Skip to main content

Windows Storage EUVDEUVD-2026-100345

| CVE-2026-102189 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-xv23-cg3x-75r7
7.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local access
  2. Delivery
    Invoke crafted Windows Storage operation
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap-based buffer overflow
  4. Execution
    Corrupt heap and hijack execution
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess valid low-privilege authenticated local access to the target Windows host (PR:L), and to execute code or operations locally against the Windows Storage subsystem - there is no network or remote path (AV:L) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). The key limiting factor is high attack complexity (AC:H): successful exploitation depends on conditions outside the attacker's direct control, most likely a race condition or a precisely groomed heap state, meaning the attack is not reliably repeatable and may require numerous attempts. The provided data does not specify which Windows versions, editions, or storage configurations are affected; consult the MSRC advisory for the exact vulnerable builds.

Impact

This is a moderate-priority local privilege escalation flaw, not a remote emergency. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.0 (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) tells a nuanced story: although all three impact metrics are High, the real-world difficulty is constrained by a local attack vector (AV:L), high attack complexity (AC:H), and a requirement for pre-existing low-level privileges (PR:L). High attack complexity typically reflects a race condition or specific heap-state manipulation that is not reliably reproducible, which materially lowers the practical exploitation likelihood. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC indicator was provided in the input, so there is no signal of active or probable exploitation - this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis,' which should not be conflated with low risk but does argue against crisis-level prioritization. SSVC framing would likely place this at exploitation=none, automatable=no (local, authenticated, high-complexity flaws are not amenable to automated mass exploitation), with technical impact=total. In short, this reads as a legitimate but not urgent patch-cycle item: dangerous as a post-compromise escalation primitive for an attacker who already has a foothold, but unlikely to be a mass-exploited internet-facing threat. Note: EPSS/KEV/POC data were entirely absent from the input rather than confirmed negative - verify current CISA KEV and EPSS status before finalizing prioritization.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained an unprivileged-but-authenticated foothold on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing or a low-privilege service account) triggers a crafted operation against the Windows Storage subsystem to corrupt heap memory and overwrite control data, escalating to SYSTEM. Because the CVSS vector specifies high attack complexity (AC:H), the exploit likely depends on winning a race or achieving a precise heap layout, so success may require multiple attempts. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Storage subsystem (CWE-122) allows an authenticated local attacker holding low privileges to elevate to a higher-privileged context on the affected host. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N) and the assessment confirm the attacker must already be able to execute code locally and that exploitation is gated by high complexity, most likely a race condition or a carefully groomed heap layout, making success unreliable rather than repeatable. This is a moderate-priority local privilege-escalation issue rather than a remote emergency; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and there is no indication of confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV). The supplied data does not enumerate affected Windows builds, so the MSRC update guide must be consulted for the precise vulnerable and fixed versions.

RemediationAI

No explicit fix version is supplied in this dataset, so the primary remediation path is to obtain the patched build from Microsoft's update guide for CVE-2026-102189 at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-102189 and apply the applicable Windows security or cumulative update as soon as it is validated for the environment; treat that advisory as the authoritative record of fixed KB numbers and affected builds rather than assuming any specific patch level. Because exploitation requires the attacker to already execute code locally as a low-privileged user, there is no network-boundary workaround that removes the exposure; the practical compensating controls are to shrink the attacker footprint on the endpoint. Enforce least privilege and strip unnecessary local interactive or administrative rights so fewer accounts can reach the storage interface, accepting the trade-off that some legitimate user workflows will need to be re-provisioned. Deploy WDAC, AppLocker or equivalent application control to block unsigned and unapproved binaries from executing locally, understanding that this can break line-of-business tooling and requires ongoing rule maintenance. Restrict which operators can map or attach volumes and invoke storage-management APIs, so only trusted users can create the heap conditions the bug requires, at the cost of slowing legitimate disk-management tasks. Finally, monitor for local privilege-escalation behaviour and unexpected SYSTEM-level process creation or token elevation originating from storage-related components, and re-check the MSRC advisory periodically for any vendor mitigations or revised affected-build lists.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650

Affected Packages

euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 8 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-122, a heap-based buffer overflow, occurring in the Microsoft Windows Storage subsystem that handles storage drivers, volume and disk management, and the associated user-mode and kernel-mode interfaces exposed to local callers. Successful corruption of heap metadata or adjacent objects inside a privileged storage context is what yields the elevation of privilege, with high impact to confidentiality, integrity and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H) and scope unchanged, meaning the compromise is contained to the security authority of the target host rather than crossing a virtualization boundary. The vector AV:L/PR:L/UI:N describes a purely local attack that requires an existing low-privileged logon and no user interaction, while AC:H signals that the attacker must satisfy conditions outside direct control, consistent with a race window or precise heap grooming requirement that makes the exploit non-deterministic. No CPE identifiers were supplied with this record, so exact component, architecture or build enumeration cannot be derived from the dataset; the authoritative enumeration lives in the Microsoft advisory linked in the references.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local privilege escalation requiring a pre-existing low-privilege foothold (PR:L), with AC:H reflecting the heap-grooming or race condition typical of such overflows; full C/I/A impact upon success.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:17 nvd
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Storage allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Windows Storage subsystem vulnerability (CVE-2026-102189) allows authenticated local attackers with low privileges to elevate to higher-privileged contexts on affected hosts. Exploitation requires local access and high complexity, making it unreliable, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, so organizations should apply interim hardening and monitoring to mitigate risk.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce least privilege, restrict local interactive logon to trusted users, implement application whitelisting, enable EDR monitoring for privilege-escalation attempts, and disable unnecessary storage services. Apply vendor patch when available.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows Storage is a core component of the Windows operating system
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy