Skip to main content

Guardium Data Protection CVE-2026-84230

| EUVDEUVD-2026-95327 MEDIUM
Race Condition (CWE-362)
2026-10-08 ibm GHSA-7qq4-26vr-6j5m
5.9
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach Guardium network service
  2. Delivery
    Send concurrent racing requests
  3. Exploit
    Trigger unsynchronized shared-map writes
  4. Execution
    Corrupt state / crash service
  5. Impact
    Denial of service

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Concurrency control, locking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to the Guardium Data Protection service and the ability to generate concurrent/parallel requests that race on the shared map; per CVSS PR:N/UI:N no authentication or user interaction is needed. The primary limiting factor is the non-deterministic race window inherent to CWE-362 - an attacker must reliably interleave unsynchronized writes, which reduces real-world reliability below what AC:L suggests. Impact is confined to availability (A:H only); no confidentiality or integrity effect. Affected version is 12.2.2, and a vendor patch is available, so patched or non-12.2.2 deployments are not exposed.

Impact

The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 7.5) describes a remote, unauthenticated, availability-only impact with no confidentiality or integrity loss. No EPSS score was supplied, the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced, so exploitation is characterized as 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' A key signal conflict exists: the root cause is a race condition (CWE-362) from concurrent unsynchronized writes to a shared map, yet the input rates AC:L - race conditions normally require winning a timing window, which argues for AC:H. This likely overstates the true ease of exploitation, so the effective risk is below the 7.5 label. There is no SSVC decision data, no EPSS, and no exploitation evidence, meaning this is a credible but unproven availability issue rather than a confirmed active-exploitation priority; prioritize patching for internet-reachable or multi-tenant Guardium instances, but it is not an emergency on the available signals.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker who can reach the Guardium Data Protection service sends a burst of concurrent requests that race to write to a shared in-memory map, triggering data corruption or an unhandled error that crashes or hangs the service and denies availability to legitimate monitoring. No authentication or user interaction is required per the CVSS vector, but reliable triggering depends on hitting the concurrency window. No public exploit code is referenced at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026

Denial of service in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to degrade availability by racing concurrent unsynchronized writes to a shared map. The supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 7.5) describes availability-only impact with no confidentiality or integrity loss; our assessment refines attack complexity to AC:H because the non-deterministic race window reduces reliability below AC:L. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and a vendor patch is available via IBM Support node 7288627, so patched or non-12.2.2 deployments are not exposed.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor patch available from IBM Support node 7288627. The provided data confirms patch availability from the vendor but does not specify an exact fixed version, so patched versions should be confirmed through IBM’s advisory. Until patching is complete, restrict network reachability to the Guardium Data Protection service to trusted sources and consider connection or request concurrency limits to reduce an attacker’s ability to generate interleaved writes; the trade-off is possible throttling of legitimate parallel operations. Monitor for service crashes, restarts, or unexplained availability loss. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis, but the unauthenticated PR:N/UI:N profile still warrants prompt patching or network segmentation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2

Affected Packages

euvd guardium_data_protection no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a race condition (CWE-362) in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2. Concurrent unsynchronized writes to a shared map can cause inconsistent internal state or service disruption, producing availability impact only (A:H with C:N and I:N). Exploitation requires network reachability to the Guardium Data Protection service and the ability to generate parallel requests that interleave on the shared map; the PR:N/UI:N vector means no authentication or user interaction is needed. The supplied CVSS vector uses AC:L, but our independent assessment refines this to AC:H because the non-deterministic race window makes reliable exploitation difficult, which is consistent with a DoS-only race condition. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:ibm:guardium_data_protection:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*.

Know when Guardium Data Protection gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY HIGH
NVD 5.9 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

Remote unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) but the race condition requires winning a timing window, so AC:H; availability-only impact gives A:H with C:N/I:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Oct 15, 2026 - 00:23 NVD
HIGH MEDIUM
CVSS changed
Oct 15, 2026 - 00:23 NVD
7.5 (HIGH) 5.9 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Oct 08, 2026 - 21:28 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionNVD

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to a race condition resulting from concurrent unsynchronized writes to a shared map.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 is affected by a high-severity denial-of-service vulnerability that unauthenticated remote attackers could exploit to degrade availability of the data security monitoring platform. If successful, this could impair security teams’ visibility into database activity, audit trails, and compliance monitoring, creating operational and regulatory risk until service is restored. Patch available per vendor advisory via IBM Support node 7288627; no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 79% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
specialized enterprise database security product, common but not ubiquitous
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Race conditions occur when multiple concurrent requests exploit the brief time gap between checking a condition and acting upon it (TOCTOU - Time of Check, Time of Use).

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-84064 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL comma

CVE-2026-84075 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass security restrictions in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 through the Chang

CVE-2026-84078 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 18

Missing authentication in the LoadBalancerServlet of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows unauthenticated, network-r

CVE-2026-81657 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a network attacker who can reach the app

CVE-2026-75875 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated path traversal in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 can be leveraged by remote attackers

CVE-2026-82340 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated insecure deserialization in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2

CVE-2026-82967 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Authentication bypass in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker evade the IP-based ac

CVE-2026-84249 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication on a critical management function in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 and 12.2.2 allows unauthen

CVE-2026-84272 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Missing authentication in the edge-controller component of IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 allows unauthent

CVE-2026-84082 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Unauthenticated SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 lets a remote attacker submit crafted input that is c

CVE-2026-82344 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

A heap-based buffer overflow in IBM Guardium Data Protection's S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly routine allows an u

CVE-2026-80441 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 18

Second-order SQL injection in IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to submit SQL

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy