Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege authenticated access
-
DeliverySend crafted input through network-facing operation
-
ExploitInject special elements into downstream component call
-
ExecutionDownstream component misinterprets injected data
-
ImpactElevate privileges and tamper with storage operations
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Input neutralization, injection prevention
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess low-level authorized/authenticated access (PR:L) to an application using the vulnerable Azure Storage client libraries (azure-storage-blob-batch 1.0.0 and the Azure Storage Blobs Java client library) and to reach a network-exposed operation that forwards attacker-influenced input to a downstream component without neutralizing special elements (CWE-74). The limiting factors are the pre-existing privilege requirement and dependence on how the consuming application feeds untrusted data into the library's downstream calls; no user interaction is needed (UI:N), and there is no confidentiality impact (C:N), only integrity and availability (I:H/A:H). |
| Impact | Signals are mixed and lean toward lower real-world urgency despite the high 8.1 base score. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity attack that nonetheless requires the attacker to already hold some privileges (PR:L), and impact is limited to integrity and availability (C:N/I:H/A:H) with no confidentiality loss and no scope change (S:U). CISA SSVC reinforces a non-urgent posture: Exploitation=none (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable=no (cannot be reliably mass-exploited), though Technical Impact=total. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC, so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' EPSS was not provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified here. Net assessment: this is a credible but not emergency-grade issue - a high-CVSS flaw whose practical risk is tempered by the required pre-existing privilege and the absence of any exploitation evidence. One point to verify: CWE-74 injection via a downstream component in a client library typically depends on how the consuming application passes untrusted input, which the terse description does not detail - confirm the concrete sink with Microsoft's MSRC advisory. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already holds low-level authenticated access abuses improperly neutralized special elements that the Azure Storage client library passes to a downstream component, injecting content that the downstream component interprets as commands or control data. Because the vector is network-based and low-complexity (AV:N/AC:L), the attacker leverages this to elevate privileges and tamper with or disrupt storage operations (I:H/A:H). No public exploit code or active exploitation is known at time of analysis, and SSVC rates exploitation as none. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Improper neutralization of special elements (CWE-74) in Microsoft's Azure Storage client libraries - azure-storage-blob-batch 1.0.0 and the Azure Storage Blobs client library for Java - allows an attacker who already holds low-level authorized access (PR:L) to escalate privileges over the network by routing crafted input through the library into a downstream component that does not sanitize it. The weakness requires no user interaction (UI:N) and produces high integrity and availability impact (I:H/A:H) with no confidentiality loss (C:N), which is consistent with Microsoft's 'Code Injection' tagging. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as 'none' and the issue as not automatable, so real-world urgency sits below what the 8.1 base score alone would imply.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data, so the primary action is to obtain the fixed library version from Microsoft's MSRC update guide for CVE-2026-88094 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-88094) and upgrade azure-storage-blob-batch from 1.0.0 and the Azure Storage Blobs Java client library to that release; track the NVD entry (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-88094) for the version mapping as it is published. Because exploitation requires pre-existing low-level authorization (PR:L) and depends on the application passing untrusted data into the library's downstream calls, the most effective compensating control is input validation at the application boundary: reject or strictly encode any user-supplied value that reaches batch-blob or Storage Blobs SDK operations, accepting the trade-off that overly strict filtering can break legitimate payloads containing special characters. Additionally, restrict network exposure of services that invoke these libraries to trusted clients and enforce least-privilege role assignments so that a compromised low-privilege principal has no path to the privileged operations the flaw can reach; this reduces blast radius but does not eliminate the injection itself. Disabling batch blob operations or the affected Java SDK code paths where they are not business-critical removes the attack surface entirely, at the cost of losing that functionality until a patched version is deployed and validated.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-74, improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component (injection) - the classic intermediary case where a library faithfully forwards attacker-influenced data to another parser, interpreter, or service without escaping it, so the injection fires in the downstream consumer rather than in the library itself. Here the affected technology is the Azure Storage SDK surface: the Python-side package azure-storage-blob-batch at version 1.0.0 (per EUVD version data 'azure-storage-blob-batch 1.0.0 <azure-storage-blob-batch') and the Azure Storage Blobs client library for Java. Because these components sit between an application and Azure Storage's REST endpoints and batch-processing paths, the exploitability depends on how the consuming application feeds untrusted data into the library's downstream calls; the library supplies the unescaped delivery mechanism rather than the vulnerability being reachable in isolation. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H) confirms network reachability with low attack complexity, but requires the attacker to already be authorized at a low privilege level, and scope remains unchanged, meaning the downstream impact stays within the same security authority.
Know when Java gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable low-complexity injection requiring a pre-existing low privilege (PR:L); downstream injection yields integrity/availability impact with no confidentiality loss and no scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
DescriptionCVE.org
Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Azure Storage Library allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Executive ViewAI
Microsoft's Azure Storage client libraries for .NET batch operations (azure-storage-blob-batch 1.0.0) and Java are affected by a high-severity input-handling flaw that lets an already-authorized low-privilege user route crafted data through the library into a downstream component, potentially corrupting or disrupting that component's data and availability. Because the code is embedded in our own applications rather than running as a standalone service, every internal or customer-facing system built on these libraries inherits the exposure, and the affected dependency is widely reused across development teams. Leadership should care that no vendor patch is currently available, so remediation depends on our own detection, input-validation, and dependency-governance controls while Microsoft develops a fix.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce strict input validation and neutralization at the boundary where library output enters any downstream component (addressing CWE-74 directly); restrict and review low-privilege authenticated accounts that can reach affected code paths; apply least-privilege and network segmentation to limit reachable downstream components; enable enhanced logging and anomaly detection on batch storage operations; and evaluate substituting or isolating the affected library versions until a fix is available.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.
Oracle Java SE 7 Update 6 and earlier contains multiple sandbox bypass vulnerabilities via the ClassFinder and forName m
Remote code execution in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Integrator, and Tivoli Common Reporting allows unauthenti
Java Runtime Environment sandbox bypass via incorrect image channel verification in 2D component allows remote unauthent
Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug
JBoss Seam 2 in Red Hat JBoss EAP 4.3.0 fails to sanitize JBoss Expression Language inputs, allowing remote attackers to
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 up
Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Up
The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier allow
Remote unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary code on Adobe ColdFusion servers through Java deserialization fla
The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during
EUVD-2026-100265
GHSA-mv49-99p5-ffp9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB