Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessSend email with crafted attachment
-
DeliveryGateway AMP processes attachment
-
ExploitTrigger path traversal in file handling
-
ExecutionWrite arbitrary file to OS
-
ImpactExecute commands as root
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Relative path traversal prevention
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) feature's file reputation service be enabled on the Cisco Secure Email Gateway; this is the specific feature state named in the advisory as the root cause of improper attachment handling. When that service is active, exploitation needs only that an attacker be able to send an email with a crafted attachment through the device (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) - no authentication, no recipient interaction, and no non-default network access. The practical limiting factor is purely configuration: gateways without file reputation enabled are not affected, so defenders should inventory which appliances have AMP file reputation active to scope exposure. |
| Impact | This is a genuine top-priority vulnerability, not a high-CVSS-but-low-risk artifact. The vendor-supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 9.8) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated, no-interaction flaw, and the description's mechanics corroborate it: an attacker merely sends an email with a crafted attachment through the gateway, with no credentials and no victim action required. CWE-23 (relative path traversal) combined with the stated outcome - arbitrary file write escalating to command execution with root privileges - makes the technical impact total on the affected appliance. The signals are internally consistent with no contradictions between the vector and the prose. The tempering factors are the absence of exploitation-probability signals: there is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept in the provided data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The only exploitation precondition is that the AMP file-reputation service be enabled - a common configuration on these gateways. Net assessment: maximal technical severity and trivial exploitability warrant emergency patching, while the lack of KEV/EPSS/POC signals means active exploitation is not currently confirmed, so this is 'patch immediately on severity/exposure grounds' rather than 'confirmed under attack.' |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An external attacker sends an ordinary-looking email with a specially crafted malicious attachment to any recipient behind an affected Cisco Secure Email Gateway that has AMP file reputation enabled. As the gateway processes the attachment, improper path handling lets the attacker write arbitrary files to the underlying OS and ultimately execute commands as root. No authentication, no user interaction, and no public exploit code is required or known at this time. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Cisco Secure Email Gateway allows attackers to write arbitrary files and execute commands as root by sending a crafted email attachment when the AMP file reputation service is enabled. The flaw, a relative path traversal (CWE-23) in attachment handling, requires no authentication or user interaction, but only gateways with file reputation active are vulnerable. No public exploit or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, though the critical CVSS score of 9.8 and the configuration prerequisite make it a priority for defenders to inventory exposed appliances.
RemediationAI
No specific fixed version is provided in the available data, so the primary remediation is to apply the vendor patch as directed by Cisco's security advisory (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-esa-afw-zqYJkjxp). Until a patch can be applied, disable the AMP file reputation service on affected gateways; this removes the vulnerable code path but reduces malware detection efficacy and may violate organizational security policies. As an alternative or additional compensating control, implement strict email attachment filtering to block potentially malicious file types, or restrict the gateway's ability to process external email from untrusted sources. Note that these mitigations have trade-offs: disabling AMP reduces defense-in-depth, and attachment filtering may block legitimate business communications. Monitor the Cisco advisory for updated fixed version information.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability resides in the Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) feature of Cisco Secure Email Gateway (formerly Email Security Appliance). When the AMP file reputation service is enabled, the gateway mishandles email attachments, leading to a relative path traversal (CWE-23). An attacker can craft an attachment whose filename or path traversal sequences escape the intended directory, allowing arbitrary file writes on the underlying operating system. With root-level file write access, the attacker can then plant malicious files (e.g., cron jobs, startup scripts) to execute commands with root privileges. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms remote, unauthenticated exploitation with no user interaction, though the configuration dependency on AMP file reputation is a key gating factor. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:cisco:cisco_secure_email:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates that all versions of the product may be affected until patched.
Know when Cisco Secure Email gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Unauthenticated email attachment delivery gives AV:N/PR:N/UI:N; arbitrary file write to root command execution yields C:H/I:H/A:H; impact confined to the appliance so S:U.
Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).
CVSS VectorVendor: cisco
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
A vulnerability in the Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) feature of Cisco Secure Email Gateway could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to write arbitrary files on the underlying operating system.
This vulnerability is due to improper handling of email attachments when the file reputation service is enabled. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending an email that contains a crafted attachment through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write arbitrary files and execute commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system.
Articles & Coverage 1
Executive ViewAI
Cisco Secure Email Gateway is affected by a critical remote code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-76519) that allows attackers to execute commands as root, potentially leading to full compromise of email infrastructure and sensitive data. Organizations using this product with the AMP file reputation service enabled are at risk, and while no public exploit has been identified, the severity warrants immediate attention to protect email communications and prevent lateral movement.
Disable AMP file reputation service on affected Cisco Secure Email Gateway appliances; if not possible, isolate appliances from untrusted networks and monitor for indicators of compromise.
Threat Model
5 threats: Elevation of Privilege, Tampering, Information Disclosure and 2 more
4-step attack chain with trust boundaries and controls
Full threat model - attack chain, trust boundaries, controls per stage and evidence - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
More in Cisco Secure Email
View allUnauthenticated remote command execution with root privileges affects Cisco Secure Email Gateway running affected AsyncO
Path traversal vulnerabilities (CWE-23) in Cisco Secure Email Gateway (ESA) and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager (SMA)
Unauthenticated remote attackers who can reach a Cisco Secure Email Gateway or Secure Email and Web Manager deployment c
Improper-neutralization flaws (CWE-707) in Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager - disclosed
Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager ship a hardening release that fixes multiple internall
Plaintext recovery from S/MIME-encrypted email is possible in Cisco Secure Email due to insufficient message integrity v
Plaintext recovery from S/MIME-encrypted email is possible in Cisco Secure Email due to insufficient validation of messa
EUVD-2026-101420
GHSA-6rc3-jwq8-jm3v
NVD
CVE.org
CISA KEV
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB