Skip to main content

GeoVision GV-LPC2011 CVE-2026-57875

| EUVDEUVD-2026-39631 HIGH
NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476)
2026-06-26 GV GHSA-9hv4-r5p9-3gf6
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: GV
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach device HTTP/CGI interface
  2. Delivery
    Craft request omitting required metadata
  3. Exploit
    Send to vulnerable CGI endpoint
  4. Execution
    NULL pointer dereference in parser
  5. Impact
    Process crashes, device offline (DoS)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Null pointer safety, defensive checks
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires only network reachability to the HTTP/CGI management interface of a GeoVision GV-LPC2011 or GV-LPC2211 running firmware V1.12 or earlier - per AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N there is no authentication, user interaction, or special configuration prerequisite beyond the attacker being able to send an HTTP request to the device's web service. The concrete trigger is an HTTP request to an affected CGI component that omits or malforms the required request metadata the parser expects. The primary limiting factor is exposure: the device's web interface must be reachable from the attacker's network position, so units behind segmentation/firewalls or not internet-exposed are not remotely exploitable, and the impact is limited to a crash/denial of service with no data disclosure or code execution.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 7.5) is internally consistent with the description: network-reachable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and an availability-only impact - a clean DoS profile, not code execution despite the HIGH score. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC was provided, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or widespread weaponization; the 7.5 is driven entirely by easy reachability, not by data loss or compromise. Realistic priority is moderate and context-dependent: for an internet-exposed or perimeter-facing LPR deployment a trivially-triggerable remote crash matters, but the impact ceiling is a reboot/outage rather than takeover. EPSS data is missing, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified from the provided input.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can reach the device's HTTP management interface sends a single specially crafted request to one of the vulnerable CGI endpoints with required metadata omitted or malformed, causing the parser to dereference a NULL pointer and crash the process. The targeted GV-LPC unit drops offline (denial of service), interrupting license-plate capture; the attack needs no authentication and no user interaction, and can be repeated to keep the device down. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 1.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 26, 2026

Denial of service in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 license-plate capture devices (firmware V1.12 and earlier) lets a remote, unauthenticated attacker crash the device by sending a single malformed HTTP request to its CGI interface. The flaw is a NULL pointer dereference in HTTP request-parsing logic shared across multiple CGI components, triggered when required request metadata is missing or malformed. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue has no confidentiality or integrity impact - only availability.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data; the only reference is GeoVision's general security advisory page (https://www.geovision.com.tw/cyber_security.php), which should be checked for a firmware build newer than V1.12 and applied once available. As compensating controls until a fixed firmware is confirmed: remove the devices' web/CGI interface from internet exposure and place them on a segmented management VLAN, restricting TCP access to the HTTP(S) management port to a small set of trusted administrative hosts via firewall ACLs (trade-off: legitimate remote management must come through a VPN or jump host). Place a reverse proxy or WAF in front of the CGI interface to enforce well-formed HTTP requests and reject those missing required headers/metadata (trade-off: added latency and maintenance, and it may not block every malformed-request variant). Monitor for unexpected device reboots/crashes as a detection signal, since exploitation manifests as service disruption.

Affected VersionsENISA

GV-LPCLPC2011/2211 1.12

Affected Packages

euvd gv_lpclpc2011_2211 no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected devices are GeoVision GV-LPC (License Plate Capture/Recognition) embedded camera/controller units that expose a web management interface backed by CGI components. CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference) describes the root cause: the CGI HTTP parser reads pointers derived from request metadata (such as headers or content fields) without first validating that those values are present and non-null, then dereferences them. When an attacker omits or corrupts that expected metadata, the process dereferences a NULL pointer and crashes. Because the same defective parsing routine is reused across several CGI endpoints, multiple request paths can reach the bug, increasing the attack surface on the embedded HTTP service.

Know when Gv Lpclpc2011 2211 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (GV) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Remote, no-auth, low-complexity HTTP request triggers a crash (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); impact is availability-only DoS, so C:N/I:N/A:H with unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (GV).

CVSS VectorVendor: GV

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

An unauthenticated NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the HTTP request parsing logic of multiple CGI components in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by improper validation of required HTTP request metadata before it is used by the affected components. A remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted HTTP request, causing the affected process to crash and resulting in a denial of service.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

GeoVision license-plate capture devices (GV-LPC2011/GV-LPC2211, firmware V1.12 and earlier) are vulnerable to remote denial-of-service attacks from unauthenticated attackers that crash the device with a single malformed HTTP request. Organizations operating these devices will lose continuous traffic and parking monitoring capabilities until hardware recovery or remediation. This creates operational risk for any traffic enforcement, parking management, or security surveillance operations dependent on these systems.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) restrict network access to CGI interface via firewall rules or network segmentation, isolating devices from untrusted networks; (2) implement WAF rules to filter malformed HTTP requests; (3) deploy HTTP request rate limiting; (4) monitor network traffic for suspicious HTTP patterns targeting these devices; (5) configure automated alerting on device unavailability to enable rapid incident response.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.3%
Top 34% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche industry-specific license-plate capture hardware, limited deployment footprint
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 1.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A null pointer dereference occurs when a program attempts to access memory through a pointer that has been set to NULL (address 0x0).

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-57878 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 26

Remote code execution in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 license-plate-recognition cameras (firmware V1.12 and earli

CVE-2026-57880 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 26

Unauthenticated remote code execution and denial of service in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 license plate camera

CVE-2026-57879 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 26

Remote code execution and denial of service in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 license-plate-recognition cameras (V1

CVE-2026-57881 CRITICAL
9.8 Jun 26

Remote unauthenticated stack-based buffer overflow in the vlsvr login service of GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 lic

CVE-2026-88278 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Authentication replay in GeoVision GV-LPC2211 license-plate-recognition cameras (firmware V1.13, marketed as GV-LPCLPC20

CVE-2026-88277 HIGH
8.8 Sep 10

Authenticated ONVIF command injection in GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 allows a low-privileged network attacker to execute

CVE-2026-57877 HIGH
8.6 Jun 26

Unauthenticated format string flaw in the vlsvr service of GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 license plate recognition

CVE-2026-57872 HIGH
7.5 Jun 26

Arbitrary file read in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 license plate recognition appliances (firmware V1.12 and earl

CVE-2026-57874 HIGH
7.5 Jun 26

Denial of service in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 license-plate-capture devices (firmware V1.12 and earlier) allo

CVE-2026-57876 HIGH
7.5 Jun 26

Denial of service in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 license plate recognition cameras (firmware V1.12 and earlier)

CVE-2026-57873 HIGH
7.5 Jun 26

Denial of service in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 license plate cameras (firmware V1.12 and earlier) lets remote

CVE-2026-88276 HIGH
7.2 Sep 10

OS command injection in GeoVision GV-LPC2211 firmware V1.13 allows an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary c

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy