Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as tenant with HelmRelease create rights
-
DeliverySubmit crafted Helm chart with cluster-scoped manifests
-
ExploitController renders templates under elevated ServiceAccount
-
ExecutionArbitrary resources applied cluster-wide
-
ImpactGrant self cluster-admin and compromise cluster
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service Proxy/intermediary controls
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated tenant identity (CVSS PR:L) that has been granted RBAC permission to create HelmRelease custom resources handled by the multicloud-operators-subscription HelmRelease controller in RHACM 2.x. The concrete prerequisite is this delegated HelmRelease-create capability combined with a deployment where that controller reconciles tenant-supplied charts using its own elevated ServiceAccount. No user interaction and no high privileges are needed (UI:N, PR:L). Exploitation is limited to environments that actually grant HelmRelease creation to non-admin tenants; clusters where only cluster administrators can create HelmRelease CRs, or where admission policy constrains the controller, are not exposed. Network reachability to the Kubernetes API server is required (AV:N). |
| Impact | The signals point to a genuine high priority rather than an inflated CVSS. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.9) indicates remote, low-complexity exploitation by an authenticated low-privileged tenant, with a scope change reflecting the crossing of the namespace/tenant security boundary into cluster-wide impact and full C/I/A loss. The one meaningful precondition (PR:L) is exactly the multi-tenant model RHACM is built for, so in shared clusters the barrier is low. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, or POC indicator was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified and there is no confirmed public exploit; it is also not in CISA KEV, so there is no evidence of active exploitation. The CWE-441 confused-deputy pattern is well understood and straightforward to trigger for anyone with HelmRelease create permissions, which keeps real-world risk high for any environment that delegates HelmRelease creation to tenants; single-tenant or tightly-restricted-RBAC deployments face materially lower exposure. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A tenant with delegated permission to create HelmRelease CRs in their own namespace submits a crafted Helm chart whose templates declare cluster-scoped objects such as a ClusterRoleBinding granting cluster-admin to the tenant, plus resources in namespaces they do not own. The HelmRelease controller renders and applies these manifests under its own elevated ServiceAccount, so the objects are created cluster-wide, giving the tenant control over the entire cluster. No public POC is identified in the input, but the low attack complexity and network vector make exploitation straightforward for anyone holding HelmRelease create rights. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 20, 2026
Privilege escalation and cluster-wide arbitrary resource deployment affects the multicloud-operators-subscription component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2. A low-privileged tenant permitted to create HelmRelease custom resources can abuse the HelmRelease controller, which renders and applies Helm chart templates using its own elevated ServiceAccount, to deploy arbitrary resources anywhere in the cluster and bypass namespace/RBAC boundaries. Rated CVSS 9.9 with a scope change; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Consult the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67567 (tracking bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2514224) and upgrade RHACM to the fixed release once published; no vendor-released patch version is identified in the provided data, so verify the exact patched build directly with Red Hat before scheduling. As compensating controls until patched, restrict who can create HelmRelease custom resources by tightening RBAC so untrusted tenants cannot create them in shared clusters (trade-off: breaks self-service Helm-based app delivery for those tenants); use an admission controller / policy engine such as OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno to validate or deny HelmRelease CRs and to constrain the resources the controller may apply per namespace (trade-off: requires policy authoring and testing to avoid blocking legitimate charts); and where feasible isolate untrusted tenants onto dedicated clusters rather than sharing a cluster with the HelmRelease controller (trade-off: higher operational and infrastructure cost).
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected technology is the multicloud-operators-subscription controller in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (RHACM), which manages GitOps-style application delivery on OpenShift/Kubernetes. Per the CPE cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetes_2, the vulnerable component is RHACM 2.x. The root cause maps to CWE-441 (Unintended Proxy or Intermediary, the 'Confused Deputy' pattern): the HelmRelease controller acts as a deputy that processes tenant-supplied Helm chart templates using its own highly privileged ServiceAccount rather than the requesting tenant's identity, and it does not validate that the templated resources are within the tenant's authorized scope. Because Helm charts can template arbitrary Kubernetes manifests (ClusterRoleBindings, resources in other namespaces, etc.), the controller effectively lends its cluster-level authority to any user able to submit a HelmRelease CR.
Know when Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes 2 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Authenticated tenant (PR:L) reaches the K8s API over the network (AV:N/AC:L) and crosses the tenant boundary (S:C) to gain cluster-wide control with full C/I/A loss.
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorVendor: redhat
DescriptionCVE.org
A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-subscription component. This vulnerability allows a tenant, who has the ability to create HelmRelease custom resources (CRs), to bypass existing security controls. The system's HelmRelease controller processes Helm chart templates using its own elevated ServiceAccount privileges without proper validation. This enables the tenant to deploy arbitrary resources across the entire cluster, leading to a significant security compromise.
Executive ViewAI
A critical privilege escalation flaw in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 (RHACM 2) allows authenticated low-privileged users to bypass RBAC boundaries and deploy arbitrary resources cluster-wide. This threatens the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of Kubernetes infrastructure and any workloads deployed within affected clusters. Organizations using RHACM 2 with multi-tenant environments require immediate mitigation.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: enforce restrictive RBAC policies preventing non-administrative users from creating or modifying HelmRelease resources; deploy admission controllers to block unauthorized resource deployment across namespaces; enable comprehensive audit logging of all HelmRelease operations; implement network segmentation to limit the blast radius of the HelmRelease controller's privileges; and conduct immediate cluster access review to identify unauthorized HelmRelease creators.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
Cross-cluster remote code execution in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 (multicloud-integrations / A
Cross-tenant bearer-token disclosure in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 (RHACM) lets an authenticat
Unauthorized cross-tenant Secret and ConfigMap access in the multicloud-operators-channel component of Red Hat Advanced
Secret exfiltration across Kubernetes namespace boundaries in the multicloud-operators-subscription component of Red Hat
The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe
Privilege escalation in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 lets a namespace-scoped tenant abuse the mu
Privilege escalation in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management's multicloud-operators-subscription controller lets a low-pr
Improper access control in Lighthouse - the cross-cluster service-discovery component of Submariner shipped with Red Hat
Privilege escalation in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 stems from the search-v2-operator being bou
Cross-cluster remote code execution in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 (acm-search-v2-rhel9 search
Remote code execution as root on the Submariner gateway node is possible in cert-auth mode, affecting Submariner as bund
Cross-namespace Secret manipulation in the multicloud-operators-channel component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management
EUVD-2026-63589
GHSA-gf3r-gm67-jgrv
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB