Skip to main content

Red Hat ACM CVE-2026-67567

| EUVDEUVD-2026-63589 CRITICAL
Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') (CWE-441)
2026-08-20 redhat GHSA-gf3r-gm67-jgrv
9.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: redhat
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as tenant with HelmRelease create rights
  2. Delivery
    Submit crafted Helm chart with cluster-scoped manifests
  3. Exploit
    Controller renders templates under elevated ServiceAccount
  4. Execution
    Arbitrary resources applied cluster-wide
  5. Impact
    Grant self cluster-admin and compromise cluster

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service Proxy/intermediary controls
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated tenant identity (CVSS PR:L) that has been granted RBAC permission to create HelmRelease custom resources handled by the multicloud-operators-subscription HelmRelease controller in RHACM 2.x. The concrete prerequisite is this delegated HelmRelease-create capability combined with a deployment where that controller reconciles tenant-supplied charts using its own elevated ServiceAccount. No user interaction and no high privileges are needed (UI:N, PR:L). Exploitation is limited to environments that actually grant HelmRelease creation to non-admin tenants; clusters where only cluster administrators can create HelmRelease CRs, or where admission policy constrains the controller, are not exposed. Network reachability to the Kubernetes API server is required (AV:N).

Impact

The signals point to a genuine high priority rather than an inflated CVSS. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.9) indicates remote, low-complexity exploitation by an authenticated low-privileged tenant, with a scope change reflecting the crossing of the namespace/tenant security boundary into cluster-wide impact and full C/I/A loss. The one meaningful precondition (PR:L) is exactly the multi-tenant model RHACM is built for, so in shared clusters the barrier is low. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, or POC indicator was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified and there is no confirmed public exploit; it is also not in CISA KEV, so there is no evidence of active exploitation. The CWE-441 confused-deputy pattern is well understood and straightforward to trigger for anyone with HelmRelease create permissions, which keeps real-world risk high for any environment that delegates HelmRelease creation to tenants; single-tenant or tightly-restricted-RBAC deployments face materially lower exposure.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A tenant with delegated permission to create HelmRelease CRs in their own namespace submits a crafted Helm chart whose templates declare cluster-scoped objects such as a ClusterRoleBinding granting cluster-admin to the tenant, plus resources in namespaces they do not own. The HelmRelease controller renders and applies these manifests under its own elevated ServiceAccount, so the objects are created cluster-wide, giving the tenant control over the entire cluster. No public POC is identified in the input, but the low attack complexity and network vector make exploitation straightforward for anyone holding HelmRelease create rights.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 20, 2026

Privilege escalation and cluster-wide arbitrary resource deployment affects the multicloud-operators-subscription component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2. A low-privileged tenant permitted to create HelmRelease custom resources can abuse the HelmRelease controller, which renders and applies Helm chart templates using its own elevated ServiceAccount, to deploy arbitrary resources anywhere in the cluster and bypass namespace/RBAC boundaries. Rated CVSS 9.9 with a scope change; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Consult the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67567 (tracking bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2514224) and upgrade RHACM to the fixed release once published; no vendor-released patch version is identified in the provided data, so verify the exact patched build directly with Red Hat before scheduling. As compensating controls until patched, restrict who can create HelmRelease custom resources by tightening RBAC so untrusted tenants cannot create them in shared clusters (trade-off: breaks self-service Helm-based app delivery for those tenants); use an admission controller / policy engine such as OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno to validate or deny HelmRelease CRs and to constrain the resources the controller may apply per namespace (trade-off: requires policy authoring and testing to avoid blocking legitimate charts); and where feasible isolate untrusted tenants onto dedicated clusters rather than sharing a cluster with the HelmRelease controller (trade-off: higher operational and infrastructure cost).

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected technology is the multicloud-operators-subscription controller in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (RHACM), which manages GitOps-style application delivery on OpenShift/Kubernetes. Per the CPE cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetes_2, the vulnerable component is RHACM 2.x. The root cause maps to CWE-441 (Unintended Proxy or Intermediary, the 'Confused Deputy' pattern): the HelmRelease controller acts as a deputy that processes tenant-supplied Helm chart templates using its own highly privileged ServiceAccount rather than the requesting tenant's identity, and it does not validate that the templated resources are within the tenant's authorized scope. Because Helm charts can template arbitrary Kubernetes manifests (ClusterRoleBindings, resources in other namespaces, etc.), the controller effectively lends its cluster-level authority to any user able to submit a HelmRelease CR.

Know when Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes 2 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 9.9 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.9 CRITICAL

Authenticated tenant (PR:L) reaches the K8s API over the network (AV:N/AC:L) and crosses the tenant boundary (S:C) to gain cluster-wide control with full C/I/A loss.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Red Hat 9.9 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-subscription component. This vulnerability allows a tenant, who has the ability to create HelmRelease custom resources (CRs), to bypass existing security controls. The system's HelmRelease controller processes Helm chart templates using its own elevated ServiceAccount privileges without proper validation. This enables the tenant to deploy arbitrary resources across the entire cluster, leading to a significant security compromise.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical privilege escalation flaw in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 (RHACM 2) allows authenticated low-privileged users to bypass RBAC boundaries and deploy arbitrary resources cluster-wide. This threatens the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of Kubernetes infrastructure and any workloads deployed within affected clusters. Organizations using RHACM 2 with multi-tenant environments require immediate mitigation.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: enforce restrictive RBAC policies preventing non-administrative users from creating or modifying HelmRelease resources; deploy admission controllers to block unauthorized resource deployment across namespaces; enable comprehensive audit logging of all HelmRelease operations; implement network segmentation to limit the blast radius of the HelmRelease controller's privileges; and conduct immediate cluster access review to identify unauthorized HelmRelease creators.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 75% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise OpenShift/Kubernetes fleet manager, common but not ubiquitous
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +50
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_advanced_cluster_management_for_kubernetes_2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-72526 CRITICAL
9.9 Aug 12

Cross-cluster remote code execution in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 (multicloud-integrations / A

CVE-2026-70398 CRITICAL
9.6 Aug 12

Cross-tenant bearer-token disclosure in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 (RHACM) lets an authenticat

CVE-2026-73122 HIGH
7.7 Aug 12

Unauthorized cross-tenant Secret and ConfigMap access in the multicloud-operators-channel component of Red Hat Advanced

CVE-2026-66878 HIGH
7.7 Aug 12

Secret exfiltration across Kubernetes namespace boundaries in the multicloud-operators-subscription component of Red Hat

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-72508 CRITICAL
9.9 Aug 12

Privilege escalation in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 lets a namespace-scoped tenant abuse the mu

CVE-2026-66792 CRITICAL
9.9 Aug 17

Privilege escalation in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management's multicloud-operators-subscription controller lets a low-pr

CVE-2026-66788 CRITICAL
9.9 Aug 20

Improper access control in Lighthouse - the cross-cluster service-discovery component of Submariner shipped with Red Hat

CVE-2026-70496 CRITICAL
9.9 Aug 19

Privilege escalation in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 stems from the search-v2-operator being bou

CVE-2026-71471 CRITICAL
9.0 Aug 12

Cross-cluster remote code execution in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 (acm-search-v2-rhel9 search

CVE-2026-66786 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 02

Remote code execution as root on the Submariner gateway node is possible in cert-auth mode, affecting Submariner as bund

CVE-2026-64927 MEDIUM
6.4 Aug 12

Cross-namespace Secret manipulation in the multicloud-operators-channel component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy