Skip to main content

Tcpdu EUVDEUVD-2025-208690

| CVE-2025-15587 HIGH
Direct Request ('Forced Browsing') (CWE-425)
2026-03-16 CERT-PL
8.6
CVSS 4.0 · NVD
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Direct request prevention
Impact

Despite the high CVSS 4.0 score of 8.6, the real-world risk requires nuanced assessment. The attack vector is Adjacent Network (AV:A), limiting exploitation to attackers on the same network segment, and requires low privileges (PR:L) with no user interaction. The high impact ratings (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) reflect the severity of exposing administrator credentials. However, the absence from CISA KEV indicates no known active exploitation, and no public POC exists. The SSVC framework would likely rate this as 'Attend' rather than 'Act' priority due to limited exploitation evidence and network-adjacent requirements. Organizations should prioritize patching based on network exposure and criticality of managed infrastructure rather than CVSS score alone.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with valid low-privilege credentials on the same network segment as the Tinycontrol device could bypass the web interface restrictions by directly crafting HTTP requests to hidden administrative endpoints. By accessing these unprotected resources, they could retrieve the administrator password in plaintext or easily reversible format, then use these credentials to gain full control over the power distribution unit or LAN controller, potentially disrupting critical infrastructure operations.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Mar 16, 2026

A privilege escalation vulnerability in Tinycontrol network management devices (tcPDU and LAN Controllers) allows low-privileged users to retrieve administrator passwords by directly accessing resources that are hidden from the graphical interface. The vulnerability affects multiple product lines including tcPDU, LK3.5, LK3.9, and LK4 controllers across various hardware versions, with a high CVSS score of 8.6 indicating significant risk. No evidence of active exploitation exists (not in KEV), no public POC is available, and the EPSS score is not provided, but patches are available for all affected versions.

RemediationAI

Upgrade affected Tinycontrol devices to the patched firmware versions: tcPDU to version 1.36 or later, LK3.5 series to version 1.67 or later, LK3.9 to version 1.75 or later, and LK4 to version 1.38 or later. Until patching is complete, implement network segmentation to restrict access to management interfaces to trusted administrative networks only, enforce strong authentication for all users, and monitor access logs for suspicious direct resource access attempts. Consider placing these devices behind a secure management VLAN with strict firewall rules limiting access to authorized administrators only.

Affected VersionsENISA

LK3.9 0 <1.75
LK4 0 <1.38
tcPDU 0 <1.36
Lan Kontroler v3.5 0 <1.67

Affected Packages

euvd lan_kontroler_v3_5 fix: 1.67
euvd lk3_9 fix: 1.75
euvd lk4 fix: 1.38
euvd tcpdu fix: 1.36

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 4 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability affects Tinycontrol's network-connected power distribution units (tcPDU) and LAN Controllers (LK series), which are industrial control devices used for remote power and equipment management. The root cause is CWE-425 (Direct Request or 'Forced Browsing'), a security misconfiguration where sensitive resources lack proper access controls when accessed directly via URLs or API endpoints, even though they appear protected in the user interface. This allows authenticated users with low privileges to bypass intended access restrictions by crafting direct requests to administrative resources that store or expose password data.

Know when Tcpdu gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 8.6 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Analysis Updated
Apr 16, 2026 - 06:22 EUVD-patch-fix
executive summary
Patch available
Apr 16, 2026 - 05:29 EUVD
1.75,1.38,1.36
CVE Published
Mar 16, 2026 - 09:26 nvd
HIGH 8.6

DescriptionCVE.org

Tinycontrol devices such as tcPDU and LAN Controllers LK3.5, LK3.9 and LK4 allow a low privileged user to read an administrator's password by directly accessing a specific resource inaccessible via a graphical interface.

This issue has been fixed in firmware versions: 1.36 (for tcPDU), 1.67 (for LK3.5 - hardware versions: 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 and 3.8), 1.75 (for LK3.9 - hardware version 3.9) and 1.38 (for LK4 - hardware version 4.0).

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2025-15587 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in Tinycontrol network management devices (tcPDU and LAN Controllers) that enables low-privileged users to extract administrator credentials, potentially compromising administrative access to critical network infrastructure. Organizations running affected tcPDU, LK3.5, LK3.9, or LK4 controllers should prioritize remediation, as successful exploitation could grant attackers full administrative control over network management and connected devices.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement network segmentation to restrict low-privileged user access to affected devices, enforce strong access controls limiting local login capabilities, and monitor administrative account activity for unauthorized access attempts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 95% exploitable
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

43
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +43
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Related Vulnerabilities in Tinycontrol Authentication Bypass

View all 2

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy