Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with low privileges locally
  2. Exploit
    Supply untrusted pointer to SSPI
  3. Execution
    Trigger invalid pointer dereference
  4. Impact
    Execute code as SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Untrusted pointer prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Requires a local, authenticated low-privileged session on the Windows host (AV:L, PR:L) - the attacker must already be able to run code on the machine, so this is a second-stage escalation primitive, not an initial-access or remote bug. The flaw is in the Security Support Provider Interface (SSPI) and is triggered by supplying an untrusted/attacker-controlled pointer that the component dereferences (CWE-822). LIMITING FACTORS: high attack complexity (AC:H) indicates a non-deterministic trigger such as a race condition or a precise memory layout that the attacker must reliably achieve, materially reducing exploit reliability; no user interaction is needed (UI:N) and scope is unchanged (S:U). Applies to default configurations across the broad list of affected Windows 10/11, Windows Server 2012 R2 through 2025, and Server Core installations below the fixed build numbers in the EUVD data.

Impact

Signals are largely consistent and point to a genuine but second-tier priority rather than an emergency. The Microsoft-supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N) describes a local privilege-escalation flaw requiring an authenticated foothold and a high-complexity trigger - not a remotely reachable or trivially automatable issue. CISA's SSVC framing reinforces this: Exploitation 'none' (no observed or public exploitation) and Automatable 'no', which caps real-world urgency, even though Technical Impact is rated 'total' (consistent with the C:H/I:H/A:H full-SYSTEM compromise once triggered). There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC indicator in the input, so this is not confirmed active exploitation. EPSS is not provided, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be factored in - STATE EXPLICITLY: no EPSS score was supplied. One data inconsistency: the input Tags include 'Information Disclosure', but the description and CVSS both describe an elevation-of-privilege (untrusted pointer dereference, CWE-822) issue - treat the tag as suspect, not the vector. Net: a high-impact-if-exploited local EoP that is valuable to an attacker already on the host (second-stage privilege escalation), but the AC:H trigger and lack of exploitation evidence make it a patch-on-normal-cycle item rather than a drop-everything fix for most environments; prioritize on multi-user, RDP, or shared Windows hosts.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged authenticated session on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing or stolen credentials) runs a crafted program that passes an untrusted pointer into the Security Support Provider Interface, causing an invalid dereference that corrupts memory and yields SYSTEM-level code execution. The high attack complexity (AC:H) implies the attacker must win a race or establish a specific memory state, so exploitation is reliable only with a well-engineered tool. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Windows Security Support Provider Interface (SSPI) lets an attacker who already holds a low-privileged local session on a Windows host run code at a higher integrity level, ultimately up to SYSTEM, by supplying a pointer that the component dereferences without validation. All supported branches are exposed - Windows 10 1607 through 22H2, Windows 11 23H2 through 26H2, and Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025, including Server Core installations, below the fixed build numbers published by the vendor. High attack complexity (AC:H) points to a non-deterministic trigger such as a race or a precise memory layout, so reliability is attacker-dependent; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as none, making this a second-stage escalation primitive rather than an urgent remote threat. The vendor has released patches and Microsoft lists the issue as requiring an authorized (authenticated, low-privileged) local attacker.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-88098 so each host reaches the fixed build for its branch - for example 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016, 10.0.20348.5761 for Server 2022, 10.0.26100.33650 for Server 2025, 10.0.26100.9711 / 10.0.26200.9711 / 10.0.26300.9711 / 10.0.28000.3231 for the Windows 11 branches, and 6.2.9200.26434 / 6.3.9600.23470 for Server 2012 / 2012 R2; see the vendor advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-88098. Patch status is 'patch available per vendor advisory', with fixed build numbers published in the EUVD and Microsoft guidance. Because the issue is a local, authenticated escalation primitive (AV:L/PR:L, AC:H), the compensating controls that matter most are reducing who can obtain an interactive or code-execution foothold on the host: enforce least privilege and remove unnecessary local administrator and interactive logon rights, restrict RDP and console access to trusted operators, and monitor for suspicious local processes spawning with elevated tokens. Additional hardening is available but carries trade-offs and should be tested first - enabling LSA protection (RunAsPPL) hardens the authentication process against this class of memory-corruption escalation but can break unsigned or legacy authentication plug-ins, and removing unused Security Support Providers from the registry narrows the attack surface yet may break applications that depend on NTLM, Kerberos or third-party SSP packages. Since AC:H makes exploitation non-deterministic, detection should focus on anomalous privilege-escalation behaviour and repeated crash/restart patterns in authentication-related processes rather than on a specific exploit signature.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

SSPI is the Windows abstraction layer that brokers authentication between applications and Security Support Providers (NTLM, Kerberos, Negotiate, Schannel, and third-party packages), and it is exercised inside trusted authentication flows such as LSASS. The root cause class is CWE-822, untrusted pointer dereference: a pointer value that is influenced by the caller or by attacker-controlled input reaches a dereference in the SSPI path without adequate validation, so the component reads or acts on a memory address the attacker effectively chose. Under the assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) this yields full loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability within the local OS scope while the attacker still needs an existing authenticated low-privileged session - AV:L/PR:L confirm this is not an initial-access or remotely reachable flaw and UI:N confirms no victim interaction is required. AC:H indicates the trigger is not deterministic; the attacker must win a race or arrange a specific heap/memory layout to convert the bad dereference into a reliable escalation, which materially lowers practical exploit reliability and explains the SSVC 'Automatable: no' rating. Technical impact is total (full host compromise once reliable code execution in the higher-privileged context is achieved), but exploitation remains local and post-compromise. Affected CPE coverage spans the Windows 10 and Windows 11 client builds and the Windows Server 2012/2012 R2/2016/2019/2022/2025 families, including Server Core, meaning default configurations of both clients and servers are in scope.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local-only EoP needing an existing low-priv session (AV:L/PR:L), a race/precise-state trigger (AC:H), no user interaction, yielding full SYSTEM compromise (C/I/A:H).

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Untrusted pointer dereference in Windows Security Support Provider Interface allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity privilege escalation flaw in Microsoft Windows SSPI affects a broad range of Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server releases, including Server Core. If exploited after an initial local compromise, it could let an adversary gain SYSTEM-level control of a host, increasing the risk of lateral movement and credential theft across the estate. Although no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and attack complexity is high, the breadth of affected systems makes timely patching a management priority.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 90% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
SSPI is a core authentication component in all supported Windows versions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy