Skip to main content

Remote Desktop Client EUVDEUVD-2026-100388

| CVE-2026-103575 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-xw53-j3vm-v5fh
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure victim to malicious RDP server
  2. Exploit
    Deliver crafted server-side RDP traffic
  3. Execution
    Trigger use-after-free in client
  4. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code on victim host

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to establish an RDP session with an attacker-controlled or compromised Remote Desktop server (the UI:R / user-interaction requirement) - typically by opening a malicious .rdp file or connecting to a rogue endpoint - after which malicious server responses trigger the use-after-free in the client. No attacker-side authentication is required (PR:N), and code executes in the context of the connecting user. The limiting factors are that the attacker cannot reach the client unsolicited: a user must actively initiate the outbound connection, so environments that restrict outbound RDP to trusted servers materially reduce real-world risk.

Impact

This is a legitimately serious client-side vulnerability but not an emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - but the UI:R flag is the decisive mitigating signal: this is a Remote Desktop CLIENT bug (CWE-416 use-after-free), so the attacker does not reach the victim directly; the victim must initiate or be lured into an RDP session with an attacker-controlled or malicious server. No EPSS score, CISA KEV entry, or public POC was included in the provided data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. The only reference is the Microsoft MSRC advisory. Net: treat as a high-priority patch for fleets where users connect out to untrusted RDP endpoints, but the required user interaction makes mass, drive-by exploitation unlikely versus the 8.8 score's first impression. Note a signal conflict: the input Tags include 'Denial Of Service' while the description and CVSS impacts (C:H/I:H/A:H) describe remote code execution, not merely DoS - treat the DoS tag as incomplete rather than authoritative.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker stands up a malicious or compromised RDP server and lures a victim into connecting to it (e.g., via a crafted .rdp file, phishing link, or malicious remote-connection prompt). When the Remote Desktop Client processes the malicious server responses, a use-after-free is triggered, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine with the client user's privileges. No public proof-of-concept is identified in the provided data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Remote code execution in Remote Desktop Client can be triggered when a user connects to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server, due to a use-after-free in the client. The attacker does not need credentials (PR:N), but the victim must initiate the outbound RDP session (UI:R), so environments that restrict outbound RDP to trusted hosts are less exposed; successful exploitation runs code in the context of the connecting user. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; this is a serious client-side vulnerability but not an emergency because the attacker cannot reach the client unsolicited.

RemediationAI

Apply the update identified in Microsoft's MSRC advisory for CVE-2026-103575 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-103575); the input data does not provide an exact fix version, so use the vendor advisory to determine the appropriate patched Remote Desktop Client build for each platform. Because exploitation requires the victim to initiate an outbound RDP session to an attacker-controlled or compromised server, prioritize compensating controls that restrict outbound RDP to trusted hosts: block outbound TCP 3389 at the perimeter or via host firewall for users who do not need external RDP, enforce RDP Gateway or allowlisted destination policies, and train users not to open unsolicited .rdp files or connect to untrusted endpoints. These controls can break legitimate remote-access workflows, so scope them to high-risk populations or pair them with approved remote-access alternatives; application allowlisting and least privilege reduce the impact of successful code execution in the connecting user's context, and network segmentation limits where that context can be used.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Remote Desktop Client is Microsoft's client-side component for the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), and this issue is a CWE-416 use-after-free in which a memory object is freed but later referenced while processing server-controlled RDP responses. The CVSS:3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw that needs no attacker authentication but requires the victim to initiate an RDP connection, after which crafted server data can corrupt memory and lead to code execution with the connecting user's privileges. The accompanying tags (Denial Of Service, Use After Free, Memory Corruption) are consistent with a client parsing untrusted server responses; the independent assessment clarifies that the attacker must control or compromise the RDP server side and cannot reach the client unsolicited, so exploitation depends on a user-initiated outbound session such as opening a malicious .rdp file or connecting to a rogue endpoint. No CPE strings were provided in the input data, so exact affected builds must be confirmed via Microsoft's MSRC advisory.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Client processes attacker-controlled network data over RDP (AV:N/AC:L), no attacker auth (PR:N), but victim must connect to the malicious server (UI:R); UAF yields full RCE as the user (C/I/A:H, scope unchanged).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:17 nvd
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Remote Desktop Client is affected by a high-severity remote code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-103575) that can compromise an employee's system when they connect to a malicious RDP server. This puts any staff member who initiates outbound RDP sessions at risk of code execution under their own user privileges, potentially leading to data theft or further network compromise. With no vendor patch available and no public exploit identified, leadership should prioritize restricting outbound RDP traffic to trusted hosts as an immediate risk reduction measure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Restrict outbound RDP to trusted hosts via firewall rules; block outbound TCP 3389 at the perimeter; implement network segmentation; enable application allowlisting; monitor for anomalous RDP connections; educate users about connecting only to trusted RDP servers; consider disabling the RDP client where not required.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 45% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Microsoft Remote Desktop client ships with essentially every Windows installation
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy