Skip to main content

Azure Key Vault CVE-2026-88132

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99656 MEDIUM
Origin Validation Error (CWE-346)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-4h47-v37p-4458
5.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent/in-path network position
  2. Exploit
    Present spoofed or unauthorized Key Vault origin
  3. Execution
    SDK fails origin validation
  4. Impact
    Sensitive secrets disclosed to attacker

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Origin validation
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an application using the affected Azure Key Vault client SDK packages (azure-keyvault-administration, azure-keyvault-certificates, azure-keyvault-keys, azure-keyvault-secrets, and the Key Vault Client SDK) within the vulnerable version ranges, and the attacker must be able to supply or impersonate an unauthorized origin that the SDK fails to validate (CWE-346) - typically a network in-path/MITM or origin-spoofing position. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N), but the high attack complexity (AC:H) is the primary limiting factor: the attacker must control or influence the network response/origin, which is not guaranteed in a properly segmented or TLS-pinned deployment. Patched SDK versions eliminate the flawed validation.

Impact

This is a medium-severity information-disclosure flaw (CVSS 5.9) whose real-world urgency is tempered by its attack-complexity and exploitation signals. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) confirms a network-reachable, unauthenticated issue, but AC:H means successful exploitation depends on conditions outside the attacker's control (e.g. winning a race, forcing a malicious origin, or occupying a network path). The CISA SSVC framework reinforces a non-urgent posture: Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=partial. There is no CISA KEV listing, no reported public POC, and no EPSS score in the provided data, so there is no evidence of active or at-scale exploitation at time of analysis. One mild tension to flag: the CVSS claims C:H (high confidentiality impact) while SSVC rates Technical Impact as only 'partial' - these are not fully consistent, so the true data-exposure blast radius should be verified against the MSRC advisory. Net: a real but lower-priority issue - patch on a normal cycle rather than as an emergency, prioritizing systems where Key Vault secrets are especially sensitive.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positioned on the network path between an application and Azure Key Vault (or able to present a spoofed/untrusted origin) leverages the SDK's origin-validation weakness so the client accepts responses from an unauthorized source, disclosing secrets, keys, or certificate material over the network. The high attack complexity (AC:H) means the attacker must first achieve a privileged network position or trigger the specific flawed validation path. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Information disclosure in the Azure Key Vault client SDK packages occurs because the SDK fails to properly validate the origin of responses it consumes (CWE-346), allowing an unauthorized attacker positioned to supply or impersonate a network origin to expose sensitive data handled by applications built on the affected libraries. Exploitation is unauthenticated (PR:N) and requires no user interaction (UI:N), but carries high attack complexity (AC:H, CVSS 5.9) because the attacker must control or influence the network response or origin, typically via an in-path/MITM or origin-spoofing position; confidentiality impact is high while integrity and availability are unaffected. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and CISA SSVC records exploitation as none with automatable exploitation rated no, so urgency is driven primarily by whether deployments rely on the vulnerable SDK versions rather than by active threat activity.

RemediationAI

Apply the patched Azure Key Vault SDK packages released by Microsoft, using the fixed versions identified in the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-88132) and the EUVD range ceilings (azure-keyvault-administration 4.8.2, azure-keyvault-certificates 4.9.2, azure-keyvault-keys 4.10.2, and azure-keyvault-secrets 4.11.2 or later as applicable to each package line) - patch status is 'available per vendor advisory,' so confirm exact fixed builds against the advisory before upgrading, since the supplied ranges contain ordering anomalies. Until upgrade is complete, the most effective compensating control is to harden the transport and origin trust assumptions the SDK relies on: enforce strict TLS certificate validation and pinning for Key Vault endpoints, disable or restrict HTTP(S) proxy and custom-endpoint overrides in client configuration so responses cannot be transparently redirected, and ensure managed private endpoints or service-endpoint network isolation so in-path attackers cannot reach or spoof Key Vault traffic - the trade-off is that TLS pinning and proxy restrictions can break legitimate enterprise inspection proxies, and private-endpoint-only access removes public-network flexibility. Rotate or re-issue secrets, keys, and certificates that may have traversed an unpatched client on untrusted networks, and monitor SDK client logs for unexpected endpoint or origin changes; residual risk remains only where applications continue running vulnerable SDK versions. No public exploit is documented, so emergency out-of-band change windows are not mandated by exploitation evidence, but SD​K dependencies should be inventoried and upgraded on a normal high-priority cadence.

Affected VersionsENISA

azure-keyvault-administration 4.7.1 <4.8.2
Azure Key Vault Client SDK - (version not specified)
azure-keyvault-certificates 4.11.2 <4.9.2
azure-keyvault-keys 4.11.2 <4.10.2
azure-keyvault-secrets 4.11.2 <4.11.2

Affected Packages

euvd azure_keyvault_administration fix: 4.8.2
euvd azure_keyvault_certificates fix: 4.9.2
euvd azure_keyvault_keys fix: 4.10.2
euvd azure_keyvault_secrets fix: 4.11.2

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 4 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic origin validation error (CWE-346), the same root-cause class that underlies improper cross-origin trust decisions: the affected Azure Key Vault client SDK components (azure-keyvault-administration, azure-keyvault-certificates, azure-keyvault-keys, azure-keyvault-secrets, and the Azure Key Vault Client SDK) do not adequately verify that a response, endpoint, or origin is the legitimate Key Vault service before trusting and processing it. Because these SDKs are libraries embedded in customer applications, the vulnerable component is the client-side trust logic rather than the Key Vault service itself, which is why the CPE/affected-version data enumerates SDK package versions (for example azure-keyvault-administration 4.7.1 through <4.8.2, azure-keyvault-certificates through <4.9.2, azure-keyvault-keys through <4.10.2, and azure-keyvault-secrets through <4.11.2 as reported by EUVD). The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N describes a network-reachable disclosure that is unauthenticated and non-interactive but gated by the difficulty of gaining a position where the attacker can present a forged or unauthorized origin to the SDK - for instance on a compromised or hostile network path. The 'Hashicorp' tag suggests parallel or related ecosystem handling of secrets-management client validation issues, but the primary affected product family is Microsoft's Azure Key Vault SDK.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 5.9 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

Network-reachable (AV:N) and unauthenticated (PR:N), but AC:H because the attacker must force/spoof an untrusted origin; confidentiality-only impact (C:H, I:N, A:N) matches the information-disclosure nature.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.9

DescriptionCVE.org

Origin validation error in Azure Key Vault allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely-used Azure cloud Key Vault client SDKs across enterprise applications
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy