Skip to main content

Windows GDI CVE-2026-69884

| EUVDEUVD-2026-100115 HIGH
Buffer Over-read (CWE-126)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-j979-vpmf-8w6v
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local access
  2. Delivery
    Invoke crafted GDI operation
  3. Exploit
    Trigger buffer over-read in Windows GDI
  4. Execution
    Corrupt/leak privileged kernel memory
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer over-read prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess authenticated, low-privileged local access to the target Windows host (PR:L, AV:L) - this is a post-compromise privilege-escalation flaw, not a remotely reachable one. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no special or non-default configuration is indicated by the description, which affects the default Windows GDI graphics component present across all listed client and server editions (including Server Core installations). The primary limiting factor is the local-access prerequisite: an attacker with no foothold cannot reach this vulnerability, and SSVC Automatable=no indicates it is not amenable to automated mass exploitation.

Impact

This is a credible but not emergency-level priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) describes a local privilege-escalation flaw: the attacker must already have low-privilege authenticated access (PR:L) and local presence on the host (AV:L), but no user interaction and low attack complexity are required once that foothold exists. CISA's SSVC framework aligns with a measured posture: Exploitation=none (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable=no (consistent with a local EoP that cannot be mass-scanned/wormed), but Technical Impact=total (matching C:H/I:H/A:H and the SSVC 'total' rating). There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC referenced in the provided data, and no EPSS score was supplied, so there is no signal of active or imminent exploitation. The signals are therefore internally consistent rather than conflicting: high technical impact but constrained real-world reachability because it is local-only and requires prior authentication. Net assessment - a standard-cadence patch priority typical of monthly Windows GDI EoP fixes, valuable to attackers as a post-compromise escalation primitive but not a remote-unauthenticated internet-facing threat. Missing data: EPSS probability and any POC status are not provided and cannot be assumed.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing or a separate initial-access bug) invokes a crafted operation that triggers the buffer over-read in the GDI component, leveraging the out-of-bounds read to corrupt or disclose adjacent kernel/privileged memory and escalate to higher privileges. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and user interaction is not required (UI:N) once local access is held. Low attack complexity (AC:L) means a working exploit, once developed, would be reliable.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Microsoft Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) allows an authenticated, low-privileged attacker who already holds a foothold on a host to trigger a buffer over-read (CWE-126) and turn that memory-safety defect into higher privileges, carrying a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Every supported Windows client and server edition listed by the vendor is affected, including Server Core installations, but the vector requires the attacker to already have authenticated low-privileged local access (PR:L, AV:L), making this a post-compromise escalation flaw rather than a remotely reachable one, and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation:none and Automatable:no, and a vendor patch is available - collectively this is a credible but not emergency-level priority that should be handled in the normal monthly patch cycle.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patches are available: apply the current Windows cumulative security update for each affected build, which per the EUVD ranges raises clients and servers to 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2) or 10.0.26100.33650 (Windows Server 2025), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1), 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019), 10.0.14393.9612 (Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2) and 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012); consult https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69884 for the exact KB per edition, and note that out-of-support builds such as Server 2012/2012 R2 may require Extended Security Updates to obtain the fix. Because exploitation requires an already-authenticated local user (PR:L, AV:L), there is no network-facing control that eliminates the flaw; instead, shrink the post-compromise path - enforce least privilege so interactive users are not local administrators, restrict interactive/RDP logon on high-value servers to named administrators, and use WDAC/AppLocker in enforce mode to block untrusted binaries that would carry the over-read trigger, accepting the operational overhead of application allow-listing. Disabling GDI or its related graphics subsystems is not a viable workaround since it breaks the Windows shell, printing and most GUI applications, and Microsoft has not published a registry or feature-level mitigation for this issue; prioritize the patch on multi-user systems such as RDP hosts, VDI images and terminal servers where many low-privileged sessions share one kernel, and monitor for the local escalation pattern (unusual win32k/GDI object activity followed by a token or integrity-level change) as a detection backstop while patching rolls out.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

GDI is the long-standing Windows 2D graphics API that applications use to draw to screens, printers and memory bitmaps; much of its object management (device contexts, bitmaps, regions, brushes, fonts) is brokered into kernel-mode win32k components, which is why a memory-safety defect inside GDI can cross a security boundary and be escalated into elevated privileges. The root cause class here is CWE-126, Buffer Over-read: code reads past the end of a buffer that was allocated or validated on the assumption of different length or index bounds, so out-of-bounds adjacent memory is consumed as legitimate data. Over-reads are classically information-disclosure primitives (they can leak neighbouring heap contents, including pointers), but Microsoft's vector rates both confidentiality and integrity as High (C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating the read data is subsequently processed in a way that corrupts program state and can be steered toward code execution or privilege escalation. The CVSS vector PR:L/AV:L confirms the attacker must already be running as an authenticated low-privileged user on the target machine, and the absence of a changed-scope marker (S:U) plus SSVC Technical Impact:total indicates the escalation is contained within the affected Windows component but grants broad control once achieved. CISA's SSVC also rates Automatable:no, meaning the flaw is not readily packaged into automated, mass-exploitation tooling.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local post-authentication EoP so AV:L and PR:L; no user interaction (UI:N); low complexity (AC:L); SSVC 'total' technical impact supports C:H/I:H/A:H within an unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Buffer over-read in Windows GDI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege escalation flaw in Microsoft Windows' Graphics Device Interface (GDI) affects every supported Windows client and Server edition, including Server Core. Exploitation requires an attacker to already hold authenticated low-privileged access on a machine, meaning this is a post-compromise escalation risk rather than a remotely reachable one; a compromised laptop, VDI session, or server foothold could be leveraged to gain administrative control of that host. Leadership should care because this flaw can turn a minor single-host intrusion into full system takeover, but with no public exploit code identified and a vendor patch available, it is a routine patch-cycle priority rather than an emergency.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 74% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows GDI ships in every supported Windows client and server edition
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy