Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessInstall malicious app on device
-
ExploitInvoke API with improper access validation
-
ExecutionBypass access-control check
-
ImpactRead protected user data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a locally-installed app already executing on the device within the app sandbox (PR:L, AV:L): the attacker must first get a crafted application onto the target (via sideloading, enterprise/developer provisioning, or an app that passed App Store/notarization review). No remote network vector and no victim interaction beyond running the app (UI:N) are needed, but exploitation is limited to confidentiality - reading protected user data - with no integrity or availability impact (I:N/A:N). Limiting factors: exploitation is bounded by Apple's app-distribution controls and sandbox, and is fully remediated by updating to iOS/iPadOS 27, macOS 27 (Golden Gate) / 26.7 (Tahoe), or visionOS 27. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-priority issue rather than an urgent emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 5.5 MEDIUM) describes a locally-exploitable confidentiality-only flaw: a malicious or compromised app already present and running on the device (PR:L) can read protected user data, with no integrity or availability impact. Every corroborating signal points the same direction and is internally consistent - there is no conflict to flag. EPSS is very low (0.16%, 5th percentile), CISA SSVC rates Exploitation as 'none', Automatable 'no', and Technical Impact 'partial', the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, and no public POC is referenced. Thus the high CVSS confidentiality rating is tempered by the local attack vector and the precondition that an attacker must already get a crafted app running on the target device (Apple's sandbox/notarization and App Store review are mitigating factors). The realistic risk is that of a privacy/sandbox-escape primitive useful as one link in a larger compromise or in targeted spyware chains, not a wormable or mass-exploitable network bug. Priority: patch in normal cycle; elevate only for high-value targets subject to targeted mobile attacks. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A user installs a seemingly benign app (sideloaded, or one that passed review) that runs within the normal app sandbox. Exploiting the improper access-control validation, the app bypasses the entitlement/authorization check and reads protected user data (e.g., private files or sensitive personal information) it should not be permitted to access. No public exploit code has been identified, and no user interaction beyond running the app is required. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 20, 2026
Improper access-control validation in Apple's operating systems lets a locally installed app read protected user data that should be off-limits to it. The flaw affects iOS and iPadOS before 27, macOS Tahoe before 26.7 and macOS Golden Gate before 27, and visionOS before 27; exploitation requires an attacker to first get a crafted app onto the device, since the vector is local with low privileges (AV:L/PR:L) and no user interaction beyond launching the app (UI:N). Impact is confidentiality-only (C:H/I:N/A:N) with a CVSS base score of 5.5, EPSS is low at 0.16% (5th percentile), CISA SSVC records no exploitation, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Tahoe 26.7, or visionOS 27 as applicable - Apple documents the fixes in advisories https://support.apple.com/en-us/149034, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149035, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149038, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/149042. Until devices are updated, the effective compensating control is to shrink the local-app attack surface: enforce App Store-only installation and block sideloading or unvetted enterprise/developer provisioning via MDM restrictions (trade-off: legitimate internal or test apps must be re-provisioned through approved channels), remove untrusted configuration profiles and enterprise certificates (trade-off: users lose any workflows that depended on them), and restrict high-value protected data - for example tighten app access to Photos, Contacts, and Files through MDM privacy policy controls (trade-off: reduced user convenience and possible breakage of approved apps). Because the vector is local and requires an already-running app, network-level defenses such as firewalls or IDS provide no meaningful mitigation; prioritizing the OS update is the only complete fix, and no vendor workaround short of patching is identified in the available data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is classified as CWE-284 (Improper Access Control): Apple's fix notes improved validation of the caller's access, meaning a process running inside the app sandbox could satisfy an access check it should not have, and thereby reach protected user data managed by the platform's privacy and entitlement enforcement layer. Because the weakness sits in the caller-identity check rather than in a memory-safety bug, no memory corruption, code execution, or persistence primitive is implied; the exposure is limited to disclosure of data the app was never granted. The practical attack surface is therefore the app-distribution pipeline: a malicious or compromised app delivered through sideloading, enterprise/developer provisioning, or even a reviewed App Store/notarized binary is the delivery vehicle, and Apple's sandbox plus distribution controls are the main friction points. CPE data confirms the affected platforms as Apple iOS and iPadOS, Apple macOS, and Apple visionOS; the vulnerability is fully remediated by the iOS/iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Tahoe 26.7, and visionOS 27 releases referenced in Apple's advisories (support.apple.com/en-us/149034, 149035, 149038, 149042).
Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
A locally-running app (AV:L, PR:L) reliably bypasses access validation (AC:L) to read protected user data, giving high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (apple).
CVSS VectorVendor: apple
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
This issue was addressed with improved validation of the caller's access. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Tahoe 26.7, visionOS 27. An app may be able to access protected user data.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope
Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe
Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV
The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)
A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent
In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen
A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth
This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i
A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut
Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this
EUVD-2026-104704
GHSA-xr5p-5qfr-xq46
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB