Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Deliver crafted font/shaping data over network
  2. Delivery
    Victim component parses malformed data
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap buffer overflow in Text Shaping
  4. Execution
    Corrupt heap and hijack control flow
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The vulnerable code path requires the Windows Text Shaping component to process attacker-supplied font or text-shaping data - triggered whenever an application renders untrusted content containing crafted/embedded fonts or shaping instructions (documents, web pages, messages, or network-delivered files). The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates no authentication and, as scored, no user interaction, implying an attacker-controlled data stream can reach the parser automatically in affected configurations. Limiting factors: exploitation depends on a Windows application actually invoking Text Shaping on the malicious data, and reliability may require heap-grooming to achieve code execution rather than a crash; exact affected Windows versions were not confirmed from the available data, so unaffected/patched builds limit the real-world exposure.

Impact

All provided signals point to a high-priority vulnerability. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation requiring no privileges and no user interaction, with full H/H/H impact yielding the 9.8 base score - the classic profile of a wormable remote code execution flaw. Windows Text Shaping (DWrite/font-shaping) is a widely reachable component often exercised when rendering untrusted content (documents, web pages, embedded fonts), which raises exposure. However, several real-risk signals are MISSING from the input and must not be assumed: no EPSS score was provided, KEV status is not listed (treat as not confirmed), and no POC/exploit code is referenced. Therefore this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' despite the critical CVSS. Net: a genuine high priority to patch given the pre-authentication RCE profile, but there is currently no evidence of active exploitation or public exploit availability - patch urgency rests on severity and the component's broad reachability, not on observed in-the-wild activity.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker delivers content containing a maliciously crafted font or shaping data (e.g., via a web page, document, or network-delivered file) that is processed by the Windows Text Shaping component. When the victim's system parses the malformed data, a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) is triggered, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the rendering process. No public proof-of-concept is identified in the provided data.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 1.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Text Shaping component can let an unauthenticated remote attacker execute arbitrary code by delivering crafted font or text-shaping data to an application that renders untrusted content. It is scored 9.8 under CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (CWE-122), i.e. no authentication and, as scored, no user interaction, though real-world exploitation depends on an affected Windows application actually invoking Text Shaping on the malicious data and reliable code execution may require heap grooming rather than a simple crash. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV entry were identified at time of analysis, and the specific affected Windows versions were not confirmed from the available data.

RemediationAI

No exact fix version was provided in the available data, so the primary action is to apply the Windows security update published through the Microsoft Security Response Center guide for CVE-2026-97814 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-97814), using the affected-build and KB information there to determine which builds are patched; patch status is best described as available per the vendor advisory, with the specific release not independently confirmed here. Until that update is deployed on every affected build, treat the component as remotely reachable through untrusted content and reduce exposure with concrete compensating controls: restrict or block processing of untrusted and embedded fonts in high-risk channels (disable embedded/web font rendering in browsers and document viewers, and block font files from untrusted network locations and email attachments), and, on Windows builds that support the font-blocking policy, enable untrusted font blocking (EnableUntrustedFontBlocking / the untrusted-font group policy) so system processes do not parse non-system fonts, accepting the trade-off that legitimate third-party or custom fonts will fail to render and some line-of-business and document workflows may break. Enterprise-side mitigations include network segmentation and filtering to prevent attacker-supplied documents from reaching interactive workstations, tightening attachment and download controls, and prioritizing rapid patching of internet- and content-facing hosts; note that exploit reliability may require heap grooming, so a crash-free exploitation attempt is not a reliable indicator that a given build is immune.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in Windows Text Shaping, the font and glyph-layout processing path used when the operating system parses font tables and computes glyph positioning for text rendering (the same broad class of parsers associated with DirectWrite/Uniscribe-style shaping engines and OpenType font handling). The root cause class is a memory-safety defect in which a length, offset, or glyph-count value derived from attacker-influenced font or shaping input is not validated against the destination heap buffer, so an over-long copy or under-sized allocation corrupts adjacent heap structures; subsequent control of that corrupted memory can be converted into code execution, typically requiring heap grooming to make the overwrite deterministic. Because the vulnerable parser is reached through data rather than a listening service, the attack surface is any code path that shapes untrusted text, including network-delivered documents, web content with embedded or downloaded fonts, messages, and file shares, which matches the AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N vector supplied in the vendor data and our independent assessment. No CPE strings were included in the input, so the exact set of affected Windows builds (and whether this affects Win32 rendering, kernel-side font parsing, or both) could not be enumerated from the available evidence; the only authoritative product-mapping source provided is Microsoft's MSRC update guide entry for CVE-2026-97814.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
ENISA EUVD HIGH
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Network-delivered malformed font/shaping data reaches the parser with no auth or interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), and heap-overflow RCE yields full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:22 nvd
CRITICAL 9.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Text Shaping allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows systems that process untrusted fonts or text-shaping data are exposed to a critical remote code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-97814). Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated attacker to take control of affected endpoints, leading to data theft, ransomware deployment, or lateral movement across the organization. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but leadership should prioritize patching because the vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.0%
Top 38% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core text-rendering component present in all Windows installations
Threat Intel
2
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 1.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

55
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: +5

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy