Skip to main content

IntraVUE CVE-2026-42933

| EUVDEUVD-2026-48446 CRITICAL
Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') (CWE-441)
2026-07-23 icscert GHSA-jp3p-8p4m-hxwj
10.0
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: icscert
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach exposed IntraVUE instance
  2. Delivery
    Coerce IntraVUE into active proxy
  3. Exploit
    Relay traffic across OT segmentation
  4. Execution
    Access isolated OT devices
  5. Impact
    Read or manipulate control traffic

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service Proxy/intermediary controls
Exploitation Conditions

The exploit requires network reachability to an IntraVUE instance (version 3.2.1a14 or earlier) that is positioned with connectivity spanning the segmentation boundary the attacker wishes to cross - IntraVUE's normal deployment as a cross-segment network-discovery tool is itself the enabling condition. Per CVSS AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, exploitation needs no authentication, no user interaction, and no non-default configuration. The practical limiting factor is exposure: the attacker must be able to reach IntraVUE's proxy-capable service, so deployments where IntraVUE is confined to an isolated management VLAN or fronted by strict firewall rules materially reduce reachability, and the impact is only meaningful where IntraVUE actually bridges an IT/OT or inter-zone boundary.

Impact

All available severity signals point the same direction: the CVSS 3.1 vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H yields a maximal 10.0, indicating remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with a scope change into adjacent (OT) systems. That scope change is the crux - the direct technical impact on IntraVUE matters less than the downstream OT assets it can expose. However, EPSS was not provided, the CVE is not in CISA KEV, and no POC/exploit reference is present, so the real-world exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified from the input and should not be assumed high despite the 10.0 base score. The CVSS asserts a fully network-reachable unauthenticated path; verify against your deployment, because IntraVUE is often management-plane software whose exposure depends on whether its interface/services are reachable from untrusted networks. Net: treat as a high-priority segmentation-integrity risk in OT environments, but recognize that the 10.0 reflects worst-case scope impact rather than confirmed active exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can reach an exposed IntraVUE instance from an IT-side or otherwise untrusted network sends requests that coerce IntraVUE into proxying traffic through to devices in a segmented OT zone. Using this relay, the attacker reaches PLCs, HMIs, or other assets that firewall/VLAN segmentation was intended to isolate, then reads or manipulates OT communications. No authentication or user interaction is required per the CVSS vector, and no public POC is currently identified.

Emergency Immediate action required. Why: CRITICAL + active threat signals, no patch available.
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 23, 2026

Network-segmentation bypass in Pronetiqs (Panduit) IntraVUE 3.2.1a14 and earlier lets a remote, unauthenticated attacker abuse the product as an active proxy/intermediary to relay traffic across otherwise-isolated OT boundaries. Because IntraVUE typically sits with visibility into both IT and industrial control network segments, this confused-deputy behavior effectively neutralizes the network zoning that protects OT assets. Rated CVSS 10.0 with a scope change; no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data; consult CISA advisory ICSA-26-204-04 (https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-204-04) for the vendor's fixed build and upgrade guidance, and apply the vendor-remediated release as the primary fix once confirmed. In the interim, apply compensating controls consistent with ICS best practice: restrict network access to IntraVUE hosts and services so they are reachable only from a dedicated management segment or jump host (trade-off: legitimate operators must connect via that path), place IntraVUE behind an ICS-aware firewall and explicitly deny it from relaying traffic between IT and OT zones rather than relying on its own segmentation posture, and disable or block any inbound proxy/relay-capable interface that is not operationally required. Enforce that remote access to the OT environment uses hardened VPN and monitor IntraVUE for anomalous cross-segment connections. These controls reduce reachability but may complicate legitimate cross-segment discovery, which is IntraVUE's core function, so validate monitoring coverage after locking it down.

Affected VersionsENISA

Panduit Intravue 0 ≤3.2.1a14

Affected Packages

euvd panduit_intravue no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IntraVUE is an industrial network device-discovery and topology-visualization platform used to map and monitor Ethernet/OT networks, which requires it to be reachable across multiple network segments. The flaw maps to CWE-441 (Unintended Proxy or Intermediary, the 'confused deputy' class): a component with legitimate cross-segment reachability can be induced to forward or relay attacker traffic on the attacker's behalf. The affected component is identified in CPE as cpe:2.3:a:pronetiqs:panduit_intravue (all versions through 3.2.1a14). Because the proxying occurs at the application layer of a tool that is deliberately positioned to span IT and OT zones, the trust IntraVUE is granted becomes the mechanism that defeats segmentation controls such as firewalls, VLANs, and conduits between Purdue-model levels.

Know when Panduit Intravue gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (icscert) PRIMARY 10.0 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
vuln.today AI 10.0 CRITICAL

Remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated proxy abuse (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); segmentation bypass reaches other systems, giving scope change (S:C) with high C/I/A on exposed OT assets.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (icscert).

CVSS VectorVendor: icscert

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an unintended proxy or intermediary vulnerability which could allow an attacker to use an active proxy, which would bypass OT segmentation.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Pronetiqs (Panduit) IntraVUE 3.2.1a14 and earlier contains a critical network-segmentation bypass allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to relay traffic between isolated OT and IT segments, effectively neutralizing the network protections that isolate industrial control systems. Since IntraVUE typically bridges both network zones, compromising this visibility appliance exposes critical OT infrastructure to direct attack. No vendor patch is currently available.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: (1) restrict IntraVUE's network egress via firewall rules to prevent relay of OT-bound traffic; (2) deploy a jump-server or bastion host between IntraVUE and OT segments to enforce application-layer inspection; (3) segment IntraVUE into a DMZ isolated from both IT and OT networks, requiring authenticated jump-host transit for any cross-zone access; (4) implement real-time monitoring and alerting for any unusual Layer 3/4 traffic patterns originating from IntraVUE; (5) maintain a complete asset inventory of devices reachable through IntraVUE to accelerate incident response if exploitation occurs.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Threat Score
4.0/10
Composite threat intelligence
EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 79% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche industrial OT network-monitoring product, limited to ICS deployments
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Social Media
4
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
CRITICAL + active threat signals, no patch available
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Out-of-Cycle
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

60
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +50
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: +10
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Threat IntelligenceMISP

CISA Advisories
Sources: CISA (public domain), CISA Vulnrichment

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy