Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to guest VM as low-privileged user
  2. Exploit
    Invoke crafted Hyper-V operation
  3. Execution
    Trigger null pointer dereference in host component
  4. Impact
    Crash host, denying service to all VMs

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Null pointer safety, defensive checks
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the Hyper-V role to be enabled on the host and the attacker to hold low-privileged authenticated access within a guest VM (PR:L) with local access to the host/hypervisor interface (AV:L) - it is not remotely reachable over a network. The impact is limited to availability (DoS); there is no confidentiality or integrity exposure. Limiting factors: hosts not running the Hyper-V role are unaffected, and the realistic threat is concentrated in multi-tenant or shared-virtualization deployments where untrusted parties control guest VMs - a single-tenant host where all guests are trusted faces negligible practical risk. No user interaction is required (UI:N), and no public exploit code has been identified.

Impact

This is a genuinely moderate, not high, priority issue despite the 6.5 CVSS. All signals align toward low real-world urgency: the CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H) describes a locally-exploitable, authenticated denial-of-service with no confidentiality or integrity impact - the 6.5 score is inflated only by the scope change (S:C), reflecting that a Hyper-V guest can crash the host. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces low urgency: Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=partial. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so there is no evidence of active exploitation. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. The signals are consistent rather than conflicting: a local, authenticated, availability-only flaw in a virtualization component with no known exploitation. The one meaningful amplifier is the scope change - a malicious or compromised guest VM can deny service to the host and therefore to co-tenant VMs, which matters in multi-tenant or consolidated virtualization environments. Overall this is a patch-in-normal-cycle issue, prioritized higher only where Hyper-V hosts carry untrusted or multi-tenant guests.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with low-privileged authenticated access inside a Hyper-V guest VM (AV:L, PR:L) issues a crafted operation that triggers a null pointer dereference (CWE-476) in the Hyper-V component. Because the scope changes (S:C), the resulting crash denies service beyond the guest, taking down the host and thereby other co-located VMs. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and no user interaction is required (UI:N).

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Denial of service in Microsoft Windows Hyper-V allows an attacker with low-privileged local access inside a guest virtual machine to trigger a null pointer dereference in the hypervisor, crashing the host and every VM it runs. Affected platforms are Windows 10 (1607 through 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2 through 26H2) and Windows Server 2016 through 2025, including Server Core installations, but only where the Hyper-V role is enabled and untrusted users can control guest VMs. Microsoft has released a vendor patch and no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, so the practical risk is moderate and concentrated in multi-tenant or shared-virtualization deployments rather than in general single-tenant environments.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes, so update each affected host to at least the build listed for its branch - Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711, Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761, and Windows Server 2025 (including Server Core) to 10.0.26100.33650 - following https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70248, and note that hypervisor fixes typically require a host reboot before they take effect. Because the fault lies in the hypervisor itself, guest-side hardening cannot reliably prevent it; the most effective compensating control where virtualization is not required is to remove the Hyper-V role entirely (with the side effect of breaking VMs, WSL2, Windows Sandbox, containers, and VBS/HVCI-based protections such as Credential Guard), and where Hyper-V must stay enabled, restrict guest VM tenancy to trusted workloads and administrators so the required low-privileged (PR:L) guest access is not available to untrusted parties. Tightening who holds local logon and management rights on guest VMs raises the bar for the PR:L prerequisite without breaking virtualization, whereas perimeter firewalling is irrelevant here because the flaw is not reachable over the network (AV:L). Monitor hosts for unexpected bugchecks and simultaneous outages of multiple VMs as a detection signal, since successful exploitation manifests as an availability loss rather than data theft.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 16 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The defect is a CWE-476 null pointer dereference inside the Windows Hyper-V hypervisor, the Type-1 virtualization layer that mediates hardware access for guest partitions. Because the faulting dereference occurs in the hypervisor rather than inside a guest operating system, the assessed CVSS vector carries Scope:Changed (S:C), meaning a low-privileged actor confined to a guest can affect components outside its own security authority, specifically the host kernel and sibling VMs. Exploitation requires the Hyper-V role to be present on the target (AV:L) plus low-privileged authenticated access inside a guest partition (PR:L), with no user interaction (UI:N); the impact is confined to availability (C:N/I:N/A:H), so confidentiality and integrity are untouched and the worst realistic outcome is a host bugcheck or hang that takes down all hosted workloads. CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as none, automation as not automatable and technical impact as partial, which matches the local-only, non-automatable nature of the bug. No CPE strings were supplied in the source data; EUVD instead enumerates the vulnerable branches by build number, spanning 10.0.14393 (Windows Server 2016 / Windows 10 1607) through 10.0.26300 (Windows 11 26H2).

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Guest-local authenticated trigger gives AV:L/PR:L/AC:L; the guest-to-host crash justifies S:C with A:H and no C/I impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Null pointer dereference in Windows Hyper-V allows an authorized attacker to deny service locally.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 68% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Hyper-V is Microsoft's built-in hypervisor, widely deployed in Windows Server environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A null pointer dereference occurs when a program attempts to access memory through a pointer that has been set to NULL (address 0x0).

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

CVE-2026-96951 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 13

Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then

CVE-2025-24054 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 11

External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy