Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain low-privileged code execution in guest VM
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious hypercall or device emulation input
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap overflow in host Hyper-V component
  4. Execution
    Overwrite host heap metadata/function pointer
  5. Persist
    Execute arbitrary code at hypervisor privilege level
  6. Impact
    Full host system compromise and access to all co-hosted VMs

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The attacker must have low-privileged code execution inside a Windows Hyper-V guest virtual machine (PR:L per CVSS vector). The vulnerability is exploited locally - no network path to the target is required, as the attack surface is the hypervisor's guest-to-host interface. The Hyper-V role must be enabled and running on the host; Windows systems without Hyper-V active are not exposed. No user interaction on the host is required (UI:N). The scope change (S:C) indicates that successful exploitation crosses from the guest VM security boundary into the host. Exploitation is limited to authorized users who can run or interact with a guest VM on the affected host - pure external network attackers without prior guest-VM access cannot exploit this directly.

Impact

This is a high-priority vulnerability in enterprise and cloud environments. The CVSS 8.8 score (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects low local complexity with no interaction needed once inside a guest VM, and full host compromise on success. The scope-change and full C/I/A triad represent worst-case hypervisor impact - an attacker breaking out of a guest can read or destroy all other VMs, steal encryption keys or credentials stored on the host, pivot to the management network, and persist below the OS. In multi-tenant environments (shared Hyper-V hosts, Azure Stack, hosted VDI), a single compromised tenant VM could laterally compromise all co-hosted workloads. No EPSS score was provided in the input data, so exploitation probability cannot be quantitatively compared. No CISA KEV listing or public POC has been identified, which slightly reduces urgency for opportunistic attack scenarios, but the low exploitation complexity means that any threat actor capable of running guest code (e.g., via phishing, supply-chain compromise, or insider access) can weaponize this without sophisticated tooling. Organizations running shared Hyper-V hosts or using Hyper-V for security boundaries (e.g., DeviceGuard, Windows Sandbox, WSL2) should treat this as critical.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has gained low-privileged code execution inside a Hyper-V guest VM - for example, through a phishing compromise of a tenant workload - crafts a malicious hypercall or device emulation request that triggers the heap overflow in the host-side Hyper-V component. The overflow corrupts host heap structures, allowing the attacker to redirect execution flow to shellcode running at the hypervisor privilege level. From there, the attacker gains full control of the physical host, can read or modify memory of all other co-hosted VMs, and can establish persistence below the guest OS boundary. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, but the low attack complexity (AC:L) suggests this would not be unusually difficult to develop for a motivated, capable threat actor.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 09, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Hyper-V enables a low-privileged guest VM user to escape the hypervisor sandbox and execute arbitrary code on the host system. The CVSS scope-change metric (S:C) and C:H/I:H/A:H impact ratings confirm this is a full VM-escape class vulnerability, giving an attacker inside a guest complete control over the underlying Hyper-V host. Affected versions span Windows 10 1607 through Windows 11 25H2 and Windows Server 2012 through Server 2025; Microsoft has released patches via Windows Update. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply Microsoft's cumulative update immediately via Windows Update or WSUS/MECM. Target build numbers by platform are: Windows Server 2025 → 10.0.26100.33438; Windows Server 2022 → 10.0.20348.5622; Windows Server 2019 → 10.0.17763.9245; Windows Server 2016 → 10.0.14393.9512; Windows Server 2012 R2 → 6.3.9600.23397; Windows Server 2012 → 6.2.9200.26349; Windows 11 25H2 → 10.0.26200.9445; Windows 11 24H2 → 10.0.26100.9445; Windows 11 23H2 → 10.0.22631.7582; Windows 10 22H2 → 10.0.19045.7725; Windows 10 21H2 → 10.0.19044.7725; Windows 10 1809 → 10.0.17763.9245; Windows 10 1607 → 10.0.14393.9512. See https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69603 for the full patch manifest. If immediate patching of shared Hyper-V hosts is not feasible, consider restricting which users can run VMs on high-value hosts, segmenting multi-tenant Hyper-V fleets, and auditing guest VM access. Disabling the Hyper-V role entirely on hosts where it is not required eliminates exposure with no side effects on non-virtualization workloads.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9445
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9445
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23397
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23397
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7725
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5622
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7725
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26349
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26349
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7582
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7725
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7725
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7582
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9445
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9445
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26349
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23397
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23397
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26349
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5622
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33438
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33438

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 18 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Windows Hyper-V is Microsoft's Type-1/Type-2 hypervisor, built into Windows Server and Windows 10/11 client editions for hardware-level virtualization. CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow) indicates that a memory allocation in a Hyper-V hypervisor component can be overflowed by a controlled guest-side input, corrupting heap metadata or adjacent objects in the host process context. Because the hypervisor mediates all hardware access for guest VMs, memory corruption in Hyper-V's guest-facing interface can grant native code execution in the privileged host ring. The scope change in the CVSS vector (S:C) is the canonical signal that exploitation crosses a security boundary - here, from the isolated guest VM environment to the host hypervisor. Affected builds are confirmed across Server 2012 (6.2.x), Server 2012 R2 (6.3.x), Server 2016/2019/2022/2025 (10.0.14393.x-10.0.26100.x), and Windows 10/11 client editions running Hyper-V.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Local access with low privileges inside a guest VM required; scope changes to host hypervisor yielding full C/I/A impact on host.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:35 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:19 nvd
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Hyper-V allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Windows Hyper-V across versions 10 (1607-25H2) and Server 2012-2025 contains a heap-based buffer overflow enabling VM escape: any user with access to a guest virtual machine can escalate to full control of the underlying hypervisor host. Organizations running Hyper-V with multi-tenant workloads or untrusted guest VMs face immediate risk of host compromise and lateral movement across all hosted systems.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 76% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Hyper-V ships with all Windows Server SKUs and Windows 10/11 Pro/Enterprise
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy