Intel TDX MigTD
CVE-2026-62929
HIGH
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain privileged hypervisor/VMM position
-
ExploitSend crafted virtio-vsock messages to MigTD
-
ExecutionTrigger expired pointer dereference in MigTD
-
ImpactEscalate privilege and disclose Trust Domain data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Expired pointer prevention
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an attacker already holding privileged system-software control of the host - a malicious or compromised hypervisor/VMM (PR:H) - with local access (AV:L) to the platform running the Intel TDX Migration Trust Domain (MigTD); the flaw is reached through MigTD's virtio-vsock communication interface. No special internal knowledge, no attack requirements (AT:N), and no user interaction (UI:N) are needed, and attack complexity is low (AC:L). The principal limiting factor is the PR:H precondition: the attacker must occupy the privileged host position that TDX is designed to distrust, and access is local rather than remote, so this is not exploitable by an unprivileged or remote actor. Impact is confined to the vulnerable TDX system (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) with no stated propagation to other systems. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.4 (High) is driven by high impact to the vulnerable system (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) combined with low attack complexity (AC:L/AT:N) and no user interaction, but it is materially gated by two local factors: AV:L (local access) and PR:H (high privileges required). The threat model in the Intel advisory is explicit - a 'system software adversary with a privileged user,' i.e. a malicious or compromised hypervisor/VMM, is the attacker. This is the expected adversary in Intel TDX's confidential-computing trust model, where the whole point is to protect a guest Trust Domain from a privileged host; so PR:H here does not mean 'hard to reach' in the way it would for ordinary application software - the privileged host is precisely the party TDX is defending against. There is no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS score, and no public exploit or PoC reference in the supplied data, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The vendor priority label is 'this_week,' consistent with a serious-but-not-emergency fix. Scope is confined to the vulnerable system (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N) - no stated pivot to other systems. Net: this is a genuine priority for TDX/MigTD operators because the flaw undermines the specific isolation guarantee TDX sells, but the local + privileged-host precondition keeps it well short of mass-exploitable internet-facing risk. No conflicting signals were found; the chief gap is the absence of EPSS/KEV/PoC data rather than contradictory data. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A malicious or compromised hypervisor/VMM, which already holds privileged control of the host, communicates with the MigTD over the virtio-vsock transport and sends crafted messages that cause MigTD to dereference an expired (stale) pointer in its virtio-vsock implementation. By controlling the freed/expired memory, the attacker can corrupt MigTD state to escalate privilege within the Migration Trust Domain and disclose confidential information it handles. No public exploit or PoC is identified in the available data; the exact trigger sequence is not described in the sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 10, 2026
Privilege escalation and information disclosure in Intel TDX MigTD stem from an expired-pointer dereference in the virtio-vsock implementation, reachable by a malicious or compromised hypervisor holding Ring 0 control. The issue is local (AV:L) and requires high privileges (PR:H) but is low complexity with no attack requirements or user interaction, and successful exploitation can result in high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the TDX system while leaving subsequent systems unaffected; no public exploit was identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Apply the Intel MigTD fix referenced by Intel SA-01580 (https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01580.html); the supplied data does not include an exact fixed version, so confirm the patched build in that advisory before deployment. No specific workaround is provided in the available sources; the main exposure constraint is the PR:H requirement that the attacker already control privileged host system software, so limiting that role to trusted administrators is a compensating measure rather than a complete fix, and the vendor update should be validated and applied as soon as its fixed version is confirmed.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-825 (Expired Pointer Dereference) describes use of a pointer after the object it references has been freed or invalidated, which can produce memory corruption or unintended data exposure; in this case the faulty dereference is in MigTD's virtio-vsock implementation. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:n/a:intel(r)_tdx_migration_trust_domain_(migtd):*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* identifies Intel(R) TDX Migration Trust Domain (MigTD) as the affected component, with a wildcard version that does not pin a release. The supplied CVSS 4.0 vector CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N means local access, low complexity, no attack requirements, high privileges required, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact confined to the vulnerable TDX system; the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) is consistent. The exact trigger within virtio-vsock and the specific data exposed are not described in the available sources.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Local privileged host (malicious VMM) is the defined attacker so AV:L and PR:H; low complexity and no interaction per the advisory; full CIA loss to MigTD with scope unchanged.
Primary rating from Vendor (intel).
CVSS VectorVendor: intel
DescriptionCVE.org
Expired pointer dereference in the MigTD's virtio-vsock implementation for the Intel(R) TDX Migration Trust Domain (MigTD) within Ring 0: Hypervisor may allow an escalation of privilege and information disclosure. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
Executive ViewAI
Intel TDX MigTD contains a high-severity flaw that allows a malicious or compromised hypervisor to break the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of trusted execution environments. This undermines the core security guarantee of TDX, putting sensitive workloads and data protected by the technology at risk. Leadership should prioritize remediation because the vulnerability erodes customer trust in TDX-based isolation and could lead to regulatory and reputational consequences.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Implement hypervisor integrity monitoring, enforce least privilege on hypervisor access, and isolate high-value TDX workloads on dedicated hosts.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
NVD
CVE.org
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB