Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with low-privilege account
-
DeliveryRequest connection data with View permission
-
ExploitReceive unredacted add-on properties
-
ExecutionExtract cleartext add-on passwords
-
ImpactReuse credentials for lateral movement
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an authenticated Devolutions Server account holding at least View permission on connections whose configuration includes add-ons containing stored passwords; requesting that connection's data returns the add-on properties unredacted. Exploitation is limited to existing authenticated users (no anonymous/unauthenticated path) and only yields secrets for connections the user can already view, and only applies to versions 2026.3.8.0 and earlier (fixed in 2026.3.10). No user interaction by a victim is needed, but the attacker must already possess valid low-privilege credentials. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-priority information-disclosure issue, not a critical emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N = 6.5 Medium) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw that nonetheless REQUIRES an authenticated account (PR:L), bounding the attacker population to existing low-privilege users. All corroborating signals point the same low-urgency direction: CISA SSVC records Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, and Technical Impact=partial, and no EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input (so: no public exploit identified at time of analysis). The only elevated metric is confidentiality (C:H), reflecting that the leaked data is sensitive credentials (add-on passwords). There is no conflict between signals - CVSS, SSVC, and the description all agree this is an authenticated insider-access authorization flaw rather than a remotely-automatable mass-exploitation threat. Note the input 'Authentication Bypass' tag conflicts with the actual nature of the bug (CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization, exploited BY an authenticated user), which should not be read as an unauthenticated bypass. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A legitimate low-privilege Devolutions Server user who has been granted only View permission on a connection requests that connection's data through the normal API/UI and receives the add-on properties with passwords returned in cleartext rather than redacted. The user thereby harvests credentials they were never authorized to see, enabling lateral movement using those recovered secrets. No public exploit code is identified, and exploitation requires low complexity (AC:L) but a pre-existing authenticated account (PR:L). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 16, 2026
Incorrect authorization in Devolutions Server 2026.3.8.0 and earlier lets an authenticated user who holds only View permission on a connection retrieve stored add-on passwords, because the connection data returned to the client includes add-on properties unredacted rather than masked. Exploitation requires a pre-existing low-privilege account and only exposes secrets for connections that account can already view, so the impact is high-confidentiality but scoped to credentials stored in add-on properties; no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and there is no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV). The vendor has released a fix, making this a genuine but moderate-priority information-disclosure issue rather than a critical emergency.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to Devolutions Server 2026.3.10 - the vendor-released fix for this issue (reported by DEVOLUTIONS under advisory DEVO-2026-0036, https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0036/); per the EUVD range, all versions below 2026.3.10 should be treated as vulnerable, so patching rather than configuration tuning is the primary action. Where immediate upgrade is not possible, compensating controls with real trade-offs are: audit and remove stored passwords from add-on properties on sensitive connections (application functionality depending on those add-on credentials will break, and the values must be re-entered after patching), and tighten role assignments so that View permission on connections containing password-bearing add-ons is limited to users who genuinely need those secrets (this reduces the affected population but does not close the flaw for View-permitted users). Because exploitation requires valid low-privilege credentials and yields only secrets for connections the user can already see, monitoring for unusual bulk retrieval of connection data by low-privilege accounts is worthwhile, but it is a detective control and not a substitute for the 2026.3.10 upgrade. There is no vendor-released patch for versions prior to 2026.3.10 other than that upgrade path.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization): Devolutions Server enforces redaction of sensitive fields when serializing connection configuration back to a requesting client, but that redaction logic is not applied consistently to add-on properties attached to a connection. Add-ons can carry their own stored credentials, including passwords, and when a user with View permission requests the connection's data, those add-on properties are returned in cleartext instead of being masked, effectively granting read access to secrets the user's role was never meant to expose. The issue sits in the server-side permission/redaction enforcement layer for connection and add-on objects rather than in cryptography or transport; the CPE vector (cpe:2.3:a:devolutions:server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) reflects a version-range match against the product with no platform qualifiers. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N confirms the attack is network-reachable, needs low-privilege authentication (PR:L, so an authenticated rather than anonymous attacker), requires no victim interaction, and yields high confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability effect. ENISA's EUVD records the vulnerable range as Server 0 through versions below 2026.3.10.
Know when Server gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Network API reachable (AV:N), no special conditions (AC:L), but requires an authenticated low-privilege View account (PR:L); impact is password disclosure only, so C:H with I:N/A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (DEVOLUTIONS).
CVSS VectorVendor: DEVOLUTIONS
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Incorrect authorization in add-on properties in Devolutions Server 2026.3.8.0 and earlier allows an authenticated user with only View permission to obtain add-on passwords via the unredacted add-on properties returned in connection data.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Traccar Traccar Server version 4.0 and earlier contains a CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injectio
Account takeover in self-hosted Bitwarden Server before 2026.6.0 lets a low-privileged organization member steal any oth
Full user impersonation in the Laci Synchroni sync server (backend prior to 1.2.3) lets an attacker take over any accoun
Provider service users in Bitwarden Server Cloud can hijack arbitrary organizations via unauthorized API endpoint access
NoMachine Server is affected by Integer Overflow. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is low attack compl
NoMachine Server is affected by Buffer Overflow. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is low attack comple
Authentication bypass in Bitwarden Server versions prior to 2026.4.1 allows authenticated users with SCIM management pri
JetAudio jetCast Server 2.0 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the Log Directory configuration fiel
Credential-holding attackers can completely bypass TOTP two-factor authentication on Sync-in Server versions prior to 2.
A broken authentication vulnerability in 4D SAS 4D Server software v17, v18, v19 R7, and earlier allows attackers to sen
An information disclosure vulnerability in 4D SAS 4D Server Application v17, v18, v19 R7 and earlier allows attackers to
Privilege escalation in self-hosted Bitwarden Server before 2026.5.0 lets an authenticated organization member holding a
EUVD-2026-102875
GHSA-hrwp-c296-c5g8
NVD
CVE.org
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB