Skip to main content

VHD Miniport Driver EUVDEUVD-2026-100381

| CVE-2026-103555 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-vpgp-h7c8-4p6j
7.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain low-privileged local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious VHD/IOCTL input
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap overflow in VHD Miniport Driver
  4. Execution
    Corrupt kernel heap and execute code
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess authenticated low-privileged local access (PR:L) to a Windows system whose Virtual Hard Disk (VHD) Miniport Driver is reachable - i.e., the attacker must be able to submit I/O (e.g., mount/attach operations or device IOCTLs) to the VHD storage stack. Exploitation is further limited by High attack complexity (AC:H): as a heap-based buffer overflow, reliable control typically depends on heap-layout grooming or winning a timing/race window, making success non-deterministic. There is no network vector and no user-interaction requirement (UI:N); the key limiting factors are the need for an existing local account and the probabilistic nature of heap corruption, not any non-default configuration.

Impact

This is a moderate-priority local privilege escalation rather than a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.0) tells a consistent story: the attacker must already be running code as an authenticated low-privileged local user (PR:L, AV:L), and exploitation is gated by high attack complexity (AC:H), which for a heap-based overflow (CWE-122) typically implies non-deterministic conditions such as heap grooming or a race window that cannot be reliably won every attempt. The payoff if successful is full compromise of the host (C:H/I:H/A:H), consistent with driver-level/kernel code execution and privilege elevation. No exploitation-probability or active-exploitation signals are present in the supplied data: there is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no POC reference, so by the precision rules this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No SSVC decision data was provided either. The signals are internally consistent (no contradictions between vector and description - both agree this is local and requires some privilege), so the main caveat is simply that real-world exploitability is dampened by AC:H and the need for an existing foothold. Net: patch in normal cycle prioritized by exposure to untrusted local users, but this is not a drop-everything network-exploitable flaw.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged foothold on a Windows host (for example via a phished user account or a compromised service) invokes the vulnerable VHD Miniport Driver through crafted I/O to trigger the heap overflow, corrupting kernel/driver heap structures to execute code at SYSTEM. Because attack complexity is High, the attacker likely must perform heap grooming or win a race condition, so exploitation may require multiple attempts. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows Virtual Hard Disk (VHD) Miniport Driver lets an attacker who already holds a low-privileged local account corrupt kernel heap memory and potentially elevate to SYSTEM. The defect is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) reachable by submitting I/O to the VHD storage stack, and with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.0 and High attack complexity (AC:H), reliable exploitation usually depends on heap-layout grooming or winning a timing window rather than a single deterministic request. Microsoft is the reporting vendor and no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis; this is best treated as a moderate-priority local privilege escalation, not an emergency remote threat.

RemediationAI

Because no exact fix version is enumerated in the supplied data, the primary action is to apply the Microsoft security update published for CVE-2026-103555 through the MSRC Update Guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-103555) - patch availability is per the vendor advisory, and the update is expected to be delivered via the normal Windows Update / Patch Tuesday servicing channel, so validate that affected hosts have the current cumulative update and rebooted to load the patched driver. While patching is pending, reduce the population of accounts that can reach the driver: mounting or attaching VHD files already generally requires administrative rights, so enforce strict least privilege and audit for non-administrative principals holding disk-management or volume-maintenance privileges, understanding the trade-off that tightening this can break legitimate virtualization, backup and forensic workflows that mount VHDs. Enable Virtualization-Based Security with HVCI and Microsoft Defender Exploit Protection for kernel pool hardening, accepting possible performance overhead or driver-compatibility issues on legacy third-party storage drivers. Additionally, monitor and alert on unusual or high-volume IOCTL traffic to the storage stack and on unexpected process creation of SYSTEM-level children, since these give detection coverage where the exploitation attempt is probabilistic and may fail before succeeding.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is the Windows VHD Miniport Driver (commonly vhdmp.sys), a kernel-mode storage driver that presents virtual hard disk images (.vhd/.vhdx) to the operating system as block devices so they can be mounted, attached and accessed like physical disks. Because the driver runs in kernel mode and processes attacker-influenceable structures supplied through mount/attach operations and device IOCTLs on the storage stack, a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in its parsing or buffer-management logic can overwrite adjacent pool allocations. The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the overflow is only reachable locally (AV:L) by an authenticated low-privileged user (PR:L), requires no user interaction (UI:N), and, if successfully triggered, yields high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact within the same security scope. The High complexity rating reflects the practical difficulty of turning non-deterministic heap corruption into controlled kernel execution, typically requiring heap grooming or race-window timing, which materially lowers the real-world success rate compared with a straightforward logic flaw.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local-only driver flaw (AV:L) needing an existing low-priv account (PR:L); heap grooming/race makes it AC:H; successful kernel code execution yields full C:H/I:H/A:H.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:17 nvd
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Virtual Hard Disk (VHD) Miniport Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A privilege-escalation flaw in the Windows Virtual Hard Disk (VHD) Miniport Driver could allow an attacker with an existing low-privileged local account to gain SYSTEM-level control on affected Windows systems, potentially exposing sensitive data, credentials, and security controls. Leadership should care because successful exploitation could enable broader lateral movement or tampering with security tooling, although current risk is constrained by the need for local access, high attack complexity, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, so risk reduction depends on interim controls and rapid patching when Microsoft provides a fix.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; enforce least privilege and remove unnecessary local accounts, restrict VHD file mounting and I/O to trusted administrators, enable attack surface reduction and exploit protection rules, monitor for suspicious VHD driver activity or kernel crashes, and apply Microsoft mitigations when published.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
VHD miniport driver ships as a core Windows storage component
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy