Skip to main content

Windows DirectComposition CVE-2026-83896

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99409 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-244q-pxwp-fwfm
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local low-privileged execution
  2. Delivery
    Invoke crafted Direct Composition calls
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap buffer overflow
  4. Execution
    Corrupt privileged memory structures
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to already have local, authenticated low-privilege code execution on the target Windows system (CVSS PR:L, AV:L); it cannot be triggered remotely or by an unauthenticated actor. Exploitation targets the Windows Direct Composition component, which is present by default across the affected Windows 10, Windows 11 (through 26H2/26H1), and Windows Server 2016-2025 builds, so no special feature toggle or non-default configuration is needed - the limiting factor is purely the need for a pre-existing local foothold. No user interaction is required (UI:N). The practical mitigation is applying the vendor-fixed build (e.g. Windows 11 24H2 >=10.0.26100.9711) and restricting local/standard-user access.

Impact

This is a credible but not emergency-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes local, low-complexity exploitation by an already-authenticated low-privilege user, yielding total compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H) - consistent with a classic Windows kernel/graphics-subsystem elevation-of-privilege used as the second stage after initial access. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a measured posture: Exploitation=none (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable=no (requires local foothold, not mass-scannable), but Technical Impact=total. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified, so the signals are internally consistent rather than conflicting: high technical impact paired with low current exploitation likelihood. EPSS was not provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation scoring cannot be factored in - this is a data gap, not a low score. The vulnerability was reported through Microsoft's own security process (secure@microsoft.com) and a patch is available, indicating coordinated disclosure rather than active in-the-wild discovery. Net assessment: patch on a normal prioritized cadence (it is a strong privilege-escalation primitive on a near-universal platform), but it is not a drop-everything remote-takeover issue.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host - for example via phishing, a malicious document, or a compromised standard user account - runs a crafted program that drives the Direct Composition component to overflow a heap buffer (CWE-122), corrupting kernel/privileged memory to elevate to SYSTEM. No user interaction is required once the attacker is on the box, but local access is a prerequisite. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows DirectComposition (CWE-122 heap-based buffer overflow) allows an attacker who already holds low-privilege code execution on a target host to corrupt heap memory inside the composition subsystem and elevate to a higher integrity level, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (CVSS 7.8, AV:L/PR:L/UI:N). DirectComposition is present by default across the affected Windows 10 builds 1607 through 22H2, Windows 11 23H2 through 26H2/26H1, and Windows Server 2016 through 2025, so no special feature enablement is needed - the only prerequisite is a pre-existing local, authenticated foothold with no user interaction required. Microsoft has published fixes that raise each affected branch to its patched build, and CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as none, with no public exploit identified at time of analysis; this is a credible but not emergency-tier priority relative to remotely reachable or actively exploited Windows flaws.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-83896 via the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83896, which is the vendor-released patch; confirm each host has moved to the fixed build for its branch, specifically Windows 10 1607 >= 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809 >= 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 >= 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 >= 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 >= 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 11 25H2 >= 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 >= 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 26H2 >= 10.0.26300.9711, Windows Server 2016 >= 10.0.14393.9612, Windows Server 2019 >= 10.0.17763.9376, Windows Server 2022 >= 10.0.20348.5761, and Windows Server 2025 >= 10.0.26100.33650. Because exploitation requires an existing local low-privilege foothold (AV:L/PR:L) and no public exploit is known, patch prioritization can follow standard local-EoP sequencing, but treat any host where unprivileged or untrusted users can run code - shared terminal servers, jump hosts, VDI pools, build agents, and multi-user workstations - as higher risk. Until patching completes, compensating controls that reduce the attack surface are to restrict interactive and batch logon on sensitive hosts to trusted accounts, remove or tightly scope local administrator membership and standard-user code-execution paths, and enforce application control (WDAC or AppLocker) to limit which binaries can execute in user context; the trade-off is that these controls break legitimate developer and administrative workflows and application-control policies require careful allow-listing or they cause operational outages. Note that disabling DirectComposition or the Desktop Window Manager is not a supported or practical mitigation on modern Windows and would break the shell and graphical applications, so it should not be attempted; rely on the vendor update plus least-privilege and application-control hardening, and monitor for local privilege-escalation behavior such as unexpected token manipulation or elevation from low-integrity processes.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 16 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Windows DirectComposition is the desktop composition and window-rendering layer that sits alongside the Desktop Window Manager and brokers high-performance bitmap, visual, and animation surfaces for applications. The defect is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122): a write operation into a heap-allocated buffer in the DirectComposition component is not correctly bounds-checked, so a caller able to reach the vulnerable code path with crafted input can overrun adjacent heap metadata and heap-allocated objects. Because the overflow occurs inside a component that runs with elevated privileges while being reachable from ordinary user-mode APIs, controlled heap corruption becomes a privilege-escalation primitive rather than merely a crash. The relevant mitigations that raise exploitation cost are modern Windows heap hardening (segment heap, safe unlinking, allocation metadata integrity checks) and control-flow protections; since the SSVC vector rates the technical impact as total, a successful exploit is expected to yield full compromise of the process context the corrupted data is consumed in. The affected builds span the 10.0.14393 (Server 2016/10 1607), 10.0.17763 (Server 2019/10 1809), 10.0.19044/19045 (10 21H2-22H2), 10.0.20348 (Server 2022), 10.0.22631 (11 23H2), 10.0.26100 (11 24H2, Server 2025), 10.0.26200 (11 25H2), 10.0.28000 (11 26H1), and 10.0.26300 (11 26H2) servicing lines, confirming this is a broadly shared component rather than an isolated feature.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local privilege escalation requiring a low-privileged foothold (AV:L, PR:L), no user interaction, low complexity, and total host compromise yields C:H/I:H/A:H at unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Direct Composition allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows DirectComposition contains a high-severity local privilege escalation vulnerability that could let an authenticated attacker with an existing low-privilege foothold gain elevated system rights on affected Windows hosts. Because the component is present by default across Windows 10 builds 1607 through 22H2, Windows 11 23H2 through 26H2/26H1, and Windows Server 2016 through 2025, unpatched endpoints and servers remain at risk after any initial compromise. CISA records no active exploitation and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so this is a high-priority patching issue rather than an emergency-tier remote threat.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 72% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
core Windows client and server component, deployed across most enterprise environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation More Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy