Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local session
  2. Delivery
    Interact with RASMAN service
  3. Exploit
    Send heap overflow payload
  4. Execution
    Overwrite heap control structures
  5. Impact
    Execute code at elevated privilege

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated local session with at least low-privilege access to the target Windows system - this is the primary limiting factor. The CVSS vector (AV:L/PR:L) confirms local access and an authenticated account are prerequisites; unauthenticated remote exploitation is not possible. No special configuration, non-default feature, or specific runtime state is described as required beyond the presence of the RASMAN service, which is active by default on all affected Windows versions. Exploitation is constrained to local attack surface: attackers must already be present on the machine (physically, via RDP, via lateral movement, or through a lower-privileged initial compromise). The lack of required user interaction (UI:N) means no secondary victim action is needed once the attacker has a local session.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) accurately characterizes this as a local privilege escalation requiring only a low-privileged authenticated session - no remote access, no social engineering, and no configuration preconditions are stated. The low attack complexity (AC:L) and absence of user interaction (UI:N) mean that once an attacker holds any local account, exploitation is straightforward. The scope is unchanged (S:U), but C:H/I:H/A:H indicates full system compromise within the affected process context, likely SYSTEM or network service. The breadth of affected versions - 19 distinct Windows builds from Server 2012 to Windows 11 26H1 - dramatically expands the real-world attack surface, especially in environments with shared workstations, multi-user servers, or post-initial-compromise lateral movement scenarios. No EPSS data or KEV listing is provided, and no POC is confirmed, which lowers immediate opportunistic exploitation risk; however, the simplicity of the trigger (AC:L) means reliable exploit development is plausible. This vulnerability is most impactful in environments where untrusted local users exist (RDS servers, VDI, shared endpoints) or as a privilege escalation step following initial foothold.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained a low-privileged local account - through phishing, credential reuse, or initial exploitation of another vulnerability - connects to or interacts with the RASMAN service and sends crafted input that triggers the heap buffer overflow. With no user interaction required and low attack complexity, the attacker overwrites heap control structures to redirect execution, achieving code execution in the context of the RASMAN service process (typically running at elevated privilege), resulting in full local privilege escalation. No public proof-of-concept is confirmed at time of analysis, but the AC:L rating suggests reliable exploit development is feasible.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 09, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Remote Access Connection Manager (RASMAN) service enables local code execution with full system impact on unpatched Windows 10, 11, and Server 2012-2025 systems. Any authenticated local user with low privileges can trigger the CWE-122 overflow with no user interaction, achieving high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - characteristic of a local privilege escalation to SYSTEM or service-level code execution. No active exploitation (KEV) or public proof-of-concept is confirmed at time of analysis; vendor patch is available via Microsoft Update.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released patches via Windows Update or WSUS targeting the fixed build for each affected version: Windows 10 1809/Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9245, Windows 10 21H2 to 10.0.19044.7725, Windows 10 22H2 to 10.0.19045.7725, Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7582, Windows 11 24H2/Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.9445 (or 10.0.26100.33438 for Server 2025 where applicable), Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.2954, Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9512, Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5622, Server 2012/2012R2 to the respective 6.x builds noted above. Consult https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-71343 for the exact KB articles per version. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not feasible, restrict local interactive logon rights to the minimal required set via Group Policy (Deny log on locally / Deny log on through Remote Desktop Services) and enforce least-privilege principles to reduce the pool of accounts capable of triggering the flaw. Disabling RASMAN entirely is not a viable workaround on systems actively using VPN or dial-up functionality, as it would break Remote Access and VPN connectivity.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9445
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7725
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5622
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26349
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23397
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26349
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7725
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7582
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2954
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9445
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23397
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7725
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7725
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7582
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9445
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9445
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2954
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26349
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23397
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23397
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26349
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5622
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33438
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33438

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 19 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Windows Remote Access Connection Manager (RASMAN, rasman.dll/svchost.exe) is a built-in Windows service responsible for managing dial-up and VPN connection state across the system. A CWE-122 heap-based buffer overflow arises when attacker-controlled input causes a write operation to exceed the bounds of a heap-allocated buffer, potentially overwriting adjacent heap metadata, vtable pointers, or control structures. This class of bug is commonly leveraged to redirect execution into attacker-controlled code within the service's privilege context. RASMAN typically runs as a network service or SYSTEM account, so exploitation translates directly to privilege escalation. The flaw affects a broad range of builds spanning from Windows Server 2012 (build 6.2.9200) through Windows 11 26H1 (build 10.0.28000) and Windows Server 2025, indicating the vulnerable code path has persisted across many Windows release cycles.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local attack requiring low-privilege account; AC:L because no race or special config needed; full C/I/A from code execution in elevated service context.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:35 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:20 nvd
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Windows Remote Access Connection Manager (RASMAN) service contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability affecting Windows 10, 11, and Server editions 2012-2025, allowing any authenticated local user to achieve SYSTEM-level access with no user interaction. This impacts every Windows-based system in your organization and poses significant risk from insider threats and compromised workstations gaining administrative control.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 72% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows installed on virtually all enterprise endpoints and servers
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation More Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy