Matrix42 Empirum CVE-2026-57919
HIGHAttack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain low-privileged local session
-
DeliveryPlant malicious shadow.exe in search path
-
ExploitConnect to PBackupVSS named pipe
-
ExecutionSend crafted IPC messages
-
PersistService launches shadow.exe as SYSTEM
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Default permission hardening
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an interactive or local authenticated session on a Windows host where Matrix42 Empirum's Personal Backup component (PBackupVSS.exe) is installed and running - any member of the Authenticated Users group qualifies, because the named pipe \\.\pipe\PBackupVSS is created with a DACL granting GENERIC_READ/GENERIC_WRITE to all authenticated users. The attacker must be able to write a malicious shadow.exe into a working directory that the service's untrusted search path resolves, then send crafted IPC messages over the pipe. Limiting factors: this is local-only (AV:L) - no remote/network exploitation is possible; the attacker needs an existing low-privileged account (PR:L), so it is a post-foothold escalation rather than initial access; and the vulnerable PBackupVSS service must be present and active, so hosts without the Personal Backup feature are not exposed. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.8 (High) with vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - local vector, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact, which is a textbook local-to-SYSTEM escalation profile. The signals are internally consistent: this is genuinely exploitable but requires the attacker to already have a foothold (any authenticated local account), so it is a second-stage/post-compromise primitive rather than a remote entry point. No EPSS score, KEV listing, POC, or SSVC decision data was provided, so there is no evidence of active or automatable exploitation; treat the 7.8 as the dominant signal. Real-world priority is moderate-to-high specifically on hosts where Empirum is deployed and where untrusted users have interactive/local access, but low where only trusted admins log in. Note the limitation: with no EPSS or exploitation-status data, the urgency relative to other patches cannot be ranked from threat-intel signals alone - prioritize based on patch availability and exposure. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has obtained any low-privileged authenticated account on an Empirum-managed Windows host (e.g., a phished standard user or a compromised service account) plants a malicious shadow.exe in a working directory the service will search. They then connect to the \\.\pipe\PBackupVSS named pipe and send crafted IPC messages that cause the SYSTEM-running PBackupVSS.exe to execute that binary, yielding SYSTEM-level code execution. No public exploit code is identified, but the local attack complexity is low and requires no user interaction. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 29, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Matrix42 Empirum (versions before 25.5 and 26.x before 26.2) lets any authenticated low-privileged user gain SYSTEM execution by abusing the PBackupVSS.exe service's named pipe. The pipe \\.\pipe\PBackupVSS is created with an overly permissive DACL granting GENERIC_READ/GENERIC_WRITE to all authenticated users, so an attacker can send crafted IPC messages that drive the SYSTEM-level service into running an attacker-supplied shadow.exe from a controlled working directory. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV, but exploitation is mechanically straightforward once on the host.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to a fixed release: Vendor-released patch is Empirum 25.5 (for the pre-25.5 branch) or 26.2 (for the 26.x branch) or later - install the version matching your deployment branch. Consult the vendor advisory at https://docs.matrix42.com/en_US/1041748_vulnerability-list/cve-2026-57919-privilege-escalation-in-empirum-personal-backup before deploying. Where immediate patching is not possible, reduce exposure by limiting which accounts can log in interactively to systems running the Empirum Personal Backup service, since the attack requires a local authenticated session; on servers or managed endpoints, removing standard-user interactive logon rights largely neutralizes the issue but does not help on shared multi-user hosts. If the Personal Backup feature is not in use, disabling or stopping the PBackupVSS service removes the vulnerable pipe entirely, at the cost of losing shadow-copy backup functionality. Restricting or monitoring access to the \\.\pipe\PBackupVSS named pipe and watching for unexpected shadow.exe spawns from non-standard directories can serve as detective controls, but these do not fully prevent exploitation and patching remains the primary fix.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw lives in the Empirum Personal Backup component (PBackupVSS.exe), a Windows service that interacts with the Volume Shadow Copy Service and runs as SYSTEM. It exposes an inter-process control channel via a Windows named pipe. The root cause is a combination of two weaknesses: an incorrect/over-broad discretionary access control list (DACL) on the pipe object (CWE-732, Incorrect Permission Assignment for a Critical Resource) that exposes a privileged IPC endpoint to the Authenticated Users group, and an uncontrolled/untrusted search path (CWE-426/CWE-427) where the service resolves and launches a helper binary (shadow.exe) from a working directory the attacker can influence. Because the service does not validate the caller's privilege level or use a fully qualified, trusted path for the spawned executable, a normal user can coerce SYSTEM into executing arbitrary code. CWE was reported as N/A in the source feed; the classes above are inferred from the description.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local-only attack needing an existing low-privileged account (AV:L/PR:L), trivially executed with no user interaction (AC:L/UI:N), yielding full SYSTEM compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
DescriptionCVE.org
PBackupVSS.exe in Matrix42 Empirum before 25.5 and 26.x before 26.2 creates a named pipe (\\.\pipe\PBackupVSS) with a DACL that grants GENERIC_READ and GENERIC_WRITE permissions to all authenticated users. A low-privileged local attacker can connect to this pipe and send crafted IPC messages to trigger execution of arbitrary commands with SYSTEM privileges via an untrusted search path. This allows privilege escalation by placing a malicious shadow.exe in a controlled working directory.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB