Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with low-privilege account
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted request to EFS service
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap buffer overflow (CWE-122)
  4. Execution
    Groom heap and control corruption
  5. Persist
    Execute code as SYSTEM
  6. Impact
    Elevate privileges on host

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated low-privilege account (PR:L) with network reach to the target's Encrypting File System (EFS) service; exploitation is limited by high attack complexity (AC:H), indicating a race condition or precise heap-grooming rather than a deterministic single-shot trigger. No user interaction is needed (UI:N). Affected systems are unpatched Windows builds below the fixed versions listed in EUVD-2026-73589 (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 <10.0.26100.9445, Server 2025 <10.0.26100.33438, Server 2012 <6.2.9200.26349); applying the Microsoft update removes the condition. There is no default-configuration unauthenticated remote path - a valid credential is a hard prerequisite.

Impact

This is a genuine but not top-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.5 (High), but the vector reflects meaningful friction: AV:N with AC:H (high attack complexity, likely requiring a race/heap-grooming or specific memory state), PR:L (an authenticated low-privilege account is needed), and UI:N. All three impact metrics are High (C:H/I:H/A:H), consistent with the SSVC 'Technical Impact: total' rating and the memory-corruption primitive of CWE-122. Real-world exploitation signals are LOW and internally consistent: EPSS is 0.57% (45th percentile), SSVC lists 'Exploitation: none' and 'Automatable: no', and there is no KEV listing and no public POC. The high CVSS is driven by total technical impact, not by ease or likelihood of exploitation - the AC:H and PR:L requirements plus 'not automatable' point to a targeted, skilled-attacker scenario rather than mass exploitation. A patch is available from Microsoft, which should be prioritized on a normal cadence rather than emergency-out-of-band. No signals conflict here; all sources agree this is a patch-in-cycle privilege-escalation bug, not an actively exploited emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged authenticated foothold sends specially crafted data to the Encrypting File System (EFS) service over the network, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow. By carefully controlling heap layout, they corrupt memory to gain code execution at elevated (SYSTEM-level) privilege. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified, and the high attack complexity (AC:H) means reliable exploitation would require significant skill and favorable memory conditions.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Sep 22, 2026

Privilege escalation on unpatched Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server systems is possible through a heap-based buffer overflow in the Encrypting File System (EFS), which a low-privileged authenticated account can reach over the network to gain SYSTEM-level code execution. Exploitation is constrained by high attack complexity (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), implying a race condition or precise heap grooming rather than a deterministic one-shot trigger, and no user interaction is required. There is no evidence of active exploitation and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; CISA SSVC records Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no', and EPSS is a low 0.57% (45th percentile) despite the total technical impact score. Microsoft has released fixes, so the residual risk is concentrated on systems that remain unpatched.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Sep 09, 2026 - 00:58 CVSS 7.1

Heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) service enables a low-privileged authenticated attacker to elevate privileges to a higher level over a network connection. The vulnerability (CWE-122) spans virtually the entire supported Windows ecosystem - from Windows 10 1607 through Windows 11 26H1 and Windows Server 2012 through Server 2025 - making it a broad enterprise patching obligation. Microsoft has released cumulative updates addressing the issue; no public exploit or CISA KEV entry has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes for all affected branches, and the required action is to apply the latest cumulative security update so each host reaches or exceeds its fixed build - Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016 at 10.0.14393.9512, Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019 at 10.0.17763.9245, Windows 10 21H2 at 10.0.19044.7725, Windows 10 22H2 at 10.0.19045.7725, Windows 11 23H2 at 10.0.22631.7582, Windows 11 24H2 and Server 2025 at 10.0.26100.9445 and 10.0.26100.33438 respectively, Windows 11 25H2 at 10.0.26200.9445, Windows 11 26H1 at 10.0.28000.2954, Server 2012 at 6.2.9200.26349, Server 2012 R2 at 6.3.9600.23397, and Server 2022 at 10.0.20348.5622; details and download links are in the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69688. Where patching cannot be completed immediately, compensating controls are limited because the vulnerable surface is a legitimate Windows feature: restrict network reach to the EFSRPC interface and the EFS service by firewalling SMB/named-pipe and RPC endpoints so only trusted management hosts can connect, with the trade-off that remote EFS administration and any remote encrypted-file operations stop working; remove or tightly scope EFS usage by disabling the Encrypting File System via Group Policy and revoking the 'Create a token object'/EFS-related user rights for non-administrative accounts, which prevents low-privilege users from exercising the code path but breaks file encryption for those users and can render existing encrypted files unreadable if the EFS certificate and key are also removed; and enforce least privilege so that low-privilege credentials cannot be used to reach the service, since PR:L is a hard prerequisite and an unauthenticated remote path does not exist. Monitoring for anomalous EFSRPC traffic and unexpected privilege transitions on endpoints and servers should be used alongside, not instead of, the Microsoft update.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9445
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26349
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9445
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7582
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7725
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2954
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5622
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23397
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26349
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7725
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23397
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7725
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7725
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7582
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9445
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9445
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2954
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26349
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23397
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23397
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26349
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5622
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33438
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33438

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 19 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-122 heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Encrypting File System, the component that provides per-file and per-folder encryption built on the Windows CryptoAPI and managed through the EFS service and the EFSRPC remote interface (MS-EFSR). A heap buffer is allocated without adequate bounds validation and an out-of-bounds write occurs, corrupting adjacent heap metadata or objects. The CVSS vector indicates network reachability (AV:N) but high attack complexity (AC:H) and a low-privilege authenticated prerequisite (PR:L), no user interaction (UI:N), and unchanged scope with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) - consistent with a controlled heap-corruption primitive that must be groomed reliably to reach SYSTEM. The CPE data and vendor tags enumerate a very broad install base, spanning Windows 10 1607, 1809, 21H2 and 22H2 (x86, x64, arm64), Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1, and Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025, meaning the vulnerable EFS code path has shipped across multiple servicing branches for over a decade. CISA's SSVC assessment confirms Technical Impact is 'total' while Exploitation and Automatable are both negative, so the bug is a serious escalation primitive but not self-propagating.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Network-reachable EFS service (AV:N) needs an authenticated low-priv account (PR:L) and difficult heap conditions (AC:H); successful overflow yields SYSTEM-level total impact (C/I/A:H).

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Analysis Updated
Sep 22, 2026 - 15:57 vuln.today
v2 - CVSS changed
CVSS changed
Sep 22, 2026 - 15:52 NVD
7.1 (HIGH) 7.5 (HIGH)
Patch available
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:35 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:19 nvd
HIGH 7.1

DescriptionNVD

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server systems are affected by a high-severity privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2026-69688) in the Encrypting File System (EFS) that allows an authenticated low-privileged attacker to gain SYSTEM-level code execution over the network. Although exploitation requires high attack complexity and no public exploit or active exploitation has been identified, unpatched systems remain at risk of full compromise, which could lead to data breaches, lateral movement, and operational disruptions. Leadership should prioritize patching to mitigate residual risk across the organization.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 55% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows OS and EFS component present across virtually all enterprise environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy