Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach target RPC endpoint on TCP 135
-
DeliverySend preparatory RPC requests to groom heap layout
-
ExploitSend malformed RPC payload triggering heap overflow
-
ExecutionCorrupt heap metadata or function pointer
-
PersistRedirect execution to attacker-controlled code
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code as service account
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | The attack requires network-level access to the target host's RPC endpoint - specifically TCP port 135 (the RPC Endpoint Mapper) and the dynamically assigned high ports used by RPC services. No authentication is required (PR:N confirmed by CVSS vector), and no user interaction is needed. The AC:H rating indicates that exploitation is not reliable against arbitrary heap states; the attacker likely must engineer specific heap layout conditions, possibly via repeated connection attempts or a sequence of preparatory requests, before the overflow produces a controlled primitive. Exploitation is limited by: (1) network reachability to RPC ports, which should be firewall-restricted in hardened environments; (2) the AC:H complexity barrier requiring non-trivial heap grooming; and (3) host-based firewall rules on modern Windows versions that may restrict inbound RPC by default from untrusted networks. There is no indication of a non-default configuration requirement - the RPC Runtime is active by default on all affected Windows versions. |
| Impact | The CVSS 8.1 score reflects a meaningful tension: the full C:H/I:H/A:H impact with AV:N/PR:N/UI:N signals critical exploitability potential, but AC:H substantially reduces the practical exploitation rate. No EPSS score was provided in the input data, so probability of exploitation cannot be quantified numerically. KEV status is absent, and no POC has been identified, suggesting weaponized exploitation has not been observed at publication time. Despite AC:H, RPC Runtime's ubiquity means that even a low per-attempt success rate becomes dangerous at scale - automated scanners or worm-capable malware can probe millions of endpoints. Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 reach (or have reached) ESU boundaries, and organizations without ESU enrollment face potential patch gaps. The combination of network attack vector, zero authentication, and pervasive deployment footprint justifies high-priority remediation despite the complexity barrier. This is not a dismiss-due-to-AC:H situation; it is a patch-rapidly situation, particularly for externally reachable RPC services. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An unauthenticated attacker on the same network segment - or with access to a Windows host's RPC endpoint on TCP 135 and associated dynamic ports - sends a specially crafted RPC request designed to trigger the heap overflow condition in the RPC Runtime. After manipulating heap layout to satisfy AC:H requirements (for example, through repeated connection attempts to achieve a specific allocation state), the attacker overwrites a function pointer or heap metadata to redirect execution flow, ultimately achieving arbitrary code execution under the security context of the RPC service. No public proof-of-concept has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026
Remote code execution via heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows RPC Runtime affects every supported Windows desktop and server release from Windows 10 1607 through Windows 11 26H1 and Windows Server 2012 through Server 2025. An unauthenticated remote attacker who can reach an exposed RPC endpoint can corrupt heap memory and achieve arbitrary code execution, yielding full confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise of the target system. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis; however, the breadth of affected versions, combined with network accessibility and no authentication requirement, elevates operational priority for internet-facing and laterally-reachable Windows infrastructure.
RemediationAI
Apply the Microsoft security update via Windows Update or WSUS to bring all systems to or above the patched build for their respective release: Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33296, Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5499, Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9115, Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9418, Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23337, Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26279, Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7517, Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9168, Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9168, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.2704, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7663/10.0.19045.7663, and Windows 10 1607/1809 to 10.0.14393.9418/10.0.17763.9115 respectively. The full patch guidance is at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-62781. Organizations running Windows Server 2012 or 2012 R2 must verify active ESU enrollment to receive this patch, as these versions are past standard support. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not possible, restrict inbound RPC traffic (TCP 135, dynamic high ports) at perimeter and host-based firewalls to trusted IP ranges only; note this may impact DCOM, WMI remoting, and distributed application functionality. Do not expose RPC endpoints directly to the internet.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 19 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The Windows RPC Runtime library (rpcrt4.dll) implements the Microsoft RPC protocol stack, which underpins core Windows services, SMB-adjacent functionality, DCOM, WMI, and hundreds of other inter-process and inter-host communication channels. CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow) indicates that attacker-controlled input causes a write beyond the bounds of a heap-allocated buffer, enabling classical heap metadata corruption or controlled overwrite primitives. RPC Runtime is present and active by default on all Windows endpoints and servers, making it a pervasive attack surface. The CVSS Attack Complexity of High (AC:H) implies that exploitation is not straightforward - likely requiring precise heap layout manipulation, a race condition, or targeting a specific RPC interface binding - but the lack of any privilege or user interaction requirement (PR:N/UI:N) means an unauthenticated attacker on the network can attempt exploitation autonomously once the conditions are met.
Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-exposed RPC Runtime, no auth required, but high complexity for heap grooming; full system impact upon success.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Heap-based buffer overflow in RPC Runtime allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
Windows RPC Runtime vulnerability (CVE-2026-62781) enables remote attackers to gain complete control of Windows computers and servers across all supported versions without requiring credentials. Every Windows machine connected to the network or internet-including desktops, laptops, and critical servers-is at risk of unauthorized access, data theft, and operational disruption. Immediate patching is essential given the broad attack surface and absence of authentication barriers.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
More in Windows 10 1607
View allWindows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX
<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi
Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f
The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows
The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co
Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth
The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited
Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in
EUVD-2026-56665
GHSA-7jg6-xhfv-6598
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB