no response audit record
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A09:2025 - Security Logging & Alerting Failures
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Sufficient logging implementation
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the instance has explicitly set disable_unauthed_generate_root_endpoints=false and/or disable_unauthed_rekey_endpoints=false - these endpoints (sys/generate-root/attempt and /update, sys/rekey/init, /update, /verify, and sys/rekey-recovery-key/init, /update, /verify) are disabled by default since OpenBao 2.5.3. In addition, the audit backend must succeed in writing the request entry but fail in writing the response entry for the gap to occur. Limiting factors: the vulnerable endpoints are off by default, so standard deployments are unaffected; the request audit entry is still written, so only the response record is missing; and the only impact is reduced forensic visibility, not disclosure or modification of secrets. |
| Impact | This is a low-priority issue across every available signal. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 score is 2.1 with vulnerable-system impact limited to VI:L (loss of a response audit record); confidentiality and availability impact are N. The vuln.today decision label is 'monitor', not act_now or emergency. No KEV listing is present, no EPSS score was provided in the input, and no PoC or exploit reference appears anywhere in the data, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The 4.0 vector uses AT:P, reflecting that the flaw only manifests when request audit logging succeeds but response audit logging fails - a condition the attacker does not reliably control. One notable tension: the affected endpoints are described as 'unauthenticated,' yet the vendor vector sets PR:H; this reflects that the endpoints are disabled by default since OpenBao 2.5.3 and must be explicitly re-enabled in configuration, a deployment precondition rather than an attacker-held privilege - verify this interpretation against the GHSA advisory. The practical impact is a forensic/detection gap, not direct compromise, so this is a genuinely low-severity hardening fix rather than an urgent threat. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker reaches an OpenBao instance that has explicitly enabled the unauthenticated generate-root or rekey endpoints (non-default), and completes a root-token-generation or rekey operation at a moment when the request audit log succeeds but the response audit log write fails. The completed operation then leaves no response audit record, hindering later forensic detection of the privileged action. No public exploit code or PoC reference is present in the supplied data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 22, 2026
OpenBao's unauthenticated root-token generation and rekey endpoints can complete operations without a corresponding response audit record when request audit logging succeeds but response audit logging fails, reducing forensic visibility. OpenBao versions before 2.6.4 and 2.7.x before 2.7.1 are affected, but the impacted endpoints are disabled by default since OpenBao 2.5.3 and must be explicitly enabled for exploitation. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is a low-severity logging gap rather than a path to secret disclosure or modification.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to OpenBao 2.7.1 for the 2.7.x line or OpenBao 2.6.4 for the 2.6.x line. On OpenBao 2.5.3 and later, keep disable_unauthed_rekey_endpoints and disable_unauthed_generate_root_endpoints set to true, which is the default; only temporarily enable them if operationally required. The vendor advisory at https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-q74w-hv5x-6hxf documents the fix and workaround.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
OpenBao is an open-source secrets-management system, and this issue is classified as CWE-778, insufficient logging. The affected API paths are sys/generate-root/attempt, sys/generate-root/update, sys/rekey/init, sys/rekey/update, sys/rekey/verify, sys/rekey-recovery-key/init, sys/rekey-recovery-key/update, and sys/rekey-recovery-key/verify. The flaw is specifically an audit logging gap: the request audit entry is written, but if response audit logging fails, no response entry is written for the operation. The trigger conditions described by the vendor are that one of these endpoints must be enabled and that request audit logging must succeed while response audit logging fails. Since OpenBao 2.5.3, these endpoints are unavailable by default unless disable_unauthed_rekey_endpoints or disable_unauthed_generate_root_endpoints is explicitly set to false. The impact is reduced forensic visibility, not disclosure or modification of secrets.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
AC:H because the trigger needs non-default enabled endpoints plus a response-audit-log failure the attacker cannot control; PR:N as the endpoints are unauthenticated; only an audit record is lost, so I:L and C:N/A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (vulncheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: vulncheck
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
OpenBao before 2.6.4 and 2.7.x before 2.7.1 fails to write response audit entries for the unauthenticated sys/generate-root, sys/rekey, and sys/rekey-recovery-key endpoints when request audit logging succeeds but response audit logging fails. An attacker using these endpoints can complete root token generation or rekey operations without a corresponding response audit record, hindering forensic detection.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-108282
GHSA-wcpv-xrx9-27pw
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB