Skip to main content

Windows Resource Management CVE-2026-87702

| EUVDEUVD-2026-100081 HIGH
Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-8vmc-2g86-4m99
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Invoke vulnerable MRM code path
  3. Exploit
    Trigger integer overflow (CWE-190)
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory for privilege escalation
  5. Impact
    Execute code as SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integer overflow checks
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess local, authenticated access to the target Windows host with at least low-level privileges (PR:L) - this is a privilege-escalation flaw, not a remote entry point, so a prior foothold is a hard prerequisite. The vulnerable code path lies in Windows Resource Management (MRM); the attacker must be able to supply input that reaches and triggers the integer overflow (CWE-190) in that component. Limiting factors: no remote network vector (AV:L), so it cannot be triggered directly over the network; however, no user interaction is needed (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L), so once local access is obtained, exploitation is straightforward. Affected systems are those running Windows builds below the patched versions listed in the EUVD data (spanning Windows 10/11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025); fully patched hosts are not exploitable.

Impact

This is a credible but not emergency-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8) describes a local privilege-escalation flaw: the attacker must already have local, authenticated access with low privileges (PR:L), no user interaction is required (UI:N), attack complexity is low (AC:L), and successful exploitation yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the affected system (C:H/I:H/A:H, scope unchanged). An integer overflow/wraparound (CWE-190) in Windows Resource Management (MRM) consistent with a memory-corruption EoP primitive. No EPSS score, SSVC decision data, KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS signal and the description are internally consistent (both point to local access), with no contradictions to flag. The practical risk profile is typical of Patch-Tuesday-class Windows local EoP bugs: valuable as a post-compromise or second-stage step for attackers who already have a foothold, rather than an internet-facing initial-access vulnerability. Given Windows' enormous deployment footprint, prioritize routine patching, but this does not demand out-of-band emergency response in the absence of KEV/EPSS/POC signals.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a compromised standard user account, or a prior exploit) invokes the vulnerable Windows Resource Management (MRM) code path with crafted input that triggers an integer overflow, corrupting memory to escalate to SYSTEM-level privileges. No user interaction is required and attack complexity is low. No public proof-of-concept exploit was identified in the provided data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Microsoft's Windows Resource Management (MRM) component lets an authenticated attacker who already holds low-level privileges on a host trigger an integer overflow (CWE-190) and elevate to higher integrity, with full impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 7.8, AV:L/PR:L/UI:N). Exploitation is not remote - it requires an existing local foothold - but needs no user interaction and has low attack complexity, so once any code execution or interactive access is obtained on an unpatched build, escalation is straightforward. Windows 10, Windows 11 (23H2 through 26H2), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 builds below the vendor's fixed revision levels are affected; there is no public exploit code identified and no confirmed active exploitation (no CISA KEV listing) at time of analysis, although vendor patches are available.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-87702 documented at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-87702, which raises each affected platform to its fixed build - Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9612, 1809/Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9376, 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, 24H2/Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.9711 (Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650), 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231, 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711, Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26434, Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23470, and Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761; where legacy builds are past end of servicing, migrate to a supported release or subscribe to Extended Security Updates rather than relying on workarounds. Because this is a local privilege-escalation flaw with a hard prerequisite of existing low-privileged access, prioritize patching on multi-user and VDI/RDS hosts and servers where untrusted local accounts exist. Compensating controls until patching completes carry trade-offs: enforce least privilege and remove unnecessary interactive logon rights (RDP, console, scheduled-task and service-account paths) so fewer principals can reach the MRM code path - this can break legitimate remote administration workflows; apply application control/allowlisting (WDAC or AppLocker) to block untrusted binaries and crafted resource files from executing - this requires an accurate, maintained policy or it will block legitimate software; and enable Credential Guard, LSASS protection, and EDR behavioral detection for suspicious process-token or integrity-level changes to catch post-escalation activity, understanding these are detective rather than preventive. There is no known configuration flag that disables MRM resource loading without breaking MUI localization and application resource resolution, so network- or feature-level disabling is not a viable mitigation and patching remains the only complete fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The defect is an integer overflow or wraparound (CWE-190) in Windows Resource Management, the subsystem responsible for loading and resolving Windows resource data - MUI language resources, resource-only DLLs, and related resource package/index handling used by the resource manager stack. MRM parses attacker-influenced resource metadata and performs arithmetic on size, offset, or count fields; when a computed value wraps or is truncated, the resulting allocation or bounds check is inconsistent with the data subsequently consumed, producing a memory-safety condition (the source tags flag both Integer Overflow and Buffer Overflow) that can be abused to corrupt memory and execute code in a more privileged context. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the exploit is local-only, requires low privileges (PR:L, i.e. the attacker is already authenticated on the box), needs no user interaction, and does not cross a security scope boundary - classic local privilege-escalation shape in a user-mode Windows component. Because the affected code runs with the privileges of the invoking process, a successful trigger lets a low-privileged local user gain higher-integrity execution, typically up to SYSTEM depending on the hosting service that loads the crafted resource.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local privilege escalation requiring an existing low-privileged foothold (AV:L, PR:L), no user interaction, low complexity, yielding full SYSTEM-level C/I/A impact within the same host (S:U).

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Resource Management (MRM) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege escalation flaw in Microsoft Windows Resource Management affects Windows 10, Windows 11 (23H2 through 26H2), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, allowing an attacker with an existing low-privilege foothold to gain elevated control of a host. Because these platforms are pervasive across enterprise endpoints and servers, unpatched systems raise the risk of credential theft, lateral movement, and operational disruption following an initial intrusion. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the broad exposure and straightforward local escalation make timely patching a priority.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Microsoft Windows client and server OS, present in nearly all environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Integer overflow occurs when an arithmetic operation produces a result that exceeds the maximum value a given integer type can store.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy