Skip to main content

Windows Win32K CVE-2026-83866

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99399 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-mfc9-f34v-g35g
7.0
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local session
  2. Delivery
    Execute crafted Win32K-triggering binary
  3. Exploit
    Win race to trigger use-after-free
  4. Execution
    Corrupt kernel object and hijack execution
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold a local, authenticated low-privileged account on the target host (PR:L, AV:L) and to execute code locally against the Win32K subsystem - there is no remote or network-triggerable path. The key LIMITING factor is the high attack complexity (AC:H): the use-after-free depends on winning a timing/race window in kernel object lifetime, so exploitation is not reliably repeatable and is not automatable (SSVC Automatable: no). No user interaction is required (UI:N). The flaw affects default configurations of supported Windows client and server editions (Windows 10 1607-22H2, Windows 11 23H2-26H2, Server 2016-2025) below the patched builds listed in EUVD-2026-99399; applying the vendor update removes the condition.

Impact

Signals here are largely concordant and point to a genuine but not top-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U) describes a local attack requiring an already-authenticated low-privileged foothold and a high-complexity trigger - consistent with a Win32K use-after-free (CWE-416) that must win a race or hit a specific timing window to be exploited reliably. Impact is total (C:H/I:H/A:H), and CISA's SSVC framework agrees (Technical Impact: total), which is typical for a kernel-mode EoP yielding SYSTEM. However, exploitation signals are low: SSVC Exploitation is 'none' (no observed exploitation), the input provides no KEV listing and no POC, so the status is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. No EPSS score was supplied, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified - a missing signal, not a low one. SSVC Automatable: no aligns with AC:H, indicating this cannot be reliably mass-exploited. Net: a real, patch-now-in-normal-cycle local EoP (kernel UAF, full SYSTEM potential) rather than an emergency; its value to attackers is as a post-compromise privilege-escalation link, not an initial-access or wormable threat.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged authenticated session on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a web-shell, or stolen credentials) runs a crafted program that triggers the Win32K use-after-free, winning the required race condition to corrupt kernel memory and elevate to SYSTEM. No user interaction is needed, but local code execution and the high-complexity timing requirement (AC:H) make reliable exploitation non-trivial. No public exploit code was identified at the time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows Win32K allows an attacker who already holds a low-privileged local account to corrupt kernel memory and elevate to SYSTEM-level rights via a use-after-free condition (CWE-416). Exploitation is confined to the local host (AV:L, PR:L) and is gated by high attack complexity (AC:H) because the attacker must win a timing window in kernel object lifetime management; no user interaction is required and the flaw affects default configurations of Windows 10 1607 through 22H2, Windows 11 23H2 through 26H2, and Windows Server 2016 through 2025 below the patched builds listed in EUVD-2026-99399. There is no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV is not present) and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis; CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as none and automatable as no, though technical impact is total once code execution is achieved. Microsoft has released fixes, and Microsoft product versions with the vendor update applied are not affected.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes for this issue (Patch status: available from vendor), and the fixed servicing baselines per EUVD-2026-99399 are 10.0.14393.9612 (Windows 10 1607 / Server 2016 and Server Core), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809 / Server 2019 and Server Core), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2 and 22H2), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025 and Server Core), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2), and 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1); install the corresponding Microsoft cumulative update referenced in the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83866 and confirm the resulting build number with 'winver' or 'Get-ComputerInfo'. Because the flaw lives in the core Win32K kernel component, there is no supported way to disable or unload the vulnerable code path without breaking the Windows graphical stack, so workarounds are inherently limited and carry real trade-offs: the most practical compensating controls are strict least-privilege hygiene to deny unprivileged interactive logons on sensitive servers (trade-off: reduced administrative flexibility and possible operational friction), removal or tight restriction of interactive/RDP access for standard users on high-value hosts (trade-off: blocks legitimate interactive use cases), and endpoint detection tuning for local kernel exploitation behavior such as unusual win32k.sys/win32kbase.sys memory corruption or unexpected SYSTEM token creation (trade-off: detection is post-hoc and the high attack complexity means attempts may be noisy but successful exploitation is hard to catch pre-execution). Prioritize patching on multi-user systems such as Remote Desktop Services hosts and terminal servers, where a low-privileged local account is easiest to obtain, and note that exploitation does not require user interaction or network reachability, so perimeter controls do not reduce risk.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 16 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Win32K is the kernel-mode component of the Windows subsystem that implements the window manager, GDI graphics primitives, and the user-mode/kernel transition stubs exposed through win32k.sys, win32kbase.sys, and win32kfull.sys. The vulnerability is a use-after-free (CWE-416): a kernel object - most plausibly a GDI or user object whose handle and lifetime are managed by the Win32K object manager - can be freed while a stale reference to it is still reachable, so a subsequent operation on that dangling pointer writes to or reads from memory that has been reallocated for another purpose. Because Win32K runs in kernel mode with SYSTEM privileges, converting this corruption into controlled execution yields a full privilege boundary crossing. The high attack complexity (AC:H) reflects the need to synchronize object destruction with the stale-reference path to win the race, which is why SSVC marks the issue non-automatable and exploitation is not reliable or repeatable. The CVSS vector AV:L/PR:L/UI:N/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms that a locally authenticated low-privileged user is both required and sufficient as a starting position, and that successful exploitation compromises confidentiality, integrity, and availability completely within the security scope. The CPE/version data ties the flaw to specific Windows build baselines: 10.0.14393 (Server 2016/Windows 10 1607), 10.0.17763 (Server 2019/Windows 10 1809), 10.0.19044 (Windows 10 21H2), 10.0.19045 (Windows 10 22H2), 10.0.20348 (Server 2022), 10.0.22631 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100 (Server 2025, Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26200 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.26300 (Windows 11 26H2), and 10.0.28000 (Windows 11 26H1), indicating the defect is present across the entire supported Windows servicing tree rather than in an isolated component or add-on.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local kernel UAF needing an existing low-priv session (AV:L, PR:L) and a race window (AC:H); successful EoP to SYSTEM yields full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows contains a high-severity local privilege escalation vulnerability that could allow an attacker with basic user access to gain full system control. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the widespread use of affected Windows versions across enterprise environments means unpatched systems pose a significant risk of insider threats or compromised accounts being leveraged for deeper network penetration. Leadership should prioritize patching to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data and potential operational disruption.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Windows kernel component present across all supported Windows/Server editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy