Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach exposed RDS service
-
ExploitSend crafted path-traversal request
-
ExecutionRead files outside intended scope
-
ImpactExfiltrate sensitive config and credentials
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that ColdFusion's RDS (Remote Development Services) feature be ENABLED. RDS is a development/debugging-only service and is automatically DISABLED when the server runs under Production Secure Profile; the ColdFusion Lockdown Guide also directs operators to disable RDS manually when Secure Profile is not used. Therefore the primary limiting factor is deployment mode: default-hardened production servers (Secure Profile on, RDS off) are not exposed, while dev, staging, or legacy servers with RDS left on are vulnerable. Per the CVSS vector (PR:N/UI:N) no authentication or user interaction is needed once RDS is reachable; the practical gate is RDS reachability and the non-default enabled state, not credentials. |
| Impact | Adobe rates this 9.3 Critical via CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H, but several signals temper real-world urgency. First, a notable conflict: the vector declares I:H and A:H (full integrity and availability impact), yet the description limits the flaw to 'arbitrary file system read' only - a read primitive does not normally justify I:H/A:H, so the vendor impact metrics appear inflated relative to the described behavior; treat confidentiality as the genuine impact. Second, the vector lists AV:L (local) while RDS (Remote Development Services) is inherently a network-reachable service consumed by remote development tooling, so AV:L likely understates reachability - verify with Adobe whether 'local' reflects a loopback-only default. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public proof-of-concept were provided, so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' rather than active exploitation. The strongest risk mitigant is operational: RDS is a development/debugging feature that is automatically disabled under ColdFusion's Production Secure Profile and is explicitly recommended for disablement by the Lockdown Guide, so correctly hardened production servers are not exposed. Net: a high-severity read vulnerability whose practical risk is gated almost entirely on whether RDS is left enabled - a real priority for dev/staging or unhardened servers, but low exposure in properly locked-down production. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who can reach a ColdFusion server with RDS enabled (i.e., not running Production Secure Profile) sends a crafted path-traversal request to the RDS endpoint to read files outside the intended web/application scope, such as ColdFusion configuration files containing datasource credentials, encryption seeds, or other secrets. Exploitation requires no user interaction and, per the PR:N vector, no authentication. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
A path traversal flaw in Adobe ColdFusion's Remote Development Services (RDS) component allows arbitrary file system read outside the intended directory scope, exposing configuration files, credential stores and source code on servers where RDS is reachable. Affected builds are ColdFusion 2023 up to and including 2023.0.25 and ColdFusion 2025 up to and including 2025.0.13; per the CVSS vector (PR:N/UI:N) no credentials or user interaction are required once RDS is accessible, so the practical gate is deployment mode rather than authentication. Adobe scores this 9.3 Critical (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H), but our reassessment scores it CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N because RDS is network-reachable on exposed servers while the integrity and availability components are not supported by the path-traversal-to-file-read primitive; no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and real-world exposure is limited to dev, staging or legacy servers that have left RDS enabled (Production Secure Profile disables it automatically).
RemediationAI
Primary action: apply the current ColdFusion update listed in Adobe security bulletin APSB26-144 (https://www.adobe.com/trust/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-144.html) for the applicable 2023.x or 2025.x track; the provided intelligence does not specify an exact patched build number, so confirm the fixed version in the advisory before upgrading, and note that instances above 2023.0.25 or 2025.0.13 in the affected ranges require remediation. Highest-value compensating control with the least functional cost on production systems: enable the Production Secure Profile, which automatically disables RDS - the coldfusion-2025 Lockdown Guide and the Adobe RDS hardening page document the exact steps, and the STIG finding V-279042 codifies it. Where Secure Profile cannot be enabled (shared dev/staging hosts, legacy apps), disable RDS manually via the ColdFusion Administrator, remove or block the CFIDE/RDS servlet mappings, and deny network access to RDS endpoints at the firewall or reverse proxy so only trusted developer subnets can reach them; the trade-off is that Dreamweaver/ColdFusion Builder RDS workflows, remote datasource browsing and RDS file deployment stop working and developers must fall back to file-based or version-control deployment. Do not expose the ColdFusion Administrator or CFIDE paths to untrusted networks as a workaround, since that only relocates the attack surface. Because exploitation requires only the RDS endpoint to be reachable (PR:N/UI:N) and yields high-confidentiality reads, treat any server with RDS enabled as potentially already compromised, rotate the ColdFusion service account, datasource and admin credentials, and review file-access logs for traversal patterns in requests to RDS/CFIDE endpoints. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, but the flaw is unauthenticated and trivially scriptable, so pre-patch exposure should be treated as high risk on internet-facing dev or staging servers.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-22, Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory, inside Adobe ColdFusion's Remote Development Services (RDS). RDS is a legacy development and debugging service that exposes server-side filesystem and datasource operations to IDE clients such as Dreamweaver and ColdFusion Builder, and it is served through the ColdFusion web tier (historically via CFIDE/RDS endpoints) rather than through a separate hardened daemon. Because the service resolves client-supplied paths without canonicalizing or confining them to a permitted base directory, traversal sequences such as ../ can escape the intended root and read arbitrary files on the host with the privileges of the ColdFusion service account. The CVSS scope change (S:C) is meaningful here: a successful read is not contained within the vulnerable component's own security authority, since the file contents retrieved (password.properties, neo-*.xml, datasource credentials, application source, key stores) can directly enable compromise of other components. Adobe's own documentation set embedded in the references makes the mitigating architecture explicit - RDS is described as a debugging-only feature, and switching ColdFusion to the Production Secure Profile disables RDS automatically, with the ColdFusion Lockdown Guide prescribing manual RDS disablement when Secure Profile is not used. CPE strings were not supplied in the input data; the authoritative affected version sets come from the EUVD record (ColdFusion 2023 0 through 2023.0.25 and ColdFusion 2025 0 through 2025.0.13). Note the vector disagreement between Adobe (AV:L) and our assessment (AV:N): an unauthenticated network-facing RDS endpoint is the exploitation reality, and AV:L likely reflects an assumption that only a local developer client would invoke RDS.
Know when Coldfusion gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
RDS is a network-reachable development service so AV:N not AV:L; the described primitive is read-only, so C:H with I:N/A:N, and reading host files beyond CF's scope justifies S:C.
Primary rating from Vendor (adobe).
CVSS VectorVendor: adobe
DescriptionCVE.org
ColdFusion RDS is affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive files and directories outside the intended access scope. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
RDS is purely a development feature meant for debugging purposes, and switching ColdFusion to Production Secure Profile automatically disables RDS. The Lockdown Guide outlines the specific step to disable RDS if a ColdFusion server is not being used in Production Secure Profile.
Executive ViewAI
Adobe ColdFusion instances that expose RDS face a critical unauthenticated file-disclosure issue, with no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, putting sensitive server-side data and connected application trust at risk. Security leadership should treat internet-reachable or broadly accessible RDS endpoints as an urgent containment priority because attackers could obtain secrets without credentials or user action, although no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The affected builds are ColdFusion 2023 up to and including 2023.0.25 and ColdFusion 2025 up to and including 2025.0.13.
Disable RDS if not required; otherwise restrict RDS to trusted management networks via firewall allowlists, VPN/zero-trust with MFA, and network segmentation, and monitor for anomalous file-read activity. No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.
More in Coldfusion
View allUnspecified vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 9.0, 9.0.1, 9.0.2, and 10 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files
Path traversal in Adobe ColdFusion 2025.9, 2023.20 and earlier enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to write or acc
The Office Open XML (OOXML) feature in Adobe ColdFusion 10 before Update 21 and 11 before Update 10 allows remote attack
Adobe ColdFusion versions July 12 release (2018.0.0.310739), Update 6 and earlier, and Update 14 and earlier have an unr
Adobe ColdFusion versions 2018 Update 15 (and earlier) and 2021 Update 5 (and earlier) are affected by an Improper Acces
ColdFusion versions 2023.12, 2021.18, 2025.0 and earlier are affected by a Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerabili
Adobe ColdFusion has an Untrusted Data Deserialization vulnerability. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerabi
Adobe ColdFusion has an Untrusted Data Deserialization vulnerability. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerabi
Arbitrary code execution in Adobe ColdFusion 2025.9, 2023.20 and all earlier releases lets a remote attacker upload a fi
Adobe ColdFusion versions 2023.5 (and earlier) and 2021.11 (and earlier) are affected by an Deserialization of Untrusted
ColdFusion versions 2023.12, 2021.18, 2025.0 and earlier are affected by a Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerabili
Unspecified vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 9.0 before Update 11, 9.0.1 before Update 10, 9.0.2 before Update 5, and 1
EUVD-2026-100518
GHSA-r8v2-jg8h-rg32
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB