Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain high-privileged local access to Windows host
-
ExploitTarget Windows Hello authorization check
-
ExecutionExploit incorrect authorization (CWE-863) to bypass security feature
-
ImpactAccess protected data behind Hello
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess high local privileges (PR:H) on the targeted Windows system and to interact with the Windows Hello authentication/authorization feature; this is a local-only vector (AV:L) with no user interaction (UI:N) and low attack complexity (AC:L). Limiting factors: the attacker must have pre-existing elevated access to the host, the target must have Windows Hello in use as the security feature being bypassed, and the system must be running an unpatched affected build (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 below 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 10 22H2 below 10.0.19044.7807, among other listed ranges). No remote or unauthenticated path exists per the CVSS vector. |
| Impact | This is a genuine-but-low-priority local security-feature bypass. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 4.4 Medium) is the dominant and only quantitative signal available: exploitation is strictly local (AV:L) and requires an attacker who already holds high privileges on the machine (PR:H), which substantially limits the threat population. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, KEV listing, or POC evidence was provided in the input. Per the precision rules there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and this is NOT CISA KEV-listed, so there is no indication of active exploitation. One internal tension to verify: the vector assigns C:H (high confidentiality impact) yet I:N/A:N, which is somewhat unusual for an 'incorrect authorization / security feature bypass' of Windows Hello - a biometric/authentication gate bypass would more intuitively affect integrity of the auth decision; the vendor's chosen C:H likely reflects access to protected/credential data behind Hello, but this should be confirmed against the Microsoft MSRC advisory. Overall: real but requires an already-privileged local attacker, so prioritize normal patch cadence rather than emergency response. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has high-privileged local access to a Windows endpoint abuses an incorrect authorization check in Windows Hello to bypass the intended security feature and access data or functionality that Hello was meant to gate. No user interaction is required, but because exploitation is local and demands existing elevated privileges, it functions as a post-compromise capability rather than an initial-access vector. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Incorrect authorization in Windows Hello allows a locally positioned attacker who already holds high privileges on the host (CVSS PR:H) to bypass the Windows Hello security feature and read data that the feature is meant to protect, resulting in a confidentiality-only impact (C:H, I:N, A:N) and a base score of 4.4. The flaw is local-only (AV:L), low complexity (AC:L), and requires no user interaction (UI:N), so it presupposes pre-existing elevated access to the machine and that Windows Hello is actually in use as the bypassed control; unpatched Windows 10 21H2/22H2 and Windows 11 23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1 and 26H2 builds are affected. There is no CISA KEV entry and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and Microsoft has published vendor patches that resolve the affected builds via the MSRC update guide.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patches are available: apply the current Microsoft cumulative update for the applicable baseline so the system reaches or exceeds Windows 10 21H2/22H2 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 11 25H2 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 10.0.28000.3231, or Windows 11 26H2 10.0.26300.9711, and verify the installed build number matches the advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70280 rather than the EUVD range where the two disagree (the Windows 10 22H2 fix build is the clearest point of confusion). Because exploitation requires the attacker to already hold high local privileges, the most effective compensating controls are privilege-side rather than feature-side: eliminate standing local administrator rights, enforce just-in-time/privileged-access-workstation elevation, and audit deployments that use shared or over-privileged local accounts, since any local admin can satisfy the PR:H prerequisite. Restricting or disabling the Windows Hello credential provider would remove the bypass surface but breaks passwordless sign-in, biometric/PIN logon and Windows Hello for Business conditional-access flows and forces a fallback to password authentication, which is a materially worse security trade-off and should only be considered on isolated, high-value hosts until patching completes; monitoring for anomalous access to Hello credential/container state by elevated processes is a useful detective control, though it does not prevent the bypass.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 7 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Windows Hello is Microsoft's passwordless authentication framework (convenience PIN, fingerprint/face biometrics, and Windows Hello for Business) whose credentials are protected by TPM-backed keys and used for local sign-in, credential provider operations, and conditional-access scenarios. The root cause class here is CWE-863, Incorrect Authorization: the affected component fails to correctly verify that the calling context is permitted to perform an operation against the Windows Hello credential or session state, so a caller that already satisfies the high-privilege prerequisite (PR:H in the CVSS vector) can reach a protected operation that should have been denied. Because the assessed impact is limited to confidentiality (C:H with I:N/A:N), the practical outcome is disclosure of Hello-protected data or session content rather than code execution, privilege escalation, or tampering. The local attack vector (AV:L), low attack complexity and absence of user interaction mean the technical bar is a suitably privileged local execution context on an unpatched build, not a remotely reachable flaw; the EUVD affected-version ranges enumerate the specific Windows servicing baselines concerned (Windows 10 21H2/22H2, Windows 11 23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1 and 26H2), and no alternate remote or unauthenticated path is described in the available intelligence.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description states local security-feature bypass requiring an authorized attacker, so AV:L and PR:H; incorrect authorization yields confidentiality exposure (C:H) without integrity or availability loss.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionNVD
Incorrect authorization in Windows Hello allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-99266
GHSA-2xq4-pwpf-h7cw
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB