Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Deliver crafted file or link to user
  2. Delivery
    User opens malicious content
  3. Exploit
    Bypass Windows Shell security feature
  4. Execution
    Inject and execute commands
  5. Impact
    Full host compromise (C/I/A)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Command injection prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires victim user interaction (CVSS UI:R): the target must open or interact with attacker-supplied content (e.g., a crafted file, shortcut, or link) that triggers the Windows Shell security-feature bypass and subsequent command injection. No authentication or prior privileges are needed (PR:N) and the vector is network-reachable (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L), so no special target configuration is indicated - default Windows Shell behavior is affected. The primary limiting factor is the need for user interaction, which is why SSVC rates the flaw as not automatable; there is no evidence of a non-default configuration requirement.

Impact

This is a genuine top-tier priority, not a high-CVSS-but-low-risk case. Multiple independent signals converge: CISA KEV confirms active exploitation in the wild, SSVC rates exploitation as 'active' with 'total' technical impact, a patch is available, and the CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 8.8) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise. The only meaningful brake is UI:R - successful exploitation requires a victim to take an action (e.g., open a crafted file or follow a link) - which is consistent with SSVC marking Automatable='no', so exploitation is user-interaction-gated rather than wormable/mass-automatable. Note a semantic tension worth flagging: the description frames the issue as allowing an attacker to 'bypass a security feature,' yet the CWE is CWE-77 (command injection) and the impact metrics are a full C:H/I:H/A:H triad; the security-feature-bypass framing likely describes the mechanism (evading a Shell protection) that then enables code/command execution - verify exact exploitation primitive against Microsoft's MSRC advisory. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be compared here; however, KEV status makes EPSS moot for prioritization. Treat as emergency-patch class given confirmed active exploitation across virtually all supported Windows releases.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker delivers a crafted file, shortcut, or link to a target and, leveraging a Windows Shell security-feature bypass, causes command injection (CWE-77) when the victim opens or interacts with it. Because this is confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) with low attack complexity and no prior privileges, a single user click can yield full compromise of the host. No standalone public POC is identified in the provided data, but in-the-wild exploitation is confirmed.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: In CISA KEV with patch available.
Exploited in the wild (CISA KEV) Patch available 1.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then execute arbitrary commands, yielding high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The attack is network-reachable with low complexity but requires victim interaction (CVSS UI:R) - the target must open or interact with attacker-supplied content such as a crafted file, shortcut, or link - which is why SSVC rates it non-automatable while still flagging total technical impact. The flaw affects Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 R2 through 2025, plus Outlook.com, and is confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV); given the KEV listing and the assessed high-end impact, this is a genuine top-tier patching priority rather than a high-CVSS-but-low-risk case.

RemediationAI

Patch status is Patch available per vendor advisory; Microsoft (secure@microsoft.com) has published remediation at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-96951, and the EUVD version ranges indicate the fixed build thresholds to update to - for example 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2016, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, 6.3.9600.23470 for Windows Server 2012 R2, 10.0.26100.33650/10.0.26100.9711 for Windows Server 2025 and Windows 11 24H2, and 10.0.22631.7652, 10.0.26200.9711, 10.0.28000.3231 and 10.0.26300.9711 for the corresponding Windows 11 releases. Because this CVE is confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) and SSVC records active exploitation with total technical impact, treat it as emergency maintenance: apply the cumulative updates to all listed client, server, and Server Core builds, and ensure the Outlook.com service-side fix (build 20260925.100 or later) is deployed. Where immediate patching of every endpoint is not feasible, the exploit chain depends on a user opening attacker-supplied content, so compensating controls are to enforce Mark-of-the-Web and SmartScreen evaluation on all inbound files and email attachments, use mail/web gateways to strip or quarantine untrusted shortcut (.lnk), script, and archive/container formats, disable or restrict Windows Shell preview and handler functionality for untrusted file types, and enable Microsoft Defender Attack Surface Reduction rules that block shell-created child processes and Office/app execution of downloaded payloads. Trade-offs to weigh: blocking .lnk and archive attachments disrupts legitimate internal file-sharing workflows and will generate user complaints, and aggressive ASR/script-blocking rules can break line-of-business macros and installer scripts, so stage them in audit mode first; none of these workarounds remove the underlying command-injection path, and they become unnecessary once the vendor updates above are installed.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Outlook.com 1.0.0 <20260925.100
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376

Affected Packages

euvd outlook_com fix: 20260925.100
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 19 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-77, improper neutralization of special elements used in a command, i.e., classic command injection. The Windows Shell constructs and hands command strings to an interpreter without adequately escaping or validating attacker-influenced data, so crafted content processed by the shell is interpreted as command syntax rather than inert data. Because the vulnerable path sits in the Shell itself, the injection also lets an attacker bypass a Windows security feature (the same parsing/trust path that is supposed to enforce that protection), turning a single user click into arbitrary code execution in the user's context. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the network-reachable, unauthenticated, low-complexity nature of the flaw, with the sole practical barrier being the user-interaction requirement; the scope remains unchanged, so the impact is contained to the vulnerable Shell component rather than escalating across security boundaries. Affected builds span the Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server code bases (10.0.14393.x, 10.0.17763.x, 10.0.19044/19045.x, 10.0.20348.x, 10.0.22631.x, 10.0.26100.x, 10.0.26200.x, 10.0.26300.x, 10.0.28000.x, and the legacy 6.3.9600.x branch), which is consistent with a long-lived Shell parsing component shared across releases.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
ENISA EUVD HIGH
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-delivered, low-complexity, unauthenticated command injection requiring a victim click (UI:R), yielding full host compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H) within an unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
Added to CISA KEV
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:49 CISA
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:22 cve.org
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Windows Shell allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

Technical POC Analysis

Evidence caveat up front: the only primary source supplied is the CISA KEV entry (GCVE UUID ddbf6640-16e5-4ba6-87f2-6ad3daf81d63) plus the summary supplied with this task.

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity command-injection vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Shell (CVE-2026-96951) is confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV) and affects Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows Server 2012 R2 through 2025, and Outlook.com. Although exploitation requires a user to open or interact with attacker-supplied content, it can bypass a Windows security feature and allow arbitrary command execution with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. This creates enterprise-wide risk of endpoint compromise, lateral movement, and data loss across both workstation/server estates and Outlook.com users, making immediate patching a top leadership priority.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Model

5 threats: Elevation of Privilege, Tampering, Information Disclosure and 2 more

5-step attack chain with trust boundaries and controls

Full threat model - attack chain, trust boundaries, controls per stage and evidence - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Threat Score
4.8/10
Composite threat intelligence
EPSS Score
1.5%
Top 26% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows Shell ships in every supported Windows client and server release
Threat Intel
2
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:Yes
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Detected
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
9 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV Yes
Public POC Yes
EPSS 1.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
In CISA KEV with patch available
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
Active
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

121
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: +50
EPSS: +2
CVSS: +44
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: +5

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy