Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach RPC Endpoint Mapper on TCP 135
  2. Exploit
    Send sustained crafted RPC requests
  3. Execution
    Exhaust service resources (CWE-770)
  4. Impact
    Denial of service on Windows host

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource allocation limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The RPC Endpoint Mapper service (TCP port 135) must be network-reachable from the attacker; no authentication (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N) is required. However, AC:H means exploitation is NOT a single-shot trigger against default settings - it requires conditions outside the attacker's full control, consistent with resource exhaustion that needs sustained or precisely-timed request volume to deplete service resources. Limiting factors: impact is availability-only (service outage, no data or integrity loss); port 135 is typically firewalled from the internet and exposed mainly on internal/enterprise networks, so realistic exposure is usually internal attackers or compromised internal hosts rather than the open internet.

Impact

This is a medium-severity availability-only flaw (CVSS 5.9) whose real-world priority is modest, and multiple independent signals agree on that. The CVSS vector (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) confirms a network-reachable, unauthenticated trigger, but AC:H indicates the attacker does not fully control the conditions needed to succeed - typical of resource-exhaustion bugs (CWE-770) that require sustained or specifically-timed request patterns rather than a single packet. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces low urgency: Exploitation=none (no observed activity), Automatable=no, and Technical Impact=partial. No KEV listing and no public POC were provided, so exploitation status is speculative-at-best. EPSS is NOT present in the input and cannot be assessed - this is a gap, not a low score. Impact is strictly availability (C:N/I:N/A:H, Scope:Unchanged): no data disclosure, no code execution, no lateral movement. Net assessment: a patch-in-normal-cycle issue, not an emergency. The main thing that would elevate it is exposure of RPC Endpoint Mapper (TCP 135) directly to the internet, which is poor practice and uncommon in hardened environments.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote, unauthenticated attacker with network reachability to TCP port 135 sends a stream of crafted RPC Endpoint Mapper requests designed to consume server resources, eventually rendering the RPC locator/mapper service unresponsive and disrupting dependent services on the target Windows host. The AC:H rating implies this requires sustained or carefully-timed traffic rather than a single request, so it is a degradation/outage condition rather than instant takedown. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Uncontrolled resource consumption in the Windows RPC Endpoint Mapper service (listening on TCP 135) allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to deny service over a network by exhausting service resources. Rated CVSS 5.9 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), the impact is availability-only and the High attack complexity means an outage is not achievable with a single trigger against default configurations, but requires sustained or precisely timed request volume. The affected surface spans Windows Server 2012 through Server 2025 (including Server Core) plus Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2 and Windows 11 23H2 through 26H2; no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation have been identified at time of analysis, and Microsoft has published a vendor update guide.

RemediationAI

Patch status per vendor: Patch available per vendor advisory - Microsoft has released updates for this issue through the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-96300, and the affected-range data indicates the fix is delivered by moving each platform to a build at or above the listed thresholds (for example 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, and 6.2.9200.26434 / 6.3.9600.23470 for the legacy Server 2012 and 2012 R2 branches); apply the corresponding cumulative or security-only update rather than assuming a version number. Because no public exploit code has been identified and CISA SSVC rates exploitation as none with automatability as no, this should be scheduled as routine monthly patching rather than emergency change, prioritising internet- or partner-exposed hosts and domain controllers. As a compensating control where patching must be deferred, restrict inbound TCP 135 with host and perimeter firewalls so only trusted management subnets and RPC-dependent systems can reach the Endpoint Mapper - note this will break RPC/DCOM, WMI, DFS, Exchange, and remote administration traffic that legitimately uses dynamic endpoints unless you also scope the necessary high-port ranges, so validate against a staging environment first. Disabling or unregistering the Endpoint Mapper is not a viable mitigation on Windows because it is an OS-integral service, and blocking port 135 broadly on servers introduces significant operational fallout; segmenting the network and monitoring for abnormal connection volume to TCP 135 are lower-impact alternatives that reduce the sustained request volume needed to trigger exhaustion.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The RPC Endpoint Mapper (epmapper) is the Windows RPC service bound to TCP port 135 that clients query to resolve which dynamic endpoint a given RPC interface UUID is listening on; it is a foundational component for DCOM, WMI, domain operations, DFS, and many enterprise management tools. The root cause class is CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling), meaning the service accepts client-driven work or internal allocations without enforcing adequate caps or backpressure, so repeated or synchronized lookups can starve the process of resources until it stops responding. The CVSS vector (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N but AC:H) confirms reachability from the network without credentials or user interaction while also indicating that exploitation depends on conditions outside the attacker's full control, consistent with a resource-exhaustion pattern rather than a deterministic single-packet crash. The service's impact is limited to availability (C:N/I:N/A:H) and CISA's SSVC decision data classifies technical impact as partial and automatability as no, so the practical risk concentrates on hosts where port 135 is reachable.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 5.9 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

Network-reachable and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N); AC:H because resource exhaustion needs sustained/timed conditions; availability-only impact (A:H, C:N/I:N) with no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.9

DescriptionCVE.org

Uncontrolled resource consumption in RPC Endpoint Mapper Service allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 43% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
RPC Endpoint Mapper is a core service on all Windows versions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

31
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy