Skip to main content

Blaze CVE-2026-73494

| EUVDEUVD-2026-77697 HIGH
HTTP Request/Response Smuggling (CWE-444)
2026-09-14 GitHub_M GHSA-mhvj-jhpq-885v
7.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: GitHub_M
View

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service HTTP request consistency
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 15, 2026

HTTP/1.1 request smuggling in http4s blaze allows a remote client to desynchronize message boundaries between blaze's hand-written Java wire parser and a fronting proxy, enabling front-end authorization bypass, response-queue poisoning on pooled backend connections, or cache poisoning. All deployments of blaze prior to 0.23.18, and the 1.0.0 milestone line from 1.0.0-M1 through 1.0.0-M41, are affected via five independent parser laxities that are reachable from a default BlazeServerBuilder with no non-default configuration. Exploitation is not confirmed in the wild and no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis; CISA SSVC records exploitation as none and automatable as no, and no EPSS score was supplied with the source data.

Affected VersionsENISA

http4s-blaze-server_2.13 < 0.23.18
blaze-http_3 1.0.0-M1, < 1.0.0-M42
blaze-http_2.13 1.0.0-M1, < 1.0.0-M42
blaze 1.0.0-M1, < 1.0.0-M42
blaze-http_3 < 0.23.18
blaze < 0.23.18
blaze-http_2.13 < 0.23.18

Affected Packages

maven org.http4s:blaze-http_2.13 fix: 0.23.18, 1.0.0-M42
maven org.http4s:blaze-http_3 fix: 0.23.18, 1.0.0-M42
maven org.http4s:http4s-blaze-server_2.13 fix: 0.23.18
euvd blaze fix: 0.23.18
euvd blaze_1_0_0_m1 fix: 1.0.0-M42
euvd blaze_http_2_13 fix: 0.23.18
euvd blaze_http_2_13_1_0_0_m1 fix: 1.0.0-M42
euvd blaze_http_3 fix: 0.23.18
euvd blaze_http_3_1_0_0_m1 fix: 1.0.0-M42
euvd http4s_blaze_server_2_13 fix: 0.23.18

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 10 packages in maven, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Know when Blaze gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (GitHub_M) PRIMARY 7.4 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

blaze is a Scala library for building asynchronous pipelines, with a focus on network IO. Prior to 0.23.18 and from 1.0.0-M1 until 1.0.0-M42, five HTTP/1.1 conformance laxities in the hand-written Java parser under http/src/main/java/org/http4s/blaze/http/parser/ can cause blaze to derive a different request boundary than a stricter fronting intermediary. A default BlazeServerBuilder accepts invalid or valueless header field names that violate tchar syntax, obsolete folded field lines (obs-fold), unsupported Transfer-Encoding values, duplicate Content-Length fields, and requests containing both Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length. If a lenient or legacy proxy forwards the malformed bytes but interprets them differently, the disagreement can permit front-end authorization bypass, response-queue poisoning on pooled backend connections, or cache poisoning. Exploitation requires a pair of disagreeing parsers; no non-default blaze configuration is required. The affected checks are enforced in BodyAndHeaderParser and Http1ServerParser. This issue is fixed in versions 0.23.18 and 1.0.0-M42.

Blast Radius

ecosystem impact
† from your stack dependencies † transitive graph · vuln.today resolves 4-path depth
  • 10 maven packages depend on org.http4s:http4s-blaze-server_2.13 (4 direct, 6 indirect)

Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 0.23.18.

Technical POC Analysis

CWE-444 (Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests / HTTP Request Smuggling).

Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 69% exploitable
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

37
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +37
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

HTTP request smuggling exploits inconsistencies in how front-end and back-end servers parse HTTP message boundaries.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy