Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach webhook receiver endpoint (AV:N, PR:N)
-
DeliverySend crafted diagnostics:ping webhook per template ID
-
ExploitHMAC check skipped after template lookup
-
ExecutionObserve HTTP 200 vs 403 oracle
-
ImpactEnumerate webhook-configured Job/WFJT IDs
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Response uniformity
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a reachable automation-controller instance where at least one Job Template or Workflow Job Template has a Bitbucket Data Center webhook configured - the oracle only distinguishes configured (HTTP 200) from unconfigured/nonexistent (HTTP 403) targets, so value depends on Bitbucket DC integration being in use. No authentication and no knowledge of the secret webhook_key are needed (PR:N), and no user interaction is required. The vulnerable path is the unauthenticated Bitbucket DC webhook receiver's handling of diagnostics:ping events, where HMAC signature verification is skipped after the template lookup. Limiting factors: the attacker must have network access to the webhook endpoint, and the disclosed information is limited to which template IDs are webhook-enabled - no secrets, code execution, or elevated access follow. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but low-priority information-disclosure/enumeration issue, not a high-impact flaw. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N = 5.3 MEDIUM) is internally consistent with the description: an unauthenticated network attacker exploits an HTTP 200-vs-403 response discrepancy in the Bitbucket Data Center webhook receiver as an existence oracle, gaining only limited confidentiality (C:L) - which Job Template / Workflow Job Template IDs have a Bitbucket DC webhook configured - with no integrity, availability, or scope impact and no recovery of the secret webhook_key. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the provided data, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No SSVC decision data is provided. The real-world ceiling is low: the attacker learns configuration metadata (which template IDs are webhook-enabled), not credentials or code execution. Note this is the ONLY unauthenticated (PR:N) member of the Red Hat AAP2 automation-controller vulnerability family reported in this batch, which slightly raises its practical reachability versus its authenticated siblings, but the payoff remains reconnaissance-grade. Missing data explicitly: no EPSS, no KEV, no POC, no fixed version, no independent advisory beyond the Red Hat CVE page and Bugzilla 2527210. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker who can reach the automation-controller's Bitbucket DC webhook endpoint sends crafted diagnostics:ping webhook requests iterating over Job Template and Workflow Job Template IDs, without any valid webhook_key. Because HMAC signature verification is skipped for ping events after the template lookup, the endpoint returns HTTP 200 for IDs that have a Bitbucket DC webhook configured and HTTP 403 otherwise, letting the attacker map webhook-enabled templates. No public POC is identified, but the low attack complexity (AC:L) and lack of authentication (PR:N) make the enumeration trivial to script. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 23, 2026
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 (automation-controller) lets an unauthenticated remote attacker enumerate which Job Template and Workflow Job Template IDs have a Bitbucket Data Center webhook configured, by abusing an observable response discrepancy in the Bitbucket DC webhook receiver. For diagnostics:ping events the receiver performs the template lookup before HMAC signature verification is skipped, so the endpoint returns HTTP 200 for a template with a Bitbucket DC webhook and HTTP 403 otherwise - an oracle that requires neither authentication (PR:N in the assessed vector) nor knowledge of the secret webhook_key. Assessed at CVSS 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N), this is a low-impact information-disclosure and enumeration issue: no secrets, code execution, or elevated access are exposed; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no confirmed actively exploited status.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis - the provided CVE data contains no fixed version, so confirm current status on the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84717 and Bugzilla 2527210 before planning upgrades. In the interim, apply targeted compensating controls: restrict network access to the Bitbucket Data Center webhook receiver endpoint (allow-listing only trusted Bitbucket DC source addresses at a reverse proxy, WAF, or firewall) so external scanners cannot reach the oracle - the trade-off is that this also blocks legitimate webhook delivery from any source outside the allow-list, and breaks delivery if the Bitbucket DC egress address changes; and remove or disable Bitbucket DC webhooks on any Job Template or Workflow Job Template that does not require them, which shrinks the set of enumerable targets but naturally disables the associated automation triggers. Because the only disclosed information is which template IDs are webhook-enabled, no credential rotation or secret exposure response is required; still, monitor webhook receiver logs for repeated 200/403 response patterns from a single source as a probing indicator, recognizing that this is a detection-only measure and not a fix.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw sits in the unauthenticated Bitbucket Data Center webhook receiver shipped with the automation-controller component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 (the same code lineage as upstream AWX). Bitbucket DC integrations normally authenticate inbound webhook deliveries by computing an HMAC over the request body using a per-template secret (webhook_key) and comparing it to the signature header; the receiver here instead resolves the target Job Template / Workflow Job Template first, and only afterwards handles the diagnostics:ping event - the lifecycle event Bitbucket sends when a webhook is created or tested - without performing that HMAC check. Because the template lookup result is still reflected in the HTTP status code, the ordering bug produces a classic CWE-204 (Observable Response Discrepancy): HTTP 200 reveals that a given template ID exists and has a Bitbucket DC webhook configured, while HTTP 403 indicates it does not (or does not exist). The impact class is purely informational - an attacker learns the set of webhook-enabled template IDs - and the enumeration is only meaningful on instances where the Bitbucket DC integration is actually in use, since non-integrated deployments yield no distinguishing configured targets.
Know when Django gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Unauthenticated remote oracle (AV:N/PR:N/AC:L) leaking only which template IDs have webhooks configured, so C:L with no integrity, availability, or scope impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorVendor: redhat
DescriptionCVE.org
A flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform automation-controller. The unauthenticated Bitbucket Data Center webhook receiver skips HMAC signature verification for diagnostics:ping events after it has already looked up the target template, causing the endpoint to return HTTP 200 for a template that has a Bitbucket DC webhook configured and HTTP 403 otherwise. An unauthenticated remote attacker can use this response discrepancy as an oracle to enumerate which Job Template and Workflow Job Template IDs have Bitbucket DC webhooks configured, without knowing the secret webhook_key.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
The package python/cpython from 0 and before 3.6.13, from 3.7.0 and before 3.7.10, from 3.8.0 and before 3.8.8, from 3.9
In Django 1.10.x before 1.10.8 and 1.11.x before 1.11.5, HTML autoescaping was disabled in a portion of the template for
An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulne
Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input
Django before 1.11.27, 2.x before 2.2.9, and 3.x before 3.0.1 allows account takeover. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8
An authentication/authorization bypass in the djust Python live-view framework (versions prior to 1.0.7) lets unauthenti
Unauthenticated arbitrary Python module import in djust before 1.0.7 lets any client that can reach the WebSocket or SSE
Django 1.11 before 1.11.29, 2.2 before 2.2.11, and 3.0 before 3.0.4 allows SQL Injection if untrusted data is used as a
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the dismissChangeRelatedObjectPopup function in contrib/admin/static/admin/j
Forged content modification in django-page-cms through 2.0.13 lets unauthenticated remote attackers exploit five CSRF-ex
Cross-site request forgery in djust's Server-Sent-Events transport affects all versions prior to 1.0.7 and allows a cros
Unauthenticated remote attackers can read live Django view and session state and invoke server-side handlers through dju
EUVD-2026-85612
GHSA-2r6r-cm6p-cm76
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB