Skip to main content

Elastic Defend CVE-2026-56152

| EUVDEUVD-2026-41087 MEDIUM
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863)
2026-07-01 security@elastic.co GHSA-vvj5-p4vc-v5q3
5.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: elastic
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged Elastic credentials
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate to Kibana web interface
  3. Exploit
    Trigger specific undisclosed conditions (AC:H)
  4. Execution
    Query response action data API without proper authorization check
  5. Impact
    Exfiltrate sensitive endpoint response action results

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a low-privileged, authenticated user account within the Elastic deployment (PR:L per CVSS). Additionally, AC:H indicates that 'certain conditions' must be present - the specific configuration, feature state, or deployment mode enabling the bypass is not disclosed in the available data, only referenced as 'under certain conditions' in the description. This means default configurations may not be universally exploitable; the undisclosed prerequisite condition is a meaningful limiting factor. Exploitation is network-reachable (AV:N) through the Elastic/Kibana web interface or API. Limits: an unauthenticated attacker cannot exploit this; the attack complexity is high due to undisclosed conditions; impact is confidentiality-only with no integrity or availability impact; and scope is unchanged, so lateral movement beyond response action data access is not directly enabled by this flaw.

Impact

The provided CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 (Medium) is driven by AV:N (network reachable), PR:L (requires low-privileged account), AC:H (high complexity - 'under certain conditions'), and C:H (full confidentiality breach of response action data). The AC:H metric is the primary score suppressor and is critical for triage: exploitation is not straightforward against default configurations, and specific, as-yet-undisclosed conditions must be met. No EPSS score was provided in the input, and the vulnerability is absent from the CISA KEV catalog, indicating no confirmed active exploitation. No POC is identified. The real-world risk is moderate: a low-privileged user within an Elastic Security deployment could exfiltrate forensic response data (e.g., isolated host details, collected files), which is operationally sensitive and could aid an insider threat or compromised account in understanding the scope of ongoing security investigations. The combination of PR:L and AC:H suggests this is most threatening in environments where untrusted low-privilege users have authenticated Kibana access.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained or created a low-privileged authenticated Kibana account - whether through credential theft, phishing, or a compromised service account - navigates to the Elastic Security response actions interface or queries the relevant API endpoint under the specific undisclosed conditions that bypass authorization checks. The attacker reads response action results intended for higher-privileged security analysts, gaining visibility into which hosts were isolated, what processes were killed, or what forensic files were collected, effectively mapping the scope of an ongoing security investigation.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 01, 2026

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Elastic Defend exposes response action data to low-privileged authenticated users who should not have access to it. The flaw, classified under CAPEC-1, arises because access controls on specific functionality are not properly enforced, allowing a user with minimal privileges to read security response action data belonging to other users or roles. No public exploit code has been identified and the vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog, but the High confidentiality impact (CVSS C:H) means sensitive endpoint response data - such as isolation actions, process kills, or file retrieval outputs - could be disclosed.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to upgrade Elastic Defend to the fixed version(s) identified in Elastic Security Advisory ESA-2026-46, available at https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elastic-defend-8-19-13-9-2-7-9-3-2-security-update-esa-2026-46. Based on the advisory URL slug, fixed releases appear to correspond to versions in the 8.19, 13.9.2, and 7.9.3.2 lines, but exact patch version numbers should be confirmed directly from the advisory page. As a compensating control prior to patching, administrators should audit role-based access control (RBAC) assignments in Kibana and restrict response action visibility to only those users and roles that operationally require it, using Elastic's built-in privilege model. Reducing the number of low-privileged accounts with authenticated Kibana access limits exposure. No patch version was independently confirmed from the provided input data - consult the vendor advisory directly for authoritative version guidance.

Affected VersionsENISA

Elastic Defend 9.0.0 ≤9.2.6
Elastic Defend 9.3.0 ≤9.3.1
Elastic Defend 8.6.0 ≤8.19.12

Affected Packages

euvd elastic_defend no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Elastic Defend is Elastic's endpoint detection and response (EDR) agent, part of the Elastic Security platform. It integrates with Elasticsearch and Kibana to collect telemetry, enforce security policies, and execute response actions such as host isolation, process termination, and file retrieval. CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization) indicates the application performs authentication but fails to correctly verify whether the authenticated user has the right authorization for the specific resource or action being accessed - in this case, response action result data. This maps to CAPEC-1, where access controls on a feature or data set are insufficiently constrained, allowing access via a path that bypasses the intended ACL model. The vulnerability is reachable over the network, consistent with Kibana's web-based API surface through which response action data is exposed.

Know when Endpoint Security gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (elastic) PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.3 MEDIUM

Network-reachable via Kibana API, but AC:H reflects undisclosed prerequisite conditions; PR:L confirmed by description; confidentiality-only impact with no integrity or availability effect.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (elastic).

CVSS VectorVendor: elastic

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Elastic Defend can lead to unauthorized information disclosure via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Under certain conditions, a low-privileged authenticated user can access response action data that they are not authorized to view.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise EDR platform, deployed in security-conscious organizations
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2024-0353 HIGH POC
7.8 Feb 15

Local privilege escalation vulnerability potentially allowed an attacker to misuse ESET’s file operations to delete file

CVE-2019-8461 HIGH POC
7.8 Aug 29

Check Point Endpoint Security Initial Client for Windows before version E81.30 tries to load a DLL placed in any PATH lo

CVE-2019-8452 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 22

A hard-link created from log file archive of Check Point ZoneAlarm up to 15.4.062 or Check Point Endpoint Security clien

CVE-2014-4973 MEDIUM POC
6.9 Sep 23

The ESET Personal Firewall NDIS filter (EpFwNdis.sys) driver in the Firewall Module Build 1183 (20140214) and earlier in

CVE-2016-9892 MEDIUM POC
5.9 Mar 02

The esets_daemon service in ESET Endpoint Antivirus for macOS before 6.4.168.0 and Endpoint Security for macOS before 6.

CVE-2024-2224 CRITICAL
9.8 Apr 09

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (‘Path Traversal’) vulnerability in the UpdateServer compone

CVE-2024-2223 CRITICAL
9.8 Apr 09

An Incorrect Regular Expression vulnerability in Bitdefender GravityZone Update Server allows an attacker to cause a Ser

CVE-2022-27534 CRITICAL
9.8 Apr 01

Kaspersky Anti-Virus products for home and Kaspersky Endpoint Security with antivirus databases released before 12 March

CVE-2021-45090 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 21

Stormshield Endpoint Security before 2.1.2 allows remote code execution. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulner

CVE-2026-75120 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 13

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass the security controls that are supposed to be enforced during session establ

CVE-2026-13043 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 01

The Kernel Memory Access Driver (PSKMAD) shipped with WatchGuard endpoint security products fails to enforce its access-

CVE-2016-3984 MEDIUM POC
5.1 Apr 08

The McAfee VirusScan Console (mcconsol.exe) in McAfee Active Response (MAR) before 1.1.0.161, Agent (MA) 5.x before 5.0.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy