Skip to main content

RHACS Central CVE-2026-9165

| EUVDEUVD-2026-41859 HIGH
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400)
2026-07-06 redhat GHSA-fw53-q2vg-jr6g
7.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: redhat
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain valid RHACS API token
  2. Delivery
    Reach Central GraphQL endpoint
  3. Exploit
    Submit deeply nested query
  4. Execution
    Resolver tree exhausts CPU/memory
  5. Persist
    Central becomes unresponsive
  6. Impact
    Management plane denial of service

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated session against Central's GraphQL API - specifically a valid RHACS API token (PR:L) - and network reachability to the Central endpoint (AV:N). The exact trigger is a deeply nested GraphQL query sent to the authenticated GraphQL API, exploiting the absence of any query-depth limit; no user interaction and no non-default configuration are needed since the missing depth cap is the default behavior. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the attacker must already possess a legitimate API token, so exposure is bounded by how many tokens exist and how well they are guarded, and by whether the Central API is reachable only from trusted management networks rather than broadly exposed.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H (7.7, High) is internally consistent with the description: network-reachable API, low complexity, low privileges (a valid API token), no user interaction, and a pure availability impact with no confidentiality or integrity loss. Red Hat scored Scope as Changed (S:C), presumably because a downed Central degrades security monitoring across all managed clusters; a more conservative reading treats the resource exhaustion as confined to Central itself (S:U), which would lower the score - this is the main point of divergence and should be verified against Red Hat's advisory. No EPSS score, KEV entry, or POC was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the input; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Net: this is a credible operational-availability risk for RHACS operators rather than a critical breach vector, and its real priority hinges on how exposed the Central GraphQL endpoint is and how tightly API tokens are controlled.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An insider or a user whose RHACS API token has leaked authenticates to Central's GraphQL API and submits a single deeply nested query. Central attempts to resolve the exponentially expanding query tree, spiking CPU and memory until it becomes unresponsive, cutting off security policy enforcement and monitoring for every cluster Central manages. The low attack complexity means the query can be crafted and replayed with no special tooling; no public POC is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 06, 2026

Authenticated denial of service in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (RHACS) 4 allows any user holding a valid API token to exhaust Central's resources. Because Central does not cap the nesting depth of queries served on its authenticated GraphQL API, a single deeply nested query can drive excessive CPU and memory consumption and take down the RHACS management plane. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV, but the low-privilege network vector makes it trivial for any token holder to trigger.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is specified in the available data, so consult the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-9165 for the fixed RHACS 4.x release and upgrade Central to it once published. As compensating controls until patched, tightly restrict who holds valid Central API tokens and rotate or revoke unused tokens to shrink the pool of potential abusers, and place the Central GraphQL/API endpoint behind network policy or an ingress/API gateway that limits exposure to trusted management networks only (trade-off: may disrupt legitimate automation clients that reach Central directly). Where an upstream proxy supports it, apply request rate limiting and body/complexity limits to the GraphQL endpoint to blunt abusive nested queries, accepting that a proxy cannot enforce true GraphQL depth limits and may throttle legitimate large queries. Track the Bugzilla record at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2480505 for the fixed-version announcement.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

RHACS Central is the centralized management and policy engine of Red Hat's Kubernetes-native security platform, exposing a GraphQL API for its web UI and automation clients. GraphQL lets clients compose arbitrarily nested queries, and without a server-enforced maximum query depth (or complexity/cost limit) a small request can expand into an enormous resolver tree. This maps to CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption): the root cause is the absence of a depth/complexity guard on the query parser and resolver pipeline, so attacker-controlled query structure directly governs server-side work. The affected component per CPE is cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_advanced_cluster_security_4, i.e. the RHACS 4.x product line.

Know when Kubernetes gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 7.7 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network-reachable GraphQL API with low complexity and a required API token gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:L; availability-only impact confined to Central yields A:H and S:U (I judge scope unchanged, unlike vendor S:C).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Red Hat 7.7 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw was found in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (RHACS). Central does not limit the depth of GraphQL queries served on the authenticated GraphQL API. An authenticated user with a valid API token can send deeply nested queries that cause excessive resource consumption in Central, resulting in a denial of service for the management plane.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (RHACS) 4 can be disabled by any user holding API credentials, preventing security teams from monitoring container deployments and enforcing access controls across Kubernetes clusters. Organizations running RHACS must immediately restrict API token distribution and implement safeguards to prevent malicious queries from disabling the security management platform.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce strict API token lifecycle management and limit token holders to essential service accounts; implement GraphQL query depth and timeout restrictions at the API gateway or WAF layer; segment RHACS Central from untrusted networks and restrict API access by IP allowlist; establish continuous monitoring for abnormal query submissions; maintain automated backup and recovery procedures for rapid Central restoration following a DoS event.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 83% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise Kubernetes security add-on, common in Red Hat/OpenShift shops
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor CIRCL VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_advanced_cluster_security_4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2025-1974 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 25

A critical vulnerability in Kubernetes ingress-nginx controller allows unauthenticated attackers with pod network access

CVE-2026-45321 CRITICAL POC
9.6 May 12

Credential-harvesting malware compromised 84 versions of 42 TanStack npm packages on 2026-05-11 via chained GitHub Actio

CVE-2025-1098 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

Kubernetes ingress-nginx contains a configuration injection vulnerability via the mirror-target and mirror-host Ingress

CVE-2025-24514 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-url` Ingres

CVE-2025-1097 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-tls-match-c

CVE-2020-8554 MEDIUM POC
6.3 Jan 21

Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.exter

CVE-2023-3676 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 31

A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a user that can create pods on Windows nodes may be able to escalate

CVE-2025-55190 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Sep 04

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.9), this vulne

CVE-2026-34976 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Apr 02

Unauthenticated remote attackers can trigger complete database overwrites, server-side file reads, and SSRF attacks agai

CVE-2018-18843 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 04

The Kubernetes integration in GitLab Enterprise Edition 11.x before 11.2.8, 11.3.x before 11.3.9, and 11.4.x before 11.4

CVE-2026-54680 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jul 29

Fluentd configuration injection in the kube-logging Logging operator before 6.6.0 allows a namespace-scoped user who can

CVE-2025-64709 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Nov 13

Authenticated Typebot users can abuse the webhook block (HTTP Request component) in versions prior to 3.13.1 to issue ar

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy