Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with low-privilege account
-
DeliveryCraft ZIP decompression bomb
-
ExploitUpload to package/backup extraction endpoint
-
ExecutionZipArchiver::extract() expands without limits
-
PersistExhaust disk storage
-
ImpactDenial of service
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Compression ratio limits
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated account (CVSS PR:L) with permission to reach a Grav feature that invokes ZipArchiver::extract() - specifically the ZIP-based package/plugin/theme installation or backup-restore upload paths - and the ability to supply an attacker-controlled ZIP archive to one of those endpoints. Limiting factors: valid low-privilege credentials and access to the extraction feature are mandatory (no anonymous/default-open path), and impact is confined to availability (disk exhaustion / DoS) with no data disclosure or code execution. Exploitability is further bounded by available free disk space and any pre-existing filesystem quotas on the Grav data volume. |
| Impact | The signals are internally consistent and point to a moderate, availability-only risk rather than a top-tier priority. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N) indicates a network-reachable attack of low complexity with no user interaction, but PR:L confirms the attacker must already hold authenticated low-privilege access - the extraction paths in Grav are administrative/upload features, not anonymous endpoints. Impact is strictly VA:H (availability) with VC:N/VI:N: no confidentiality or integrity loss and no scope change, consistent with a pure DoS. No EPSS score was provided in the input, there is no KEV listing, and no POC is referenced, so there is no evidence of active or imminent widespread exploitation. Practical priority is therefore driven by exposure: instances that grant untrusted or semi-trusted users upload/install rights warrant prompt patching, whereas single-admin deployments face limited real-world risk because the required privilege already implies substantial control. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker holding a low-privilege authenticated account with access to Grav's upload or package-installation feature crafts a small ZIP decompression bomb (highly redundant data with deep nesting) and submits it to a function that calls ZipArchiver::extract(). Extraction proceeds without size or depth limits, expanding the archive until the server's disk fills, halting Grav and potentially other services on the same volume. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, but the technique is well understood and trivial to reproduce. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 10, 2026
Denial of service in Grav CMS before 2.0.1 allows authenticated users to exhaust server storage by uploading a crafted ZIP archive (a decompression bomb) that the ZipArchiver::extract() routine expands without enforcing limits on uncompressed size, file count, or nesting depth. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 7.1 reflects a network-reachable, low-privilege flaw whose sole impact is high availability loss. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Grav 2.0.1 - upgrade to version 2.0.1 or later, which adds limits to ZipArchiver::extract(), per the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-928x-9mpw-8h56 (https://github.com/getgrav/grav/security/advisories/GHSA-928x-9mpw-8h56) and the VulnCheck advisory (https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/grav-before-decompression-bomb-via-ziparchiver). Where immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict ZIP upload/installation capabilities (plugin/theme/package install and backup restore) to a minimal set of fully trusted administrators, since PR:L means that feature is the attack surface; enforce filesystem quotas or place Grav's data directory on a dedicated partition so uncontrolled expansion cannot exhaust the root volume (trade-off: extraction of legitimate large archives may fail once the quota is hit); and add disk-usage monitoring with alerting so runaway extraction is detected quickly. These controls reduce but do not eliminate the risk, so patching remains the primary remediation.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in composer, euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Grav is a flat-file, PHP-based content management system (CPE cpe:2.3:a:getgrav:grav) that accepts ZIP archives for functions such as package/plugin/theme installation and backup restoration. The vulnerable ZipArchiver::extract() method decompresses archive contents without validating the ratio between compressed input and uncompressed output. This maps directly to CWE-409 (Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data / Data Amplification): a small crafted archive containing highly redundant data and/or deep recursive nesting can expand by many orders of magnitude on disk. Because Grav is a flat-file CMS that writes extracted content to the filesystem rather than a database, uncontrolled expansion directly consumes finite disk resources.
Know when Grav gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Network-reachable upload feature (AV:N/AC:L) requires an authenticated low-privilege account (PR:L); impact is pure disk-exhaustion DoS, so C:N/I:N/A:H with no scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Grav before 2.0.1 contains a decompression bomb vulnerability in ZipArchiver::extract() that lacks limits on uncompressed size, file count, and nesting depth. Attackers can supply a crafted ZIP archive that expands to fill available disk space, causing denial of service by exhausting storage resources.
Executive ViewAI
Grav CMS deployments face service availability risk when authenticated users upload files engineered to exhaust server storage, potentially causing complete system failure. For organizations relying on Grav for customer-facing or critical internal services, unexpected downtime poses significant operational and reputational impact. The immediate threat stems from insider risk or compromised user accounts, and no vendor patch is currently available.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict file upload capabilities to administrative users only, monitor server disk utilization with automated alerts above 80% capacity, disable ZIP file decompression features if not operationally required, enforce maximum upload file sizes, implement upload rate limiting (1-5 requests per user per hour), and maintain audit logs of all file uploads for forensic investigation.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Server-side template injection (SSTI) in Grav (getgrav/grav) prior to 1.8.0-beta.27 allows an authenticated attacker hol
Broken access control in Grav CMS (CWE-285) before 1.8.0-beta.27 lets an authenticated editor-level user escalate their
A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in Grav CMS v1.7.48 allows an authenticated admin to upload a malicious plug
Grav is a file-based Web platform. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.9), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, low a
GravCMS 1.10.7 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to write arbitrary YAML configuration files, leading to full serv
Remote code execution in Grav CMS 2.0.4 (fixed in 2.0.7) lets an authenticated user holding the admin.pages or api.pages
Remote code execution in Grav CMS before 2.0.15 allows attackers holding page-edit or blueprint-config privileges to wri
Vertical privilege escalation in Grav CMS before 2.0.14 lets a delegated administrator holding only the admin.users perm
Stored cross-site scripting in Grav CMS before 2.0.15 lets authenticated editors smuggle JavaScript event handlers past
Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in Grav CMS versions prior to 1.7.49.5 allows remote authenticated attackers to make
Grav is a file-based Web platform. Prior to 1.8.0-beta.27, Grav CMS is vulnerable to a Server-Side Template Injection (S
Remote code execution in Grav CMS before 2.0.13 allows authenticated low-privilege users to plant and execute arbitrary
EUVD-2026-42904
GHSA-jxpj-m582-7727
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB