Skip to main content

Azure Database for PostgreSQL CVE-2026-85878

| EUVDEUVD-2026-82597 CRITICAL
Improper Authorization (CWE-285)
2026-09-18 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-9vgx-8238-xgwc
9.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privilege authenticated access
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted request over network
  3. Exploit
    Trigger improper authorization check
  4. Execution
    Escalate beyond assigned scope
  5. Impact
    Access or modify out-of-scope database resources

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization verification
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires a valid, low-privileged authenticated identity with existing access to Azure Database for PostgreSQL (PR:L) - for example a limited database role or a scoped Azure RBAC/subscription principal; it is NOT exploitable by fully unauthenticated internet attackers. Given AV:N/AC:L/UI:N, once that foothold exists no user interaction and no special client conditions are needed, and it works over the network against the managed service. Limiting factors: the authentication prerequisite (attacker must already hold some legitimate access to the service or tenant) and the fact that the fix is applied server-side by Microsoft, so environments patched by the vendor are no longer exposed.

Impact

This is a high-priority issue on paper: the vendor (Microsoft) CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H yields 9.9, driven by low attack complexity, no user interaction, a scope change (S:C), and total confidentiality/integrity/availability impact - consistent with an authorization flaw letting a low-privileged, already-authenticated tenant escape its authorization boundary in a multi-tenant managed database. However, several severity-tempering and confidence signals must be stated explicitly: PR:L means this is NOT unauthenticated - an attacker needs valid low-level access (e.g., a legitimate database/subscription foothold), which the 9.9 headline obscures. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the provided data, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or automatable mass-exploitation; treat this as a targeted, credential-gated risk rather than an internet-wide worm-class threat. As an Azure cloud service, the flaw is remediated server-side by Microsoft with no customer patch, CPE, or affected-version data - reducing customer action but also meaning the fix cannot be independently verified. Note also a taxonomy conflict: the 'Authentication Bypass' tag conflicts with CWE-285 (improper authorization) - this is an authorization-boundary escape, not an authentication bypass.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A tenant with a legitimate but low-privileged foothold on Azure Database for PostgreSQL (e.g., a limited database role or a low-privilege subscription/RBAC identity) sends crafted requests that the service authorizes incorrectly, granting access or actions beyond the attacker's assigned scope. Because the scope changes (S:C), the escalation reaches resources or a control plane outside the attacker's original authorization boundary, potentially exposing or modifying other tenants' data. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires pre-existing authenticated access.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: Vendor states no customer action required.
No patch listed yet 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 18, 2026

Privilege escalation in Azure Database for PostgreSQL allows an authenticated attacker with low privileges to elevate privileges over the network, potentially achieving full control over database resources. With a critical CVSS score of 9.9 due to scope change and high impact, the flaw requires a valid low-privileged identity to exploit; no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft applies a server-side fix for Azure Database for PostgreSQL; ensure your instance is updated to the latest version per the MSRC advisory (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-85878). No customer-side patch is required, but administrators should verify that the managed service has been updated. As compensating controls, restrict network access to the database using private endpoints, firewall rules, or virtual network service endpoints, and enforce least privilege by auditing and minimizing low-privileged database roles and Azure RBAC assignments. Enable advanced threat protection and audit logging to detect privilege escalation attempts. Trade-offs: network restrictions may impact legitimate connectivity, and privilege reduction may require application changes.

Affected VersionsENISA

Azure HorizonDB - (version not specified)

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-285 (Improper Authorization) is the root cause. Azure Database for PostgreSQL is a Microsoft-managed relational database service. The vulnerability allows a low-privileged authenticated user (PR:L) to bypass authorization controls and elevate privileges remotely (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction (UI:N). The scope change (S:C) indicates that the vulnerable component can affect resources beyond its security scope, potentially enabling cross-tenant or cross-database access. The CVSS vector yields a 9.9 score due to total confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (C:H/I:H/A:H). Microsoft applies the fix server-side, so patched environments are no longer exposed.

Know when Azure gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 9.9 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.9 CRITICAL

Authenticated low-privilege attacker (PR:L) over network with no interaction; improper authorization crosses tenant/authorization boundary (S:C) enabling full C/I/A impact in a multi-tenant DBaaS.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper authorization in Azure Database for PostgreSQL allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical privilege escalation vulnerability in Azure Database for PostgreSQL (CVE-2026-85878) could allow a low-privileged user to gain full control over database resources, risking unauthorized access to sensitive organizational data. With no vendor patch currently available and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, leadership should prioritize exposure reduction and enhanced monitoring. Any business unit relying on Azure Database for PostgreSQL for critical workloads is affected, making immediate risk assessment and access controls essential.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include network isolation (private endpoints, firewall rules), enforcing least privilege, enabling auditing and Azure Defender for PostgreSQL, rotating credentials, and monitoring for anomalous privilege escalation events.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 55% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely-deployed Azure managed PostgreSQL database-as-a-service
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:N/A
Service Type
Hosted
Vendor-managed, no client patch needed
Social Media
2
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
Vendor states no customer action required
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

51
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +50
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

More in Azure

View all
CVE-2026-62874 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 18

Privilege escalation in Microsoft's Azure Billing service allows unauthenticated, remote attackers to reach full comprom

CVE-2026-23889 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Jan 26

Path traversal in pnpm's tarball extraction on Windows allows attackers to write files outside the intended package dire

CVE-2026-31957 CRITICAL
10.0 Mar 11

Default password in Himmelblau Azure Entra ID suite 3.0.0-3.0.x. CVSS 10.0.

CVE-2026-70200 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 17

Path traversal in Microsoft's Azure Logic Apps (CWE-22) lets a remote, unauthenticated attacker escape an intended restr

CVE-2025-20286 CRITICAL
9.9 Jun 04

Default credentials in Cisco ISE cloud deployments on AWS/Azure/OCI. CVSS 9.9.

CVE-2026-85889 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 17

Unauthenticated remote attackers can reach a critical function inside Microsoft Azure AI Foundry that performs a privile

CVE-2026-21531 CRITICAL
9.8 Feb 10

Deserialization of untrusted data in Azure SDK allows unauthorized code execution over a network. EPSS 0.32%.

CVE-2026-24300 CRITICAL
9.8 Feb 05

Elevation of privilege vulnerability in Azure Front Door allows attackers to gain elevated access. Microsoft Azure cloud

CVE-2026-24306 CRITICAL
9.8 Jan 22

Azure Front Door has an improper access control vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) allowing unauthorized attackers to elevate priv

CVE-2026-3224 CRITICAL
9.8 Mar 03

Azure AD auth bypass in Devolutions Server 2025.3.15.0 and earlier.

CVE-2026-23518 CRITICAL
9.8 Jan 21

Fleet device management software has a signature verification bypass that allows attackers to install malicious firmware

CVE-2026-87701 CRITICAL
9.6 Sep 17

Privilege elevation in Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB allows an attacker who already holds valid low-level authorization to a

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy