Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessDeliver malicious app to device
-
ExploitAbuse improper permission validation
-
ExecutionOverwrite restricted files
-
ImpactTamper with protected data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Least privilege enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires local code execution on the device - specifically, an attacker-controlled or malicious app process running on iOS/iPadOS (before 26.7, and the 27 line), macOS (before 27), or visionOS (before 27). The flaw is a permissions-validation weakness (CWE-269) that lets such a local process overwrite files it should not have write access to. Limiting factors: there is no remote vector (AV:L), so the attacker must first get code onto the device (e.g., via App Store sideloading, a malicious app, or chaining from another bug); impact is confined to integrity (file overwrite), with no direct confidentiality or availability loss per the CVSS vector. Patched OS versions fully remediate the issue. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-priority issue rather than an urgent emergency. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N, score 6.2) indicates a LOCAL attack vector with low complexity and no privileges or user interaction required, impacting integrity only (ability to overwrite restricted files) with no confidentiality or availability loss. Because the vector is AV:L, exploitation requires the attacker to already be running code on the device (e.g., a malicious or compromised app), which substantially limits remote mass-exploitation potential. No EPSS score was provided, so exploitation-probability modeling cannot be incorporated. The CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV and no public POC is referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis - do not treat this as actively exploited. The SSVC framework cannot be fully applied (no automatable/exploitation-status data supplied), but the local vector implies exploitation is not automatable at scale. Net: a real, fixable integrity/privilege flaw worth patching in normal cycles given Apple's enormous install base, but not a drop-everything issue absent evidence of exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A user installs or is tricked into running a malicious application on an iPhone, iPad, Mac, or Vision Pro device. The app abuses the improper permission validation to write to or overwrite files that should be restricted from it, potentially corrupting protected data or tampering with privileged configuration. No public exploit code is known, and the attacker must already have local code execution on the device. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 20, 2026
Local code execution on iOS and iPadOS (before 26.7 and the 27 line), macOS Golden Gate (before 27), and visionOS (before 27) can let an attacker-controlled app process overwrite restricted files, breaking file-system integrity protections. The issue is an improper privilege-management and permissions-validation weakness (CWE-269) scored 6.2 with a local-only vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), so it is unauthenticated once code is running but cannot be reached remotely - a malicious or sideloaded app must first execute on the device. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and no KEV confirmation; Apple has released vendor patches in iOS 26.7/iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27/iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, and visionOS 27.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, or iOS 27 and iPadOS 27; macOS Golden Gate 27; and visionOS 27, as documented in Apple advisories support.apple.com/en-us/149034, 149035, 149038, and 149041. Because exploitation requires local code execution, compensating controls should focus on preventing untrusted code from running before patching: enforce MDM app allowlisting and block sideloading or unmanaged app installs (trade-off: reduced user flexibility and additional administrative overhead), remove or sandbox untrusted apps on higher-risk devices (trade-off: potential disruption to legitimate workflows), and treat devices running the vulnerable OS versions as requiring prioritized update cycles. Patched OS versions fully remediate the issue; no vendor workaround beyond upgrading is identified in the available data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw sits in Apple's platform permission-checking logic, which is intended to stop an app sandbox process from writing to files outside its authorized container or protected system locations. CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management) captures the root cause: validation of the caller's entitlements or file-access rights is insufficient, so a local process can perform a write operation it should be denied. The CPE strings confirm coverage across Apple's OS family - ios_and_ipados, macos (marketed here as macOS Golden Gate), and visionos - and the EUVD version ranges show all builds below 26.7 and 27 for iOS/iPadOS, below 27 for macOS, and below 27 for visionOS. The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N indicates the attacker needs local code execution but no additional privileges and no user interaction, with impact limited to integrity (arbitrary restricted-file overwrite); there is no direct confidentiality or availability impact in the assessed vector, and exploitation cannot cross a privilege or sandbox boundary beyond the file-write primitive.
Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Local app context required so AV:L; any unprivileged app can trigger it (PR:N, UI:N, AC:L); impact is restricted-file overwrite, so I:H with C:N and A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (apple).
CVSS VectorVendor: apple
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
A permissions issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, visionOS 27. A local attacker may be able to overwrite restricted files.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope
Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe
Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV
The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)
A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent
In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen
A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth
This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i
A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut
Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this
EUVD-2026-104720
GHSA-c448-32wg-fc83
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB