Skip to main content

Oracle Agile PLM EUVDEUVD-2026-105889

| CVE-2026-101473 HIGH
2026-10-20 secalert_us@oracle.com GHSA-69x9-6vpc-x66j
8.1
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach PLM app over HTTP
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted malicious request
  3. Exploit
    Satisfy high-complexity trigger conditions
  4. Execution
    Exploit flaw in Product Quality Management
  5. Impact
    Achieve full product takeover

Vulnerability Assessment

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation targets the Product Quality Management component of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process 6.2.4, reachable remotely over HTTP by an unauthenticated attacker (PR:N, UI:N). The key limiting factor is high attack complexity (AC:H), which Oracle explicitly characterizes as 'Difficult to exploit' - success depends on conditions the attacker does not control, such as specific server state, timing, or race conditions, rather than a reliable single-request trigger. No special product configuration is named in the description, but only version 6.2.4 is stated as affected; the absence of a disclosed root cause (CWE N/A) means the precise triggering condition cannot be specified from available data.

Impact

Signals are mixed and point to a credible but not urgent priority. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 8.1 (High) with vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - network-reachable and unauthenticated (PR:N), requiring no user interaction, with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact ('takeover' per Oracle). The single tempering factor is AC:H (high attack complexity), which Oracle's own language ('Difficult to exploit') reinforces - successful exploitation likely depends on conditions outside the attacker's control (timing, configuration, or specific state). No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active or automatable exploitation. The net picture is a genuinely high-impact, remotely reachable flaw whose real-world risk is dampened by exploitation difficulty and the absence of any weaponization signal. One inconsistency to note: the input Tag labels this 'Information Disclosure,' yet the description and the C:H/I:H/A:H impact describe full product takeover, not mere disclosure - treat the tag as understating impact. CWE is N/A and no technical root-cause detail is provided, so the exact flaw class cannot be confirmed.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote, unauthenticated attacker reaches the Oracle Agile PLM for Process 6.2.4 application over HTTP and sends a crafted request sequence that exploits the flaw to gain full control of the application. Because Oracle rates the attack complexity as high, the attacker likely must satisfy additional non-trivial conditions (timing or specific server state) for the attack to succeed. No public exploit code is known at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 21, 2026

Oracle Agile PLM for Process 6.2.4 can be taken over through its Product Quality Management component by unauthenticated remote HTTP requests, but the exploit path is rated high complexity and difficult rather than reliably repeatable. Oracle's October 2026 Critical Patch Update lists the issue with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact and no CWE mapping, and no public exploit or CISA KEV entry was identified in the provided intelligence at time of analysis. The combination of network reachability, no privileges or user interaction, and takeover-level impact makes this a high-impact but condition-dependent risk for supply-chain quality environments.

RemediationAI

Apply Oracle's October 2026 Critical Patch Update, referenced at https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2026.html, as the primary fix; the input does not specify an exact patched build number, so verify the fixed 6.2.4 build listed in the advisory before closing. If patching must be staged, reduce exposure by placing the PLM web tier behind a VPN, zero-trust proxy, or reverse proxy and restricting HTTP access to Product Quality Management endpoints to trusted users and networks, with the trade-off of reduced remote usability. Add WAF or virtual-patching rules for anomalous unauthenticated requests to PLM HTTP endpoints, recognizing potential false positives and incomplete coverage because the root cause is undisclosed. Monitor PLM HTTP logs for unusual unauthenticated requests as a detection measure, and disable unused Product Quality Management features only where business processes allow, since doing so can break quality workflows.

Affected VersionsENISA

Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process 6.2.4

Affected Packages

euvd oracle_agile_product_lifecycle_management_for_process no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process is a supply-chain quality and product-lifecycle application; the affected Product Quality Management component is exposed over HTTP to web clients and handles quality records, specifications, and workflow data. The provided data gives no CWE mapping, so the underlying defect class is undisclosed; the CVSS vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N describes a remotely reachable, unauthenticated attack that succeeds only when conditions outside the attacker's control line up, which Oracle characterizes as difficult to exploit. That high complexity is consistent with a state-, timing-, or race-dependent server-side flaw rather than a simple single request, and successful exploitation yields high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact consistent with takeover. The Information Disclosure tag should not be read as limiting impact, because the assessed vector indicates full C/I/A loss.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Oracle states unauthenticated HTTP access (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) but describes it as difficult to exploit (AC:H), and 'takeover' justifies C:H/I:H/A:H with scope unchanged.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionNVD

Vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: Product Quality Management). The supported version that is affected is 6.2.4. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Oracle Agile PLM for Process 6.2.4, specifically its Product Quality Management component, creates a high-severity takeover exposure for supply-chain quality operations, with potential full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability if exploited. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the difficult exploit path lowers immediate likelihood, but the absence of a vendor-released patch means leadership should prioritize exposure reduction until remediation is available.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include network segmentation and restricting HTTP access to Oracle Agile PLM for Process 6.2.4 Product Quality Management endpoints, enforcing least privilege, monitoring for anomalous requests, and applying the vendor patch when available.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 70% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche industry-specific Oracle supply-chain PLM product, limited deployment footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

40
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy