Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Send crafted chunked HTTP request to mixed-proxy endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Trigger unsigned-to-signed integer conversion error in libsoup parser
  3. Exploit
    Desynchronize HTTP message boundary interpretation between libsoup and adjacent non-libsoup proxy
  4. Execution
    Smuggle attacker-controlled hidden request through proxy boundary
  5. Impact
    Bypass authentication controls or inject poisoned web cache entry

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service HTTP request consistency
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that libsoup be deployed in one of two specific proxy topologies: (1) libsoup operating as a backend server behind a non-libsoup reverse proxy such as nginx, HAProxy, or Apache httpd, or (2) libsoup acting as a forward proxy in front of a non-libsoup backend server. The integer conversion error in chunked encoding parsing only produces exploitable HTTP request smuggling when two HTTP implementations with differing boundary interpretations are present in the same connection path. libsoup deployments used solely as an HTTP client library - such as in GNOME desktop applications - are NOT exposed to this attack vector. Exploitation is further constrained by CVSS AC:H (High Attack Complexity), reflecting the mandatory topological prerequisite. Authentication is not required (PR:N) and no user interaction is needed (UI:N) once the proxy configuration condition is met.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 4.8 (Medium) accurately reflects constrained exploitability. AV:N confirms the attack originates over the network, but AC:H (High Attack Complexity) captures the non-trivial prerequisite: a specific mixed-proxy topology must already exist in the target environment. PR:N and UI:N indicate no authentication or user interaction is required once that topology condition is satisfied. Impacts are bounded at C:L/I:L/A:N, meaning partial confidentiality and integrity compromise with no availability impact. EPSS data was not provided in the available input and cannot be assessed. This CVE is not in CISA KEV and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. Real-world risk is elevated for organizations running libsoup in reverse-proxy or forward-proxy architectures alongside non-libsoup components, since their existing infrastructure may already satisfy the AC:H condition by design. Deployments using libsoup solely as a standalone HTTP client library face no exploitation risk from this vector. The tags 'Authentication Bypass' and 'Request Smuggling' are consistent with the CWE-444 classification and the described downstream impacts.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker sends a crafted HTTP request with a malformed chunked Transfer-Encoding body to a service where libsoup acts as an intermediary proxy alongside a non-libsoup component. The unsigned-to-signed integer conversion error causes libsoup and the adjacent proxy to disagree on HTTP message boundaries, enabling the attacker to smuggle a hidden second request that bypasses authentication controls applied at the proxy layer or injects a poisoned entry into a shared web cache, affecting subsequent legitimate users. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 29, 2026

HTTP request smuggling in libsoup allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exploit an unsigned-to-signed integer conversion error in the soup_body_input_stream_read_chunked() function via a crafted HTTP request. The vulnerability is confined to specific proxy topologies where libsoup operates either behind or in front of a non-libsoup HTTP intermediary, and successful exploitation can result in authentication bypass, web cache poisoning, or unauthorized access. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and this CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, but the integrity and confidentiality impacts warrant urgent attention in any affected mixed-proxy deployment.

RemediationAI

Monitor and apply the vendor-supplied errata from Red Hat once published; the advisory is tracked at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6324 and Bugzilla entry 2458479. No specific patched libsoup version number is confirmed in the available input data - patch availability is inferred from the existence of an upstream GitLab issue (#508) but a released fix version has not been independently verified, so treat patch status as 'upstream fix in progress' until Red Hat publishes errata. As an immediate compensating control, audit all deployments to identify where libsoup components sit in a proxy chain alongside non-libsoup intermediaries; eliminating the mixed-proxy topology removes the attack surface entirely and carries no functional downside if an alternative intermediary is available. Where topology changes are not feasible, deploying an HTTP normalization layer or WAF between the proxy boundary can reduce the ability to craft divergently interpreted chunked payloads, though this adds latency and operational overhead. Additionally, disabling HTTP response caching on affected proxy nodes until a patch is applied directly mitigates the cache poisoning impact vector.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

libsoup is a GNOME HTTP client/server library widely packaged across Linux distributions, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 10. The flaw resides in soup_body_input_stream_read_chunked(), the function responsible for parsing HTTP chunked transfer-encoding bodies. An unsigned-to-signed integer conversion error in this function creates an inconsistent interpretation of HTTP message framing boundaries - the exact root cause class identified as CWE-444 (Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests, commonly known as HTTP Request Smuggling). When libsoup disagrees with an adjacent non-libsoup proxy on where one HTTP request ends and the next begins, an attacker can exploit that desynchronization to inject a smuggled request. The CPE data (cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6 through red_hat_enterprise_linux_10) confirms the vulnerable libsoup packages are present across all major RHEL generations. The upstream defect is tracked at GNOME GitLab issue #508.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 4.8 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
SUSE MEDIUM
Red Hat 4.8 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw was found in libsoup. A remote attacker could exploit an unsigned to signed conversion error in the soup_body_input_stream_read_chunked() function by sending a malicious HTTP request. This vulnerability occurs when libsoup operates behind a non-libsoup proxy server or as a proxy in front of a non-libsoup backend server. Successful exploitation can allow an attacker to bypass security controls, poison web caches, or gain unauthorized access.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 88% exploitable
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

24
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +24
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

HTTP request smuggling exploits inconsistencies in how front-end and back-end servers parse HTTP message boundaries.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Medium
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 Fixed

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy