Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privileged Webform user
-
DeliveryInject crafted script into Webform input
-
ExploitPayload stored/reflected in generated page
-
ExecutionVictim loads affected page
-
ImpactScript executes in victim browser context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Output encoding, context-aware escaping
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated account with at least low-level privileges (PR:L) sufficient to supply input that Webform renders into a generated page, plus victim user interaction (UI:R) - a user must load the page where the unneutralized input is displayed for the script to execute. These two factors (required authentication and required victim interaction) are the principal limiters on real-world exploitability and keep impact scoped to the victim's own session (S:U, C:L/I:L/A:N). The description does not name the specific Webform feature, configuration mode, or field that carries the untrusted input, so the exact trigger is not described in the available sources. Affected deployments are Drupal sites running Webform before 6.2.12, or 6.3.0 before 6.3.1. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity stored/reflected Cross-Site Scripting flaw (CVSS 3.1 base 4.6) in the Drupal Webform contributed module. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N indicates network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation that nonetheless requires some level of privilege (PR:L) and victim user interaction (UI:R), with only limited confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact. The multi-source signals are mutually consistent and point to a genuinely low real-world risk rather than an emergency: EPSS is 0.20% (10th percentile), there is no CISA KEV listing (i.e., no confirmed active exploitation), and no public exploit code is identified in the provided data - the only vuldb entry is an advisory, not a working exploit. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month', which aligns with a 'patch on the normal cycle' posture rather than act-now urgency. No key signals conflict here; the main caveat is that the description does not specify whether the XSS is stored or reflected, nor which Webform feature or field carries the untrusted input, so the precise trigger cannot be confirmed from the available sources. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a low-privileged authenticated account that can submit or configure content handled by Webform injects a malicious script payload into an input that is later rendered without proper neutralization. When an administrator or another user views the affected page, the script executes in their browser session, enabling limited session/data theft or UI manipulation within the victim's privileges. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; the specific vulnerable field is not described in the available sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 22, 2026
Cross-site scripting in the Drupal Webform contributed module lets an authenticated low-privilege user supply input that Webform renders into a generated page without neutralization, so the payload executes in the browser of any user who later loads that page, scoped to the victim's own session (CVSS 3.1 base 4.6, S:U, C:L/I:L/A:N). Drupal sites running Webform before 6.2.12, or 6.3.0 before 6.3.1, are affected; exploitation requires a low-privileged account (PR:L) plus victim interaction (UI:R), which are the principal limiters on real-world exploitability. EPSS is 0.20% (10th percentile), no public exploit identified at time of analysis, no CISA KEV entry, and a vendor patch is available, so the vuln.today decision label is this_month.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: update the Drupal Webform module to 6.2.12 for the 6.x branch and to 6.3.1 for the 6.3.x branch, then run the Drupal database update routine and confirm the module version reported on the site's extend page. Patch availability is confirmed ('Patch: Available from vendor'), and the authoritative instructions are the Drupal security advisory https://www.drupal.org/sa-contrib-2026-158, with corroborating records at https://vuldb.com/vuln/425139 and https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-96358. Sites that cannot update immediately should note that the supplied sources do not document a specific workaround or configuration-based mitigation for this issue; the practical interim measure is to limit which roles hold the low-level privileges required to submit the affected input, accepting that this reduces form usage for those roles and does not remove the flaw. No vendor guidance beyond updating is present in the available references, and EPSS (0.20%, 10th percentile) plus the absence of KEV listing suggest lower near-term exploitation pressure, consistent with the this_month decision label.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in composer, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-79, improper neutralization of input during web page generation: untrusted content handled by the Webform module (a widely deployed Drupal contributed module for building forms and rendering submissions) reaches a generated page without adequate encoding or sanitization, so script supplied as input is interpreted by the browser rather than displayed as text. The affected package is identified as cpe:2.3:a:drupal:webform, a Drupal contributed module rather than Drupal core, meaning exposure depends on whether a site has installed and enabled the module. The assessed CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N describes severity, not mechanism: the network attack vector and low attack complexity are paired with a required low-privileged authenticated account and required victim interaction, and the unchanged scope with low confidentiality and integrity impact reflects that consequences stay within the victim's session. The available sources do not name the specific Webform feature, configuration mode, or field that carries the untrusted input, so the exact trigger is not described in the available sources.
Know when Webform gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
XSS reachable over the network with low complexity, but injection requires a privileged account (PR:L) and script execution needs a victim to view the page (UI:R); impact limited to C:L/I:L.
Primary rating from Vendor (drupal).
CVSS VectorVendor: drupal
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Webform allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects Webform versions: from 0.0.0 to 6.2.12, from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Cross-Site Scripting occurs when an application accepts untrusted data and sends it to a web browser without proper validation or encoding.
EUVD-2026-107843
GHSA-94gh-7cf2-wjgx
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB