Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Operate rogue AFP server
  2. Delivery
    Lure or redirect victim to mount share
  3. Exploit
    Victim's gvfsd-afp connects and issues read request
  4. Execution
    Server replies with oversized DSI length
  5. Persist
    Heap buffer overflow in reply handler
  6. Impact
    gvfsd-afp process crashes (DoS)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The victim must actively mount or browse an AFP share hosted by a malicious server - either by being social-engineered into connecting to a rogue address, or by an attacker performing DNS/DHCP spoofing to redirect a legitimate AFP hostname. The AFP backend (gvfs-backends) must be installed and the gvfsd-afp daemon must be running, which requires the AFP backend package to be present on the system. The flaw is triggered on the client side, so the attacker's only prerequisite is to control an AFP server that the victim connects to. Exploitation is limited by the UI:R requirement: automated, zero-interaction attacks against passive clients are not possible - a user action (mount, browse, or file manager navigation) is necessary. There is no authentication requirement on the attacker's side since they control the server. Impact is contained to the gvfsd-afp worker process crash; the host OS and other user sessions are unaffected.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) is well-calibrated for this issue. The network vector and low complexity reflect that a malicious server reachable over any network path can trigger the flaw. User interaction is required - a user must actively mount or connect to the rogue AFP share, which meaningfully limits opportunistic exploitation. Scope is unchanged, meaning the overflow is contained to the gvfsd-afp worker process; a crash does not escalate to host-level impact. There is no confirmed CISA KEV listing and no known public exploit code, making this a low-urgency issue for most environments. The absence of confidentiality and integrity impact confirms current understanding is DoS-only, though CWE-122 heap overflows carry a theoretical potential for code execution if memory layout conditions are favorable - however, the description characterizes the outcome as a crash, and no RCE has been reported. AFP connectivity is a non-default, deliberate configuration in RHEL environments; organizations not mounting AFP shares are not exposed. EPSS data was not provided; given no KEV and no POC, real-world exploitation probability is assessed as low.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker operates a rogue AFP server on a network reachable by target users (e.g., a shared LAN, a VPN, or via DNS/DHCP poisoning to redirect legitimate AFP hostnames). A user on an RHEL system opens a file manager or runs a mount command pointing at the malicious server; the gvfsd-afp daemon connects and issues a read request. The server replies with a DSI length field larger than the client's buffer, triggering a heap overflow that crashes the gvfsd-afp process, denying the user filesystem access for that share. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 01, 2026

Heap buffer overflow in the gvfs AFP (Apple Filing Protocol) backend allows a malicious AFP server to crash the gvfsd-afp process on connecting clients, resulting in denial of service. When a client mounts an AFP share, the DSI (Data Stream Interface) read path accepts a server-supplied length value without validating it against the pre-allocated reply buffer, enabling the server to write past buffer boundaries. This affects RHEL 6 through 10 and requires user interaction to mount a malicious share; no public exploit or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply the gvfs package update from Red Hat once released for the applicable RHEL major version; monitor https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84269 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2526784 for patch availability and exact fixed package versions, which are not confirmed in the current data. As an interim compensating control, prevent users from mounting AFP shares by restricting access to the gvfs-backends-afp package or disabling the AFP backend via system policy - this eliminates the attack surface entirely with no impact on workloads that do not use Apple file shares. Organizations should audit which systems have gvfsd-afp running and whether any AFP mounts are configured; environments with no AFP usage are not exposed. Network-level blocking of AFP traffic (TCP/548 and associated DSI ports) at perimeter or host firewalls can reduce exposure if package removal is not feasible, but this does not protect against malicious servers reachable over allowed network paths.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

gvfs is the GNOME virtual filesystem layer that provides userspace filesystem backends for applications, including an AFP backend for mounting Apple file shares. AFP communicates over TCP using the DSI (Data Stream Interface) framing protocol, in which a length field in the DSI header describes the payload size. CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow) applies here: the gvfsd-afp client allocates a fixed reply buffer sized to the client's own request, but when the server returns a DSI response with a larger length value, the code copies data into the undersized buffer without bounds checking. The root cause is missing server-response validation - the client trusts the server-supplied length unconditionally. The vulnerability is exercised entirely on the client side (the gvfsd-afp daemon), making the attacker's leverage the ability to operate a rogue AFP server. Affected CPE strings span cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6 through _10, indicating the vulnerability exists in the gvfs package as shipped across all current RHEL major versions.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network-reachable server controls the attack; user must initiate mount (UI:R); impact is process crash only, no confidentiality or integrity loss.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM
Red Hat 6.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw was found in the AFP backend in gvfs. When mounting a share, a malicious AFP server can cause the DSI read path to process a length that exceeds the size requested by the client. The function does not verify the server-provided length against the pre-sized reply buffer, causing the operation to access past the intended boundaries. This issue allows a malicious server to overflow a heap buffer and crash the gvfsd-afp process, resulting in a denial of service.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
GNOME/RHEL component, but AFP backend is niche usage
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor CIRCL VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy