Skip to main content

Stormshield Network Security CVE-2026-8480

| EUVDEUVD-2026-41043 MEDIUM
Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295)
2026-07-01 airbus GHSA-2j5q-9jw8-9qj5
4.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: airbus
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain revoked SNS admin client certificate
  2. Delivery
    Gain adjacent network access to captive-admin portal
  3. Exploit
    Present revoked certificate in TLS handshake
  4. Execution
    Portal skips revocation validation
  5. Impact
    Receive full administrative session

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Certificate validation
Exploitation Conditions

Three specific prerequisites must be met: (1) the attacker must possess a client certificate that was previously issued for authentication to the SNS captive-admin portal and has since been revoked - arbitrary certificates or certificates for other systems are not usable; (2) the attacker must have adjacent network access to the captive-admin portal's listening interface (AV:A - not exploitable from the open internet unless the portal is explicitly internet-exposed, which would be atypical for a management interface); (3) the target SNS instance must be running one of the affected version branches (4.3.0-4.3.41, 4.4.0-4.8.15, or 5.0.2 EA-5.0.5) with the captive-admin portal feature active. What limits exploitation: the attacker must already hold a specific revoked certificate issued for this portal, which significantly constrains the threat actor population to insiders, ex-administrators, or actors who have separately compromised a certificate. The PR:N CVSS rating reflects that the portal itself provides no barrier once the certificate is presented, but possession of the certificate is a substantial prerequisite.

Impact

The vendor-assigned CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 (Medium, AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) significantly understates real-world impact for environments using client certificate authentication for SNS administration. The C:L/I:N/A:N impact tuple treats this as a minor information disclosure, but administrative portal access to a network security appliance realistically implies full exposure of security policy configuration, VPN credentials, network topology data, and the ability to alter firewall rules - warranting C:H/I:H in an independent assessment. The AV:A (Adjacent Network) vector appropriately limits exposure to actors who can reach the captive-admin portal's network segment. No EPSS score was provided, KEV status is absent (no confirmed active exploitation), and no POC has been published. The primary real-world risk vector is insider threat or ex-administrator scenarios where a revoked certificate remains in an attacker's possession. EPSS and active exploitation data are missing - risk prioritization should be weighted by whether certificate revocation is actively relied upon in the affected environment's PKI.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A former administrator whose client certificate was revoked after offboarding connects to the internal management network segment hosting the SNS captive-admin portal. Using standard TLS client tooling (e.g., curl with the certificate and key files), they authenticate to the portal - the portal accepts the revoked certificate without checking revocation status and grants full administrative access to the firewall appliance. No public exploit code is available; the attack requires only possession of the revoked certificate file and network adjacency.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 01, 2026

Administrative access to the Stormshield Network Security captive-admin portal is bypassed when an attacker presents a revoked client certificate, because the portal does not enforce certificate revocation checks during TLS mutual authentication. Affected versions span three branches: 4.3.0-4.3.41, 4.4.0-4.8.15, and 5.0.2 EA-5.0.5. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is absent from CISA KEV, but the threat actor population is meaningfully constrained - exploitation requires prior possession of a certificate that was specifically issued for this portal and then revoked.

RemediationAI

Consult the Stormshield advisory at https://advisories.stormshield.eu/2026-002/ for the vendor-released patch; the exact fixed version number is not specified in available intelligence and cannot be independently confirmed. As an immediate compensating control, restrict network access to the captive-admin portal using firewall ACLs or management VLAN segmentation so that only trusted hosts on dedicated management segments can reach it, reducing the AV:A attack surface to a narrower population. Organizations should also audit all currently revoked certificates and, where feasible, re-issue certificates for active administrators from a new CA or with a new serial, effectively rendering any in-scope revoked certificates entirely invalid even without portal-side enforcement. If the portal supports IP-based access restrictions, enable them immediately. Note: restricting access does not fix the revocation check failure - it only reduces the window of exposure until the patch can be applied.

Affected VersionsENISA

StormShield Network Security 5.0.2 EA ≤5.0.5
StormShield Network Security 4.4.0 ≤4.8.15
StormShield Network Security 4.3.0 ≤4.3.41

Affected Packages

euvd stormshield_network_security no fix
euvd stormshield_network_security_5_0_2_ea no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation): the captive-admin portal performs TLS client certificate authentication but does not verify revocation status via CRL (Certificate Revocation List) or OCSP (Online Certificate Status Protocol). In a correctly implemented PKI-based authentication flow, a revoked certificate should be rejected at the TLS handshake stage; here it is accepted as valid. The affected product is Stormshield Network Security (SNS), a French network firewall and UTM appliance, per CPE cpe:2.3:a:stormshield:stormshield_network_security across the listed version branches. The captive-admin portal is a dedicated administrative management interface. Certificate revocation is a fundamental lifecycle control used when administrator credentials are compromised or personnel are offboarded; its absence in revocation enforcement invalidates that control entirely.

Know when Stormshield Network Security gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (airbus) PRIMARY 4.3 MEDIUM
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Adjacent network required (AV:A); admin portal access implies full config read (C:H) and write (I:H); no direct availability impact described.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (airbus).

CVSS VectorVendor: airbus

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was discovered on Stormshield Network Security 4.3.0  to 4.3.41 (included), 4.4.0 to 4.8.15 (included) , 5.0.2 EA to 5.0.5 (included)

A revoked client certificate can still be used to authenticate to the captive‑admin portal, allowing an attacker who possesses the revoked certificate to gain administrative access.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 100% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche French network security appliance, limited global enterprise footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

22
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +22
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2023-0286 HIGH
7.4 Feb 08

There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. Rated high sev

CVE-2022-37434 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 05

zlib through 1.2.12 has a heap-based buffer over-read or buffer overflow in inflate in inflate.c via a large gzip header

CVE-2020-7465 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 06

The L2TP implementation of MPD before 5.9 allows a remote attacker who can send specifically crafted L2TP control packet

CVE-2020-7466 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 06

The PPP implementation of MPD before 5.9 allows a remote attacker who can send specifically crafted PPP authentication m

CVE-2023-20032 CRITICAL
9.8 Mar 01

On Feb 15, 2023, the following vulnerability in the ClamAV scanning library was disclosed: A vulnerability in the HFS+ p

CVE-2026-111090 HIGH
7.8 Oct 20

Stormshield Network Security (SNS) can accept forged update and license files because a logic error in its signature ver

CVE-2026-113469 HIGH
7.5 Oct 20

Stormshield Network Security's Autoupdate routine can accept unauthenticated dynamic data files because of a logic error

CVE-2025-48707 HIGH
7.5 Sep 25

An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) before 5.0.1. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnera

CVE-2023-28616 HIGH
7.5 Dec 26

An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) before 4.3.17, 4.4.x through 4.6.x before 4.6.4, and 4.7.x

CVE-2023-47091 HIGH
7.5 Dec 25

An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) SNS 4.3.13 through 4.3.22 before 4.3.23, SNS 4.6.0 through

CVE-2023-26095 HIGH
7.5 Aug 28

ASQ in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 4.3.15 before 4.3.16 and 4.6.x before 4.6.3 allows a crash when analysing a cr

CVE-2022-40617 HIGH
7.5 Oct 31

strongSwan before 5.9.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service in the revocation plugin by sending a craft

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy